{"title":"Determinants of External-Debt Crises. A Probit Model","authors":"M. Magomedova","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3042887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issue of EDC became increasingly important in the field of development economics primarily because EDC has been occurring more frequent after the deregulation of global financial flows in the 1970s (Tiruneh 2004, Jones 2015) hitting mostly MICs and LICs. Assessing the probability of an EDC to occur is especially important since recovery from an EDC imposes additional costs on the affected economies in tangible and non tangible terms. The main findings of my research boil up to the following conclusions. First, an increase in the level of inflation, share of short term debt in ED, net barter TOT, total debt service to GNI ratio, and share of income held by the richest 10% and share of agriculture in GDP leads to an increase in the probability of an EDC to occur. Second, an increase of are total reserves to ED ratio and the total debt service to GNI ratio leads to a decrease of the probability of an EDC to occur. Therefore, holding FX reserves is a strong protective measure from an EDC. Third, the share of income held by the richest 10% of the population is an especially strong determinant of EDC for the LMICs; while in the LICs the effect of this factor is opposite, meaning that LICs with low level of income inequality have higher risk of a debt distress. The probit model helps to predict the probability of the EDC to occur in any given country using the values of the determinants. (The abbreviations are clarified in the text.)","PeriodicalId":360770,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Debt; Debt Management (Topic)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Debt; Debt Management (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3042887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The issue of EDC became increasingly important in the field of development economics primarily because EDC has been occurring more frequent after the deregulation of global financial flows in the 1970s (Tiruneh 2004, Jones 2015) hitting mostly MICs and LICs. Assessing the probability of an EDC to occur is especially important since recovery from an EDC imposes additional costs on the affected economies in tangible and non tangible terms. The main findings of my research boil up to the following conclusions. First, an increase in the level of inflation, share of short term debt in ED, net barter TOT, total debt service to GNI ratio, and share of income held by the richest 10% and share of agriculture in GDP leads to an increase in the probability of an EDC to occur. Second, an increase of are total reserves to ED ratio and the total debt service to GNI ratio leads to a decrease of the probability of an EDC to occur. Therefore, holding FX reserves is a strong protective measure from an EDC. Third, the share of income held by the richest 10% of the population is an especially strong determinant of EDC for the LMICs; while in the LICs the effect of this factor is opposite, meaning that LICs with low level of income inequality have higher risk of a debt distress. The probit model helps to predict the probability of the EDC to occur in any given country using the values of the determinants. (The abbreviations are clarified in the text.)
EDC问题在发展经济学领域变得越来越重要,主要是因为在20世纪70年代全球金融流动放松管制(Tiruneh 2004, Jones 2015)主要影响中等收入国家和低收入国家之后,EDC发生得更加频繁。评估经济灾害发生的可能性尤为重要,因为从经济灾害中恢复会给受影响的经济体带来有形和无形的额外成本。我研究的主要发现可以归结为以下结论。首先,通货膨胀水平、短期债务占GDP的比例、净易货运输成本、总偿债额占GNI的比例、最富有的10%的收入份额和农业占GDP的比例的增加,导致经济发展变化发生的可能性增加。第二,总储备与gdp之比和偿债总额与国民总收入之比的增加,导致发生EDC的可能性降低。因此,持有外汇储备是抵御EDC的有力保护措施。第三,最富有的10%人口所持有的收入份额是中低收入国家经济发展的一个特别重要的决定因素;而在低收入国家,这一因素的影响是相反的,这意味着收入不平等程度低的低收入国家面临债务困境的风险更高。probit模型利用决定因素的值帮助预测EDC在任何给定国家发生的概率。(文中对缩略语作了说明。)