Corns of feet: Can homoeopathy be a better alternative? A narrative review

Pooja Gautam, Meetu Goel, A. Sahoo, Papri Debbarma
{"title":"Corns of feet: Can homoeopathy be a better alternative? A narrative review","authors":"Pooja Gautam, Meetu Goel, A. Sahoo, Papri Debbarma","doi":"10.25259/jish_50_2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hyperkeratotic lesions of the foot (including corns and calluses) have been reported to affect 30-65% of people aged 65 or older. Modern medicine has no options other than surgical removal, which is invasive and painful and causes scarring and destruction of the surrounding normal tissue. Surgical removal also poses a high risk of recurrence.\n\n\nThis article is an attempt to find a better and more gentle alternative for the treatment of corns and throw light on the scope of homoeopathy in this condition, as homoeopathy is known to have fewer side effects.\n\n\n\nExisting homoeopathic literature and published research studies on the subject were reviewed. The conventional treatment protocol was also reviewed to assess its efficacy and shortcomings, as was the scope of homoeopathic treatment in foot corns.\n\n\n\nDespite foot corn being a fairly common condition, very few options allow long-term resolution. While homoeopathic literature has numerous medicines for this condition, minimal documentation exists of successfully treated cases.\n\n\n\nHomoeopathy is a viable and effective option for gently treating corn using individualised medicines. Conducting clinical studies with larger sample sizes and well-drafted protocols are necessary to provide evidence supporting the efficacy of homoeopathy.\n","PeriodicalId":151763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrated Standardized Homoeopathy","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrated Standardized Homoeopathy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/jish_50_2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Hyperkeratotic lesions of the foot (including corns and calluses) have been reported to affect 30-65% of people aged 65 or older. Modern medicine has no options other than surgical removal, which is invasive and painful and causes scarring and destruction of the surrounding normal tissue. Surgical removal also poses a high risk of recurrence. This article is an attempt to find a better and more gentle alternative for the treatment of corns and throw light on the scope of homoeopathy in this condition, as homoeopathy is known to have fewer side effects. Existing homoeopathic literature and published research studies on the subject were reviewed. The conventional treatment protocol was also reviewed to assess its efficacy and shortcomings, as was the scope of homoeopathic treatment in foot corns. Despite foot corn being a fairly common condition, very few options allow long-term resolution. While homoeopathic literature has numerous medicines for this condition, minimal documentation exists of successfully treated cases. Homoeopathy is a viable and effective option for gently treating corn using individualised medicines. Conducting clinical studies with larger sample sizes and well-drafted protocols are necessary to provide evidence supporting the efficacy of homoeopathy.
鸡眼:顺势疗法是更好的选择吗?叙述性回顾
据报道,30-65%的65岁或以上的人患有足部角化过度病变(包括鸡眼和老茧)。现代医学除了手术切除之外没有其他选择,手术是侵入性的,痛苦的,会造成疤痕和周围正常组织的破坏。手术切除也有很高的复发风险。本文试图找到一种更好、更温和的治疗玉米的方法,并在这种情况下阐明顺势疗法的范围,因为顺势疗法已知副作用更少。对现有的顺势疗法文献和已发表的相关研究进行了综述。对传统治疗方案也进行了回顾,以评估其疗效和缺点,以及顺势疗法治疗足部鸡眼的范围。尽管脚玉米是相当常见的情况,很少有选择允许长期解决。虽然顺势疗法文献中有许多针对这种情况的药物,但成功治疗病例的文献很少。顺势疗法是使用个体化药物温和治疗玉米的一种可行和有效的选择。开展更大样本量的临床研究和精心起草的方案是必要的,以提供支持顺势疗法疗效的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信