{"title":"The Semantics of Trwm in Middle Welsh Prose","authors":"E. Parina","doi":"10.54586/yqzf3383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Like its Goidelic cognate trom, analysed in Dereza (this volume), Welsh trwm is highly polysemous. In contrast to Dereza’s more general approach, I discuss here in detail the usage of this adjective in one relatively short period, based on the Welsh Prose 1300–1425 corpus (Luft et al. 2013). In order to make the Goidelic and Welsh data comparable, I analyse my data using the same classification of senses as Dereza. Despite some difficulties arising from the structure of the corpus used, I discuss the frequency of the usage within the four domains: experiential, parametrical, psycho-physiological and emotional. The last domain is the main focus of my attention due to the diversity of constructions in which trwm is thus used. I end by drawing some conclusions concerning the use of Celtic data in lexical typology.","PeriodicalId":370965,"journal":{"name":"Studia Celto-Slavica","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Celto-Slavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54586/yqzf3383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Like its Goidelic cognate trom, analysed in Dereza (this volume), Welsh trwm is highly polysemous. In contrast to Dereza’s more general approach, I discuss here in detail the usage of this adjective in one relatively short period, based on the Welsh Prose 1300–1425 corpus (Luft et al. 2013). In order to make the Goidelic and Welsh data comparable, I analyse my data using the same classification of senses as Dereza. Despite some difficulties arising from the structure of the corpus used, I discuss the frequency of the usage within the four domains: experiential, parametrical, psycho-physiological and emotional. The last domain is the main focus of my attention due to the diversity of constructions in which trwm is thus used. I end by drawing some conclusions concerning the use of Celtic data in lexical typology.
就像在Dereza(本卷)中分析的Goidelic同源词一样,威尔士语trwm具有高度的多义词。与Dereza的更一般的方法相反,我在这里详细讨论了这个形容词在一个相对较短的时期内的使用情况,基于1300-1425年的威尔士散文语料库(Luft et al. 2013)。为了使Goidelic和Welsh的数据具有可比性,我使用与Dereza相同的感官分类来分析我的数据。尽管使用语料库的结构引起了一些困难,但我在四个领域内讨论了使用频率:经验,参数化,心理生理和情感。最后一个领域是我关注的主要焦点,因为在这些领域中使用了trwm。我最后得出一些结论,关于使用凯尔特数据在词汇类型学。