Entrepreneurial Tricks and Ethics Surveyed in Different Countries

Miroslav Pivoda, F. Hoy, Kiril Todorov, V. Vojtko
{"title":"Entrepreneurial Tricks and Ethics Surveyed in Different Countries","authors":"Miroslav Pivoda, F. Hoy, Kiril Todorov, V. Vojtko","doi":"10.4018/jeei.2011070105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To resolve entry and growth problems, entrepreneurs use creative solutions or tricks, which some may find to be ethically questionable. Generating mistrust is a negative consequence when engaging in entrepreneurial tricks. In spite of that, 66% of entrepreneurs (out of 201 respondents) and 76% of business students (out of 213) consider using some tricks as absolutely necessary if an entrepreneur wants to succeed in his or her domestic business environment. Surprisingly optimistic, 52% of entrepreneurs and 57% of students believe that business ethics can be improved substantially by teaching business ethics to entrepreneurs. And of course, there are different levels of ethics standards or custom practices in different countries emerging from our survey in five countries and a few responses from 21 other countries. The authors also discuss the possible future for business tricks, and if there might be any benefits of them. techniques (tricks) to overcome this such as: “Optical enlargement of a business”, “Fictitious location of a company” or “Spying on competitors”. Tricks represent effective tools for starting entrepreneurs, namely in a very rigid environment. Tricks are used not only by starting entrepreneurs; see for example the article by Stalks (2006) about curveball strategies in business. However, these techniques are forms of deception, and may be ethically questionable. To understand how different groups in different DOI: 10.4018/jeei.2011070105 International Journal of E-Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 2(3), 46-63, July-September 2011 47 Copyright © 2011, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited. countries ethically perceive the same tricks, we initiated an empirical study. Scholarly studies in business and economics literature addressing ethical issues have tended to focus on large, complex organizations. Illegal and corrupt practices attract national and international media attention. Books and articles regularly appear that expose unethical practices and advise executives on the consequences of actions and on how to infuse ethical values into corporations (c.f. Bakan, 2005; Ferrell, Fraedrich, & Ferrell, 2010; Schumpeter, 2010). Economic, environmental and social crises are often purported to have been caused by unethical behavior on the part of leaders of large corporations. Most students who acquire knowledge as a result of scholarly research will eventually be involved with or affected by new and small businesses, however. Thus, more attention needs to be given to the actions taken by entrepreneurs as they attempt to initiate and grow their ventures. A few efforts have been made to examine the ethical practices and dilemmas of new and small businesses. Harrison (2005) observed that entrepreneurship has become a public policy issue in many countries that are seeking to improve their economies by encouraging business ownership. Moves toward reduction or elimination of regulations in order to spur venture formation can prove dangerous, however. Not all means of creating wealth are good for society. Harrison cites drug trafficking as an example. He also pointed out that ethical values vary by country, and that even within a particular culture, “entrepreneurs tend to be unconventional thinkers“ (p. 124). By breaking away from social norms, their ethical behavior may be different than conventional managers. This notion of entrepreneurs varying both internationally and from others within their own country was also articulated by Obrecht (2004) (see also Bucar, Glas, & Hisrich, 2003; Teal & Carroll, 1999). He suggested that such variance does not prevent the consideration of ethical conduct and even the development of ethical standards. Specifically, he argued that the ethical part of entrepreneurial behavior influences the building and maintenance of trust in relationships, subsequently reflected in a variety of networks: cooperative, institutional, personal and transactions. Olbrecht’s model builds on some of the classics of the literature, including Donaldson (1968) and Kirzner (1973). The word ‘integrity’ is gaining greater usage in the prescriptions for entrepreneurs to be successful in building their relationships and growing their ventures. Acknowledging multiple explanations for unethical behavior, Kuratko and Hornsby (2009) urge entrepreneurs to prepare and adhere to ethical codes of conduct. Drawing from Keyes, Stirling, and Nielsen (2007), they contend that both businesses and consumers prefer to engage in commerce with companies that have cultures of integrity. They propose a three-phased approach to embedding such a culture: 1) educating employees; 2) specifying rewards of ethical behavior and consequences of unethical behavior; and 3) providing coaching and intensive feedback. Early investigators of ethics in entrepreneurship concentrated on attitudes of small business owners (Brown & King, 1982; Hornsby, Kuratko, Naffziger, LaFollette, & Hodgetts, 1994; Longenecker, McKinney, & Moore, 1989; Serwinek, 1992; Smith & Oakley, 1994). More recently, researchers have examined ethical variations among groups (e.g., gender, organizational size, functional activity, etc.), indicating a recognition that there is no universal perspective of ethics (Marta, Singhapakdi, & Kraft, 2008; Morris, Schindehutte, Walton, & Allen, 2002; Neubaum, Mitchell, & Schminke, 2004; Schminke, 2001). Some studies specifically examine instances in which legal boundaries have been crossed (Tonoyan, Strohmeyer, Habib, & Perlitz, 2010), the current investigation has chosen examples that are not illegal, but may be perceived as unethical in some contexts. What preceded our current research? There was a preliminary study (based on 30 respondents only) which was presented in 2007. Then in 2008 we presented a survey based on 16 more pages are available in the full version of this document, which may be purchased using the \"Add to Cart\" button on the product's webpage: www.igi-global.com/article/entrepreneurial-tricks-ethicssurveyed-different/58356?camid=4v1 This title is available in InfoSci-Journals, InfoSci-Journal Disciplines Business, Administration, and Management. Recommend this product to your librarian: www.igi-global.com/e-resources/libraryrecommendation/?id=2","PeriodicalId":102199,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. E Entrepreneurship Innov.","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. E Entrepreneurship Innov.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/jeei.2011070105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

To resolve entry and growth problems, entrepreneurs use creative solutions or tricks, which some may find to be ethically questionable. Generating mistrust is a negative consequence when engaging in entrepreneurial tricks. In spite of that, 66% of entrepreneurs (out of 201 respondents) and 76% of business students (out of 213) consider using some tricks as absolutely necessary if an entrepreneur wants to succeed in his or her domestic business environment. Surprisingly optimistic, 52% of entrepreneurs and 57% of students believe that business ethics can be improved substantially by teaching business ethics to entrepreneurs. And of course, there are different levels of ethics standards or custom practices in different countries emerging from our survey in five countries and a few responses from 21 other countries. The authors also discuss the possible future for business tricks, and if there might be any benefits of them. techniques (tricks) to overcome this such as: “Optical enlargement of a business”, “Fictitious location of a company” or “Spying on competitors”. Tricks represent effective tools for starting entrepreneurs, namely in a very rigid environment. Tricks are used not only by starting entrepreneurs; see for example the article by Stalks (2006) about curveball strategies in business. However, these techniques are forms of deception, and may be ethically questionable. To understand how different groups in different DOI: 10.4018/jeei.2011070105 International Journal of E-Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 2(3), 46-63, July-September 2011 47 Copyright © 2011, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited. countries ethically perceive the same tricks, we initiated an empirical study. Scholarly studies in business and economics literature addressing ethical issues have tended to focus on large, complex organizations. Illegal and corrupt practices attract national and international media attention. Books and articles regularly appear that expose unethical practices and advise executives on the consequences of actions and on how to infuse ethical values into corporations (c.f. Bakan, 2005; Ferrell, Fraedrich, & Ferrell, 2010; Schumpeter, 2010). Economic, environmental and social crises are often purported to have been caused by unethical behavior on the part of leaders of large corporations. Most students who acquire knowledge as a result of scholarly research will eventually be involved with or affected by new and small businesses, however. Thus, more attention needs to be given to the actions taken by entrepreneurs as they attempt to initiate and grow their ventures. A few efforts have been made to examine the ethical practices and dilemmas of new and small businesses. Harrison (2005) observed that entrepreneurship has become a public policy issue in many countries that are seeking to improve their economies by encouraging business ownership. Moves toward reduction or elimination of regulations in order to spur venture formation can prove dangerous, however. Not all means of creating wealth are good for society. Harrison cites drug trafficking as an example. He also pointed out that ethical values vary by country, and that even within a particular culture, “entrepreneurs tend to be unconventional thinkers“ (p. 124). By breaking away from social norms, their ethical behavior may be different than conventional managers. This notion of entrepreneurs varying both internationally and from others within their own country was also articulated by Obrecht (2004) (see also Bucar, Glas, & Hisrich, 2003; Teal & Carroll, 1999). He suggested that such variance does not prevent the consideration of ethical conduct and even the development of ethical standards. Specifically, he argued that the ethical part of entrepreneurial behavior influences the building and maintenance of trust in relationships, subsequently reflected in a variety of networks: cooperative, institutional, personal and transactions. Olbrecht’s model builds on some of the classics of the literature, including Donaldson (1968) and Kirzner (1973). The word ‘integrity’ is gaining greater usage in the prescriptions for entrepreneurs to be successful in building their relationships and growing their ventures. Acknowledging multiple explanations for unethical behavior, Kuratko and Hornsby (2009) urge entrepreneurs to prepare and adhere to ethical codes of conduct. Drawing from Keyes, Stirling, and Nielsen (2007), they contend that both businesses and consumers prefer to engage in commerce with companies that have cultures of integrity. They propose a three-phased approach to embedding such a culture: 1) educating employees; 2) specifying rewards of ethical behavior and consequences of unethical behavior; and 3) providing coaching and intensive feedback. Early investigators of ethics in entrepreneurship concentrated on attitudes of small business owners (Brown & King, 1982; Hornsby, Kuratko, Naffziger, LaFollette, & Hodgetts, 1994; Longenecker, McKinney, & Moore, 1989; Serwinek, 1992; Smith & Oakley, 1994). More recently, researchers have examined ethical variations among groups (e.g., gender, organizational size, functional activity, etc.), indicating a recognition that there is no universal perspective of ethics (Marta, Singhapakdi, & Kraft, 2008; Morris, Schindehutte, Walton, & Allen, 2002; Neubaum, Mitchell, & Schminke, 2004; Schminke, 2001). Some studies specifically examine instances in which legal boundaries have been crossed (Tonoyan, Strohmeyer, Habib, & Perlitz, 2010), the current investigation has chosen examples that are not illegal, but may be perceived as unethical in some contexts. What preceded our current research? There was a preliminary study (based on 30 respondents only) which was presented in 2007. Then in 2008 we presented a survey based on 16 more pages are available in the full version of this document, which may be purchased using the "Add to Cart" button on the product's webpage: www.igi-global.com/article/entrepreneurial-tricks-ethicssurveyed-different/58356?camid=4v1 This title is available in InfoSci-Journals, InfoSci-Journal Disciplines Business, Administration, and Management. Recommend this product to your librarian: www.igi-global.com/e-resources/libraryrecommendation/?id=2
不同国家的创业技巧与伦理调查
早期对创业伦理的研究集中在小企业主的态度上(Brown & King, 1982;Hornsby, Kuratko, Naffziger, LaFollette, & Hodgetts, 1994;Longenecker, McKinney, & Moore, 1989;Serwinek, 1992;Smith & Oakley, 1994)。最近,研究人员研究了群体之间的伦理差异(例如,性别,组织规模,职能活动等),表明认识到没有普遍的伦理观点(Marta, Singhapakdi, & Kraft, 2008;Morris, Schindehutte, Walton, & Allen, 2002;Neubaum, Mitchell, & Schminke, 2004;Schminke, 2001)。一些研究专门研究了跨越法律界限的情况(Tonoyan, Strohmeyer, Habib, & Perlitz, 2010),目前的调查选择了一些不违法的例子,但在某些情况下可能被认为是不道德的。在我们目前的研究之前是什么?2007年提出了一项初步研究(仅基于30个答复者)。然后在2008年,我们提出了一项基于另外16页的调查,这些调查可以在本文档的完整版本中获得,可以使用产品网页上的“添加到购物车”按钮购买:www.igi-global.com/article/entrepreneurial-tricks-ethicssurveyed-different/58356?camid=4v1本标题可在InfoSci-Journals, InfoSci-Journal journals, Business, Administration, and Management中找到。向您的图书管理员推荐此产品:www.igi-global.com/e-resources/libraryrecommendation/?id=2
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信