From ‘herd immunity’ to ‘stay home’ to ‘stay alert’: United Kingdom’s response to COVID-19

R. Nartowski, Lucy Huby, R. Topham, Szymon Golen, Katrin Brückner, Gavin Hanigan, Hazim Saleem, I. Bielska, Paul Shepherd, S. Feltis
{"title":"From ‘herd immunity’ to ‘stay home’ to ‘stay alert’: United Kingdom’s response to COVID-19","authors":"R. Nartowski, Lucy Huby, R. Topham, Szymon Golen, Katrin Brückner, Gavin Hanigan, Hazim Saleem, I. Bielska, Paul Shepherd, S. Feltis","doi":"10.4467/20842627OZ.20.004.12658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in various public health responses around the globe. Due to the devolved powers of the United Kingdom, the response has been centralized but simultaneously greatly differing across England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. The following article examines the governmental responses to the outbreak, the public health measures taken, data collection and statistics, protective equipment and bed capacity, the society’s response, and lastly, the easing of the lockdown restrictions. In terms of the governmental response, the COVID-19 pandemic was initially met with less urgenon/populacy and social distancing, along with the development of herd immunity, were first mentioned. As the virus continued to spread, the government started imposing stricter measures and a lockdown was implemented. Tests were conducted using a five pillar typology. The collection of information, particularly on COVID-19 associated deaths, varied across the United Kingdom and among the governmental organizations due to differing definitions. In term of hospital bed availability, the rate of hospitalizations was the highest from late March to early April of 2020. Temporary hospitals were constructed, however, they mostly went unused. The United Kingdom society was generally compliant in adapting to the lockdown and trust in the government rose. Nonetheless, as the lockdown progressed, trust in the government began to fall. After several months, the rate of infection decreased and the lockdown in the United Kingdom was lifted in accordance with ‘Our plan to rebuild: The United Kingdom Government’s COVID-19 recovery strategy’. The slogan ‘Stay at Home. Protect the NHS. Save Lives’ was replaced with ‘Stay Alert. Control the Virus. Save Lives’.","PeriodicalId":139863,"journal":{"name":"Zdrowie Publiczne i Zarządzanie","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdrowie Publiczne i Zarządzanie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/20842627OZ.20.004.12658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in various public health responses around the globe. Due to the devolved powers of the United Kingdom, the response has been centralized but simultaneously greatly differing across England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. The following article examines the governmental responses to the outbreak, the public health measures taken, data collection and statistics, protective equipment and bed capacity, the society’s response, and lastly, the easing of the lockdown restrictions. In terms of the governmental response, the COVID-19 pandemic was initially met with less urgenon/populacy and social distancing, along with the development of herd immunity, were first mentioned. As the virus continued to spread, the government started imposing stricter measures and a lockdown was implemented. Tests were conducted using a five pillar typology. The collection of information, particularly on COVID-19 associated deaths, varied across the United Kingdom and among the governmental organizations due to differing definitions. In term of hospital bed availability, the rate of hospitalizations was the highest from late March to early April of 2020. Temporary hospitals were constructed, however, they mostly went unused. The United Kingdom society was generally compliant in adapting to the lockdown and trust in the government rose. Nonetheless, as the lockdown progressed, trust in the government began to fall. After several months, the rate of infection decreased and the lockdown in the United Kingdom was lifted in accordance with ‘Our plan to rebuild: The United Kingdom Government’s COVID-19 recovery strategy’. The slogan ‘Stay at Home. Protect the NHS. Save Lives’ was replaced with ‘Stay Alert. Control the Virus. Save Lives’.
从“群体免疫”到“待在家里”再到“保持警惕”:英国对COVID-19的反应
2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的爆发导致全球各地采取了各种公共卫生应对措施。由于联合王国的权力下放,反应一直是集中的,但同时在英格兰、威尔士、苏格兰和北爱尔兰有很大的不同。以下文章探讨了政府对疫情的反应、采取的公共卫生措施、数据收集和统计、防护设备和床位容量、社会的反应,以及最后放宽封锁限制。在政府应对方面,COVID-19大流行最初的紧迫性/人口和社会距离,以及群体免疫的发展,首先被提到。随着病毒的持续传播,政府开始采取更严格的措施,并实施了封锁。使用五柱类型进行测试。由于不同的定义,英国各地和政府组织收集的信息,特别是关于COVID-19相关死亡的信息,各不相同。在医院床位供应方面,2020年3月底至4月初的住院率最高。临时医院也建了起来,但大多没有使用。英国社会对封锁的适应总体上是顺从的,对政府的信任度上升。尽管如此,随着封锁的进行,人们对政府的信任开始下降。几个月后,感染率下降,根据“我们的重建计划:英国政府的COVID-19恢复战略”,英国解除了封锁。口号是“待在家里”。保护NHS。“拯救生命”被“保持警惕”取代。控制病毒拯救生命”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信