Efficacy of adjunctive theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation in acute mania: A randomized and placebo-controlled study

Aditi Bhatia, Shobit Garg, Priya Tyagi, Eshani Pandey
{"title":"Efficacy of adjunctive theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation in acute mania: A randomized and placebo-controlled study","authors":"Aditi Bhatia, Shobit Garg, Priya Tyagi, Eshani Pandey","doi":"10.25259/abp_3_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been suggested as a non-invasive stimulation treatment modality in bipolar disorder. However, the efficacy of repetitiver TMS in acute phase mania is unclear. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of theta burst stimulation (TBS) as an add-on therapy in the treatment of acute phase mania stimulation both right and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in a randomized and sham-controlled design.\n\n\n\nForty right-handed patients between 18 and 59 years were randomly allocated to active and sham groups. Then, intermittent TBS (right DLPFC) and cTBS (left DLPFC) sessions (half an hour apart) were delivered in two sessions per day for 5 days in a week. Youngs Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and Clinical global impression-Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) were assessed at baseline and at 7th and 21st days.\n\n\n\nOur study fails to show a significant effect on of active stimulation in comparison to sham over psychopathology YMRS (F = 0.300; P ≤ 0.612), CGIBP-S (F = 0.432; P = 0.562), CGIBP-P (F = 0.202; P = 0.701), and CGIBP-W (F = 200; P = 0.705) in intention to treat protocol across 21 days. Minimal side effects were reported and none of the patients discontinued TBS citing side effects.\n\n\n\nWe conclude that it is safe and well tolerated yet has inconclusive short-term therapeutic benefits. Trials using better localization technique with large sample, longer duration, and better dosing protocols are needed.\n","PeriodicalId":361830,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Biological Psychiatry","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/abp_3_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been suggested as a non-invasive stimulation treatment modality in bipolar disorder. However, the efficacy of repetitiver TMS in acute phase mania is unclear. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of theta burst stimulation (TBS) as an add-on therapy in the treatment of acute phase mania stimulation both right and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in a randomized and sham-controlled design. Forty right-handed patients between 18 and 59 years were randomly allocated to active and sham groups. Then, intermittent TBS (right DLPFC) and cTBS (left DLPFC) sessions (half an hour apart) were delivered in two sessions per day for 5 days in a week. Youngs Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and Clinical global impression-Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) were assessed at baseline and at 7th and 21st days. Our study fails to show a significant effect on of active stimulation in comparison to sham over psychopathology YMRS (F = 0.300; P ≤ 0.612), CGIBP-S (F = 0.432; P = 0.562), CGIBP-P (F = 0.202; P = 0.701), and CGIBP-W (F = 200; P = 0.705) in intention to treat protocol across 21 days. Minimal side effects were reported and none of the patients discontinued TBS citing side effects. We conclude that it is safe and well tolerated yet has inconclusive short-term therapeutic benefits. Trials using better localization technique with large sample, longer duration, and better dosing protocols are needed.
辅助脉冲经颅磁刺激治疗急性躁狂症的疗效:一项随机和安慰剂对照研究
经颅磁刺激(TMS)已被认为是双相情感障碍的一种非侵入性刺激治疗方式。然而,重复经颅磁刺激对急性期躁狂症的疗效尚不清楚。本研究的目的是在随机和假对照设计中评估θ波爆发刺激(TBS)作为治疗急性期躁狂刺激右、左背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)的附加疗法的疗效。40名18至59岁的右撇子患者被随机分为活跃组和假手术组。然后,进行间歇性TBS(右侧DLPFC)和cTBS(左侧DLPFC)(间隔半小时),每天两次,一周5天。分别在基线、第7天和第21天对杨氏躁狂评定量表(YMRS)和临床总体印象-双相情感障碍(CGI-BP)进行评估。我们的研究没有显示积极刺激对心理病理YMRS的显著影响(F = 0.300;P≤0.612),cgip - s (f = 0.432;P = 0.562), cgip -P (f = 0.202;P = 0.701), CGIBP-W (F = 200;P = 0.705)在21天内的意向治疗方案。据报道,副作用最小,没有患者因副作用而停止使用TBS。我们的结论是,它是安全的,耐受性良好,但短期治疗效果尚不确定。需要使用更好的定位技术、更大的样本、更长的持续时间和更好的给药方案进行试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信