Evaluation of Post-Cementation Sensitivity After Cementation with Bio-Active Luting Cement - A Randomized Clinical Control Trial

{"title":"Evaluation of Post-Cementation Sensitivity After Cementation with Bio-Active Luting Cement - A Randomized Clinical Control Trial","authors":"","doi":"10.26463/rjds.15_1_14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The most common complaint following cementation is the occurrence of post cementation sensitivity. The sensitivity to cold stimulus after cementation can be indicative of a gap present below the crown or a marginal gap connecting to opened tubules which emerge into the pulp. A pulp fluid outflow occurs as a result of the contraction of dentinal fluid in this gap which causes postoperative sensitivity. Thus luting agents should form complete seal between fabricated restoration and prepared tooth.Objectives The current study was conducted to clinically evaluate post-cementation hypersensitivity of bioactive luting cement in a randomized clinical control trial using resin modified glass ionomer cement RMGIC as the control.Methods According to standard tooth preparation protocol the teeth were prepared to receive Porcelain fused to metal PFM bridges on both sides of the mouth. PFM final restorations were cemented using Bioactive and RMGIC luting cement. Sensitivity was tested by using compressed airbiting pressure tests and cold water and was evaluated by using Schiff scale with 0-3 scores before cementation soon after cementation one week and three months post cementation.Results Almost all the patients responded to hypersensitivity at pre-cementation and baseline with compressed airbiting pressure tests and cold water. The sensitivity scores reduced over time one week and three months for both the luting agents.Conclusion Based on the results it can be concluded that the bioactive luting cement exhibited lesser sensitivity scores when compared to resin modified GIC luting cement.","PeriodicalId":155332,"journal":{"name":"RGUHS Journal of Dental Sciences","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RGUHS Journal of Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26463/rjds.15_1_14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The most common complaint following cementation is the occurrence of post cementation sensitivity. The sensitivity to cold stimulus after cementation can be indicative of a gap present below the crown or a marginal gap connecting to opened tubules which emerge into the pulp. A pulp fluid outflow occurs as a result of the contraction of dentinal fluid in this gap which causes postoperative sensitivity. Thus luting agents should form complete seal between fabricated restoration and prepared tooth.Objectives The current study was conducted to clinically evaluate post-cementation hypersensitivity of bioactive luting cement in a randomized clinical control trial using resin modified glass ionomer cement RMGIC as the control.Methods According to standard tooth preparation protocol the teeth were prepared to receive Porcelain fused to metal PFM bridges on both sides of the mouth. PFM final restorations were cemented using Bioactive and RMGIC luting cement. Sensitivity was tested by using compressed airbiting pressure tests and cold water and was evaluated by using Schiff scale with 0-3 scores before cementation soon after cementation one week and three months post cementation.Results Almost all the patients responded to hypersensitivity at pre-cementation and baseline with compressed airbiting pressure tests and cold water. The sensitivity scores reduced over time one week and three months for both the luting agents.Conclusion Based on the results it can be concluded that the bioactive luting cement exhibited lesser sensitivity scores when compared to resin modified GIC luting cement.
评价生物活性Luting骨水泥固接后的敏感性-一项随机临床对照试验
背景:骨水泥术后最常见的症状是骨水泥后的敏感性。粘接后对冷刺激的敏感性可表明牙冠下方存在间隙或连接进入牙髓的开放小管的边缘间隙。牙本质液在间隙内收缩,导致术后敏感,导致牙髓液流出。因此,粘结剂应在制备的修复体和预备的牙齿之间形成完全的密封。本研究以树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀RMGIC为对照,通过随机临床对照试验,对生物活性芦丁水门汀骨水泥的骨水泥后超敏反应进行临床评价。方法按照标准的牙齿预备方案,在口腔两侧进行烤瓷金属烤瓷桥预备。PFM最终修复体采用生物活性骨水泥和RMGIC骨水泥。采用压缩空气咬压试验和冷水进行敏感性测试,并在胶结前1周内和胶结后3个月采用希夫评分(0-3分)进行敏感性评估。结果几乎所有患者在骨水泥前和基线时均有压缩空气咬压试验和冷水反应。两种药物的敏感性评分随着时间的推移(一周和三个月)而降低。结论与树脂改性GIC骨水泥相比,生物活性骨水泥的敏感性评分较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信