Lugar e funções psicológica e educacional da Criatividade no currículo implementado da educação pré-escolar e do ensino básico: Contributos de um grupo de discussão focalizada com docentes portugueses

Andreia Valquaresma, Joaquim Luís Coimbra
{"title":"Lugar e funções psicológica e educacional da Criatividade no currículo implementado da educação pré-escolar e do ensino básico: Contributos de um grupo de discussão focalizada com docentes portugueses","authors":"Andreia Valquaresma, Joaquim Luís Coimbra","doi":"10.36367/ntqr.7.2021.386-395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Resumo: Nos últimos tempos têm vindo a multiplicar-se as orientações quanto à urgência de se considerar a criatividade como um objetivo vital para a educação de futuro. Os sistemas educativos ocidentais lutam para se (re)inventarem e tornarem capazes de dar uma resposta adequada às exigências de renovação e de acrescida eficácia das sociedades contemporâneas. Apesar do reconhecimento da importância de incluir a criatividade nos curricula educativos, a maioria tende a reconhecê-la de uma forma implícita e pouco diferenciada quanto à sua conceptualização e operacionalização no âmbito da intervenção educativa. Com o intuito de contribuir para esta discussão, propusemo-nos analisar criticamente a abordagem da criatividade nos curricula da educação pré-escolar e do Abstract: Guidelines asserting the urgency of addressing creativity as a vital goal for the future of education have been multiplying in recent years. Western education systems struggle to (re)invent themselves and become capable of adequately responding to the demands for renewal and increased efficacy of contemporary societies. Despite agreeing on the importance of including creativity in educational curricula , most tend to acknowledge it in an implicit and ill-defined way in terms of its conceptualization and operationalization within the scope of educational interventions. Aiming to contribute to this discussion, we sought to critically analyse the approach to creativity in the Pre-school and Basic education curricula in Portugal, equating the implications of this framework regarding teachers’ pedagogical practices in the classroom. Through a focus group interview session with six teachers and the subsequent content analysis of the session, we explored their perceptions about creativity and how it was (or not) fostered by school curricula . Our main findings underline a consensus regarding the relevance of promoting creativity in educational contexts, despite the disarticulation between school curricula and pedagogical practices associated with creativity. A plethora of factors contribute to this, including difficulties in reconciling the pressure associated with educational marks with creativity development goals, the complexity of the creativity construct itself, the crystallization of practices of the teaching class, gaps in their training, or even social and cultural prejudices around creativity. Beyond the possible social and cultural repercussions, these results can contribute to defining curricula based on pedagogical strategies better able to nourish the holistic development of creativity in children and adolescents.","PeriodicalId":405656,"journal":{"name":"Investigação Qualitativa em Educação: Avanços e Desafios | Investigación Cualitativa en Educación: Avances y Desafíos","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigação Qualitativa em Educação: Avanços e Desafios | Investigación Cualitativa en Educación: Avances y Desafíos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.7.2021.386-395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Resumo: Nos últimos tempos têm vindo a multiplicar-se as orientações quanto à urgência de se considerar a criatividade como um objetivo vital para a educação de futuro. Os sistemas educativos ocidentais lutam para se (re)inventarem e tornarem capazes de dar uma resposta adequada às exigências de renovação e de acrescida eficácia das sociedades contemporâneas. Apesar do reconhecimento da importância de incluir a criatividade nos curricula educativos, a maioria tende a reconhecê-la de uma forma implícita e pouco diferenciada quanto à sua conceptualização e operacionalização no âmbito da intervenção educativa. Com o intuito de contribuir para esta discussão, propusemo-nos analisar criticamente a abordagem da criatividade nos curricula da educação pré-escolar e do Abstract: Guidelines asserting the urgency of addressing creativity as a vital goal for the future of education have been multiplying in recent years. Western education systems struggle to (re)invent themselves and become capable of adequately responding to the demands for renewal and increased efficacy of contemporary societies. Despite agreeing on the importance of including creativity in educational curricula , most tend to acknowledge it in an implicit and ill-defined way in terms of its conceptualization and operationalization within the scope of educational interventions. Aiming to contribute to this discussion, we sought to critically analyse the approach to creativity in the Pre-school and Basic education curricula in Portugal, equating the implications of this framework regarding teachers’ pedagogical practices in the classroom. Through a focus group interview session with six teachers and the subsequent content analysis of the session, we explored their perceptions about creativity and how it was (or not) fostered by school curricula . Our main findings underline a consensus regarding the relevance of promoting creativity in educational contexts, despite the disarticulation between school curricula and pedagogical practices associated with creativity. A plethora of factors contribute to this, including difficulties in reconciling the pressure associated with educational marks with creativity development goals, the complexity of the creativity construct itself, the crystallization of practices of the teaching class, gaps in their training, or even social and cultural prejudices around creativity. Beyond the possible social and cultural repercussions, these results can contribute to defining curricula based on pedagogical strategies better able to nourish the holistic development of creativity in children and adolescents.
创造力在学前教育和基础教育实施课程中的地位、心理和教育功能:葡萄牙教师焦点小组的贡献
摘要:近年来,越来越多的指导方针认为创造力是未来教育的重要目标。西方的教育体系努力(重新)创造自己,并使其能够充分响应当代社会更新和提高效率的要求。尽管认识到将创造力纳入教育课程的重要性,但大多数人倾向于以一种含蓄的方式认识创造力,在教育干预的背景下,对创造力的概念化和操作化几乎没有区别。为了对这一讨论做出贡献,我们建议批判性地分析学前教育课程中的创造力方法,以及《摘要:指导方针》,该指导方针指出,近年来,解决创造力作为未来教育的重要目标的紧迫性已成倍增加。西方教育体系努力(重新)改造自身,并能够充分响应更新和提高当代社会效能的需求。尽管同意将创造性纳入教育课程的重要性,但大多数人在教育干预范围内对创造性的概念化和操作化方面,倾向于以一种隐含的、定义不明确的方式认识到创造性。为了对这一讨论作出贡献,我们希望批判性地分析葡萄牙学前和基础教育课程中的创造性方法,考虑到这一框架对教师课堂教学实践的影响。通过对六位教师的焦点小组访谈和随后的内容分析,我们探讨了他们对创造力的看法,以及学校课程是如何培养创造力的。我们的主要调查结果表明,尽管学校课程与与创造性有关的教学实践之间存在脱节,但关于在教育环境中促进创造性的相关性的共识。造成这种情况的因素很多,包括难以协调与教育标志和创造力发展目标相关的压力、创造力本身的复杂性、课堂实践的结晶、培训方面的差距,甚至围绕创造力的社会和文化障碍。除了可能产生的社会和文化影响之外,这些结果还有助于确定以教学策略为基础的课程,以便更好地培养儿童和青少年创造力的整体发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信