Comparison of Illumigene, Verigene, and Amplivue for Rapid Molecular Detection of Clostridium difficile in Pediatric Stool Specimens

Charles Sailey, J. Neary, Angie Rounsavall, G. Woods
{"title":"Comparison of Illumigene, Verigene, and Amplivue for Rapid Molecular Detection of Clostridium difficile in Pediatric Stool Specimens","authors":"Charles Sailey, J. Neary, Angie Rounsavall, G. Woods","doi":"10.4172/2161-0703.1000201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pediatric Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been steadily rising over the past decade and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Rapid and accurate diagnostic testing is important in medical management. Due to the low sensitivity of enzyme immunoassays, and the complexity of culture based methods, many labs are utilizing newer molecular techniques for direct detection of nucleic acid in stool. Methods: 59 prospective stool specimens from 57 pediatric patients (aged 4 months to 19 years) with suspected CDI were tested over a 4 month period. Three FDA-cleared molecular platforms, Meridian Illumigene, Nanosphere Verigene, and Quidel AmpliVue, were compared. All samples had a consistency rating (CR) from 1 - 5 (watery - solid) assigned and were refrigerated prior to testing. Those with a CR=5 were excluded. Six positive specimens were frozen for 3 months then retested, and two of those were serially frozen, thawed, and retested 5 more times over 5 months. Results: All 3 platforms agreed for 55 (93%) specimens. There were 17 positive and 38 negative results. Five positive specimens were called BI/NAP1/027 by Verigene. Of the 4 discrepant results, 3 (2 CR=3, 1 CR=2) were invalid by Illumigene and negative by the other platforms. One sample (CR=4) was Verigene indeterminate, Illumigene positive, and AmpliVue negative. All frozen specimens gave correct results on all platforms. Conclusions: These data suggest that each platform offers a viable solution for rapid diagnosis of CDI in children. Additionally, long term frozen samples can be tested reliably.","PeriodicalId":269971,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Microbiology and Diagnosis","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Microbiology and Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0703.1000201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Pediatric Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been steadily rising over the past decade and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Rapid and accurate diagnostic testing is important in medical management. Due to the low sensitivity of enzyme immunoassays, and the complexity of culture based methods, many labs are utilizing newer molecular techniques for direct detection of nucleic acid in stool. Methods: 59 prospective stool specimens from 57 pediatric patients (aged 4 months to 19 years) with suspected CDI were tested over a 4 month period. Three FDA-cleared molecular platforms, Meridian Illumigene, Nanosphere Verigene, and Quidel AmpliVue, were compared. All samples had a consistency rating (CR) from 1 - 5 (watery - solid) assigned and were refrigerated prior to testing. Those with a CR=5 were excluded. Six positive specimens were frozen for 3 months then retested, and two of those were serially frozen, thawed, and retested 5 more times over 5 months. Results: All 3 platforms agreed for 55 (93%) specimens. There were 17 positive and 38 negative results. Five positive specimens were called BI/NAP1/027 by Verigene. Of the 4 discrepant results, 3 (2 CR=3, 1 CR=2) were invalid by Illumigene and negative by the other platforms. One sample (CR=4) was Verigene indeterminate, Illumigene positive, and AmpliVue negative. All frozen specimens gave correct results on all platforms. Conclusions: These data suggest that each platform offers a viable solution for rapid diagnosis of CDI in children. Additionally, long term frozen samples can be tested reliably.
儿童粪便标本中艰难梭菌快速分子检测的Illumigene、Verigene和amplue比较
背景:儿童艰难梭菌感染(CDI)在过去十年中稳步上升,并与发病率和死亡率增加有关。快速、准确的诊断检测在医疗管理中具有重要意义。由于酶免疫测定的低灵敏度和基于培养方法的复杂性,许多实验室正在利用较新的分子技术直接检测粪便中的核酸。方法:对57例疑似CDI患儿(年龄4个月至19岁)的59份粪便标本进行为期4个月的检测。比较了三种fda批准的分子平台,Meridian Illumigene, Nanosphere Verigene和Quidel AmpliVue。所有样品的一致性评级(CR)从1 - 5(水-固体)分配,并在测试前冷藏。CR=5者排除。6例阳性标本冷冻3个月后复验,其中2例在5个月内连续冷冻、解冻、复验5次。结果:3个平台对55例(93%)标本一致。阳性17例,阴性38例。5例阳性标本被Verigene命名为BI/NAP1/027。4例差异结果中,3例(2 CR=3, 1 CR=2) Illumigene无效,其他平台阴性。一个样本(CR=4) Verigene不确定,Illumigene阳性,ampliue阴性。所有冷冻标本在所有平台上均给出了正确的结果。结论:这些数据表明,每个平台都为儿童CDI的快速诊断提供了可行的解决方案。此外,长期冷冻的样品可以可靠地进行测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信