Why Community Based Micro Financing Have Very High Recovery Rates, More Efficient Utilization of the Benefits, and Higher Conversion Tendencies of Beneficiary Into Donors: The Mediatory Role of Social Collateral and Gratitude As Emotional Collateral in Community Organizations of Pakistan

Alamgir Khan, D. Siddiqui
{"title":"Why Community Based Micro Financing Have Very High Recovery Rates, More Efficient Utilization of the Benefits, and Higher Conversion Tendencies of Beneficiary Into Donors: The Mediatory Role of Social Collateral and Gratitude As Emotional Collateral in Community Organizations of Pakistan","authors":"Alamgir Khan, D. Siddiqui","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3510537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is an increasing role of community welfare organizations as well as NGOs and microfinance institutions in uplifting of poverty. These institutions lately gained financial sustainability as well as immense growth, thereby providing benefits to society from their own resources without relying upon financial support from government. This is mainly due to a very high recovery rate in community-based micro-financing, Efficient Utilization of the Benefits, and higher Conversion tendencies of Beneficiaries into Donors. In this case, it’s a win-win situation for both beneficiaries as well as NGOs in terms of NGOs improving their profile through Minimize risk of defaults, and society benefits from better utilization of the funds. Numerous studies have been conducted on the social and financial impact of community development programs on poor people's lives. The literature so far didn’t explain the psychological impact of these programs. We proposed a theoretical framework linking various religious, cultural, organizational and human factors of the beneficiary, to the efficient utilization of the benefit provided by community or NGO by the beneficiary and their potential conversion from the beneficiary to donor/benefits contributor. Religious factors include a prohibition of interest, group’s Shared believes, spirituality and believing that God would repay the good deeds. This will influence the beneficiary’s pro-social behaviors. Human Factors mainly focused on the sense of responsibility and Psychological attachment towards others. Cultural Factors and Value mainly focused on following societal and collective interests. These include collectivism, Uncertainty avoidance, and pro-social values. And lastly, Community Organization's ethical Image also plays a role in efficient utilization and prompt recovery. These Factors are inculcated in the beneficiary’s mind and motivate him to become donors/givers. The theory also proposed that these factors affect the beneficiary’s performance of the benefits provided by the community or NGO through collaterals. \n \nThese collaterals could be in the form of: \n1. Physical i.e. assets taken by the organization to ensure better utilization of loans or benefits. \n2. Social in terms of peer/community pressure as well as the threat of withdrawal from the community, and \n3. Emotional collateral in the form an arising the feeling of gratitude and paying back that emerge with someone provide favor to them. \n \nThese collaterals not only ensure optimal utilization of benefits/loans with extremely high recovery rates but also encourage the beneficiary to convert into donors and providing helping hands to others. To empirically establish its validity, we apply this model to a sample size of 115 respondents that were selected from beneficiaries of three leading organizations by means of a close-ended questionnaire. The data was later analyzed using structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis. The results clearly validated the theory that societal and collective culture and Religious Believes and Spirituality did not directly affect either Benefiter Performance, or the tendency of them to be Converted To Donor, but through the mediatory role of both gratitude (emotional) and social collateral. Culture and religion have a positive and significant effect on both forms of collaterals, moreover, emotional collateral significantly affects both performance and conversion to donors. However, Social collateral inversely and significantly affect conversion to donors and its effect on performance remained insignificant. Human factors and Organization's ethical Image didn’t seem to have any significant effect on performance and conversion directly or through the mediatory role of social and emotional collateral. With the exception that the organization’s image does effect benefiter performance significantly. Hence this implies that emotional collateral in the form of gratitude has a more pronounced effect on both performance and conversion as compared to social collateral. Moreover, cultural and religious factors are the dominating factors of performance and conversion as compared to human and organizational factors.","PeriodicalId":112052,"journal":{"name":"Organizations & Markets: Formal & Informal Structures eJournal","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizations & Markets: Formal & Informal Structures eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3510537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is an increasing role of community welfare organizations as well as NGOs and microfinance institutions in uplifting of poverty. These institutions lately gained financial sustainability as well as immense growth, thereby providing benefits to society from their own resources without relying upon financial support from government. This is mainly due to a very high recovery rate in community-based micro-financing, Efficient Utilization of the Benefits, and higher Conversion tendencies of Beneficiaries into Donors. In this case, it’s a win-win situation for both beneficiaries as well as NGOs in terms of NGOs improving their profile through Minimize risk of defaults, and society benefits from better utilization of the funds. Numerous studies have been conducted on the social and financial impact of community development programs on poor people's lives. The literature so far didn’t explain the psychological impact of these programs. We proposed a theoretical framework linking various religious, cultural, organizational and human factors of the beneficiary, to the efficient utilization of the benefit provided by community or NGO by the beneficiary and their potential conversion from the beneficiary to donor/benefits contributor. Religious factors include a prohibition of interest, group’s Shared believes, spirituality and believing that God would repay the good deeds. This will influence the beneficiary’s pro-social behaviors. Human Factors mainly focused on the sense of responsibility and Psychological attachment towards others. Cultural Factors and Value mainly focused on following societal and collective interests. These include collectivism, Uncertainty avoidance, and pro-social values. And lastly, Community Organization's ethical Image also plays a role in efficient utilization and prompt recovery. These Factors are inculcated in the beneficiary’s mind and motivate him to become donors/givers. The theory also proposed that these factors affect the beneficiary’s performance of the benefits provided by the community or NGO through collaterals. These collaterals could be in the form of: 1. Physical i.e. assets taken by the organization to ensure better utilization of loans or benefits. 2. Social in terms of peer/community pressure as well as the threat of withdrawal from the community, and 3. Emotional collateral in the form an arising the feeling of gratitude and paying back that emerge with someone provide favor to them. These collaterals not only ensure optimal utilization of benefits/loans with extremely high recovery rates but also encourage the beneficiary to convert into donors and providing helping hands to others. To empirically establish its validity, we apply this model to a sample size of 115 respondents that were selected from beneficiaries of three leading organizations by means of a close-ended questionnaire. The data was later analyzed using structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis. The results clearly validated the theory that societal and collective culture and Religious Believes and Spirituality did not directly affect either Benefiter Performance, or the tendency of them to be Converted To Donor, but through the mediatory role of both gratitude (emotional) and social collateral. Culture and religion have a positive and significant effect on both forms of collaterals, moreover, emotional collateral significantly affects both performance and conversion to donors. However, Social collateral inversely and significantly affect conversion to donors and its effect on performance remained insignificant. Human factors and Organization's ethical Image didn’t seem to have any significant effect on performance and conversion directly or through the mediatory role of social and emotional collateral. With the exception that the organization’s image does effect benefiter performance significantly. Hence this implies that emotional collateral in the form of gratitude has a more pronounced effect on both performance and conversion as compared to social collateral. Moreover, cultural and religious factors are the dominating factors of performance and conversion as compared to human and organizational factors.
为什么基于社区的小额融资具有很高的回收率、更有效的效益利用和更高的受益人向捐助者的转化倾向:社会抵押品和感恩作为情感抵押品在巴基斯坦社区组织中的中介作用
社区福利组织以及非政府组织和小额供资机构在消除贫穷方面的作用越来越大。这些机构最近获得了财务上的可持续性和巨大的增长,从而在不依赖政府财政支持的情况下,利用自己的资源为社会提供了利益。这主要是由于社区小额供资的回收率非常高、效益的有效利用以及受益者转化为捐助者的趋势较高。在这种情况下,对于受益人和非政府组织来说,这是一种双赢的局面,因为非政府组织通过减少违约风险来提高自己的形象,而社会也因为更好地利用资金而受益。关于社区发展项目对穷人生活的社会和财政影响,已经进行了大量的研究。到目前为止,文献还没有解释这些节目对心理的影响。我们提出了一个理论框架,将受益人的各种宗教、文化、组织和人为因素与受益人对社区或非政府组织提供的利益的有效利用以及他们从受益人到捐助者/利益贡献者的潜在转变联系起来。宗教因素包括禁止利益,团体的共同信仰,灵性和相信上帝会报答善行。这会影响受益人的亲社会行为。人的因素主要集中在责任感和对他人的心理依恋。文化因素与价值主要关注以下社会和集体利益。这些包括集体主义、不确定性规避和亲社会价值观。最后,社区组织的道德形象也起到了有效利用和迅速恢复的作用。这些因素被灌输在受益人的脑海中,并激励他成为捐赠者/捐赠者。该理论还提出,这些因素会影响受益人对社区或非政府组织通过抵押品提供的利益的绩效。这些抵押品可以是:1。实物,即组织为确保更好地利用贷款或利益而采取的资产。2. 2 .社交方面,同伴/社区压力以及退出社区的威胁;情感附带的形式是感激和回报的感觉,当某人向他们提供帮助时出现。这些抵押品不仅确保了福利/贷款的最佳利用和极高的回收率,而且还鼓励受益人转变为捐助者并向他人伸出援助之手。为了实证验证该模型的有效性,我们采用封闭式问卷调查的方式,将该模型应用于从三家领先组织的受益人中选出的115名受访者的样本量。随后使用结构方程模型和验证性因子分析对数据进行分析。结果清楚地验证了社会和集体文化、宗教信仰和灵性并不直接影响捐赠者的表现,也不直接影响他们转变为捐赠者的倾向,而是通过感恩(情感)和社会附带的中介作用。文化和宗教对两种形式的担保均有显著的正向影响,情感担保对绩效和向捐赠者的转化均有显著影响。然而,社会附带条件对向捐助者的转化产生负向和显著的影响,其对绩效的影响仍然不显著。人的因素和组织的道德形象似乎没有直接或通过社会和情感附带的中介作用对绩效和转换产生显著影响。除了组织的形象确实会显著影响受益者的表现。因此,这意味着以感激为形式的情感附带比社会附带对表现和转换都有更明显的影响。此外,与人为因素和组织因素相比,文化和宗教因素是绩效和转换的主导因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信