Unified Approach to Assess Engineering Performance of Fill Improved by Shallow to Deep Compaction Based Techniques Using Relative Density

A. Alaaeldin, E. Spyropoulos, A. Orabi
{"title":"Unified Approach to Assess Engineering Performance of Fill Improved by Shallow to Deep Compaction Based Techniques Using Relative Density","authors":"A. Alaaeldin, E. Spyropoulos, A. Orabi","doi":"10.4236/ojce.2020.103020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The setting of pre assessment criteria for soil compaction is hardly \ndetermined, especially, in case of undecided structure locations. Different \ndesign guidelines recommend achieving a specific value of relative density for \nthe compaction of fill placement works. Alternatives were discussed through the \nliterature to predict the value of relative density based on soil field tests (e.g. \ncone and standard penetration tests). This paper presents the weakness of using \nthe Over Consolidation Ratio (OCR) as guidance to assess the value of cone tip \nresistance using the soil relative density. The variation of OCR (from 1 to 10) \nhas a significant effect on the qc value up to 110% when compared to the normally consolidated state. Then \nnormally consolidated state can logically cover the compaction process with \nvariation of 20%, 33%, and 4% for relative density values 85%, 70%, and 60%, \nrespectively. A unified approach is recommended to predict the compaction qc-performance line using \nnormally consolidated condition and sand relative density.","PeriodicalId":302856,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2020.103020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The setting of pre assessment criteria for soil compaction is hardly determined, especially, in case of undecided structure locations. Different design guidelines recommend achieving a specific value of relative density for the compaction of fill placement works. Alternatives were discussed through the literature to predict the value of relative density based on soil field tests (e.g. cone and standard penetration tests). This paper presents the weakness of using the Over Consolidation Ratio (OCR) as guidance to assess the value of cone tip resistance using the soil relative density. The variation of OCR (from 1 to 10) has a significant effect on the qc value up to 110% when compared to the normally consolidated state. Then normally consolidated state can logically cover the compaction process with variation of 20%, 33%, and 4% for relative density values 85%, 70%, and 60%, respectively. A unified approach is recommended to predict the compaction qc-performance line using normally consolidated condition and sand relative density.
基于相对密度的浅至深压实技术改进填料工程性能统一评价方法
土压实预评价标准的设置很难确定,特别是在结构位置未确定的情况下。不同的设计指引建议在填土工程压实时达到特定的相对密度值。通过文献讨论了基于土壤现场试验(如锥贯试验和标准贯入试验)预测相对密度值的替代方法。本文指出了用超固结比(OCR)作为指导,用土壤相对密度来评价锥尖阻力值的不足。与正常固结状态相比,OCR的变化(从1到10)对qc值的影响最大可达110%。通常固结状态在逻辑上可以覆盖压实过程,相对密度值分别为85%、70%和60%,变化幅度分别为20%、33%和4%。提出了用正常固结状态和砂体相对密度预测压实qc-性能线的统一方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信