On the Margins

Francesca Trivellato
{"title":"On the Margins","authors":"Francesca Trivellato","doi":"10.1353/cap.2021.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IT IS A LONGSTANDING TROPE that observing from the margins affords moral and intellectual clarity. In academia, marginality comes in diff er­ ent forms and can mean diff er ent things. It can be the result of historical shifts in the status of diff er ent disciplines ( today the humanities vis­ à­ vis the domains of science, technology, engineering, and mathe matics), of certain topics or methods within a field or a discipline, or of a set of institutions or nations within academic hierarchies that have been established by long­ lasting traditions or recent rankings. Marginality can also refer to the lower standing accorded to groups facing historical and structural discrimination, notably gen­ der, ethnic, and racial minorities. Of course, these multiple ways of not being fully validated by academic establishments vary across time and from place to place, and in some cases can take highly local and even subjective conno­ tations. Some patterns are nonethless vis i ble, including the tendency of most disciplines to consolidate their bound aries even as they attempt to broaden their scope and membership. The practice of historical writing in the past half­ century has been trans­ formed by a number of diverse and influential scholars, ranging from Natalie Zemon Davis to James C. Scott and from Eric Wolf to Joan W. Scott, to name only a few, who, each from diff er ent standpoints, have brought subjects and approaches that were previously absent from the canon into the mainstream. In the pro cess, they have also given us new paradigms with which to think about culture, power, and economic change.1 More recently, in one of the books of the twenty­ first century most read by historians and social scientists, Kenneth Pomeranz placed eighteenth­ century England and the Yangzi Delta region in a reciprocal comparison and thus challenged the notions of “cen­ ter” and “periphery” as they had been crystallized by Immanuel Wallerstein’s world­ system analysis.2 Some intellectual historians, for their part, have inter preted the margins literally and focused on the margins of the page: by giving equal weight to the authorial text and the copious annotations left by readers in between and around printed and manuscript lines, they have","PeriodicalId":243846,"journal":{"name":"Capitalism: A Journal of History and Economics","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Capitalism: A Journal of History and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cap.2021.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

IT IS A LONGSTANDING TROPE that observing from the margins affords moral and intellectual clarity. In academia, marginality comes in diff er­ ent forms and can mean diff er ent things. It can be the result of historical shifts in the status of diff er ent disciplines ( today the humanities vis­ à­ vis the domains of science, technology, engineering, and mathe matics), of certain topics or methods within a field or a discipline, or of a set of institutions or nations within academic hierarchies that have been established by long­ lasting traditions or recent rankings. Marginality can also refer to the lower standing accorded to groups facing historical and structural discrimination, notably gen­ der, ethnic, and racial minorities. Of course, these multiple ways of not being fully validated by academic establishments vary across time and from place to place, and in some cases can take highly local and even subjective conno­ tations. Some patterns are nonethless vis i ble, including the tendency of most disciplines to consolidate their bound aries even as they attempt to broaden their scope and membership. The practice of historical writing in the past half­ century has been trans­ formed by a number of diverse and influential scholars, ranging from Natalie Zemon Davis to James C. Scott and from Eric Wolf to Joan W. Scott, to name only a few, who, each from diff er ent standpoints, have brought subjects and approaches that were previously absent from the canon into the mainstream. In the pro cess, they have also given us new paradigms with which to think about culture, power, and economic change.1 More recently, in one of the books of the twenty­ first century most read by historians and social scientists, Kenneth Pomeranz placed eighteenth­ century England and the Yangzi Delta region in a reciprocal comparison and thus challenged the notions of “cen­ ter” and “periphery” as they had been crystallized by Immanuel Wallerstein’s world­ system analysis.2 Some intellectual historians, for their part, have inter preted the margins literally and focused on the margins of the page: by giving equal weight to the authorial text and the copious annotations left by readers in between and around printed and manuscript lines, they have
在边缘
这是一个长期存在的比喻,从边缘观察可以提供道德和智力上的清晰度。在学术界,边缘性以不同的形式出现,可能意味着不同的东西。它可以是不同学科(今天的人文学科相对于科学、技术、工程和数学领域)地位的历史变化的结果,也可以是一个领域或学科中的某些主题或方法的结果,也可以是一组机构或国家的学术等级制度的结果,这些等级制度是由长期的传统或最近的排名建立起来的。边缘化也可以指面临历史和结构性歧视的群体,特别是性别、民族和少数民族,所享有的较低地位。当然,这些不被学术机构完全认可的多种方式因时间和地点而异,在某些情况下,可能需要高度地方性甚至主观的对话。尽管如此,有些模式仍然是可见的,包括大多数学科在试图扩大其范围和成员时巩固其界限的趋势。在过去的半个世纪里,历史写作的实践已经被许多不同的和有影响力的学者所改变,从娜塔莉·泽蒙·戴维斯到詹姆斯·c·斯科特,从埃里克·沃尔夫到琼·w·斯科特,仅举几例,他们每个人都从不同的立场出发,把以前从经典中缺失的主题和方法带入主流。在这个过程中,它们也为我们提供了思考文化、权力和经济变革的新范式最近,在一本21世纪历史学家和社会科学家阅读最多的书中,肯尼斯·彭慕兰将18世纪的英格兰和长江三角洲地区进行了相互比较,从而挑战了伊曼纽尔·沃勒斯坦(Immanuel Wallerstein)的世界体系分析所明确的“中心”和“边缘”概念对一些有思想的历史学家来说,他们从字面上解释了页边空白处,并把注意力集中在书页的空白处:他们把作者的文字和读者在印刷行和手稿行之间和周围留下的大量注释同等重视
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信