Generalised Cost Function of Integrated Multimodal Transport

Paritosh Nandi, G. Sierpiński
{"title":"Generalised Cost Function of Integrated Multimodal Transport","authors":"Paritosh Nandi, G. Sierpiński","doi":"10.11159/iccefa21.132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extended Abstract To develop and implement Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs) [1] planners in the European Union (EU) usually apply participatory approaches involving interdisciplinary planning teams with transport planners, urban designers, environment experts, as well as decision-makers, urban transport and mobility practitioners, citizens and other stakeholders. To evaluate the effect of SUMPs, the EU sets measurement goals derived from local or national objectives and adopts routine monitoring and assessment activities. In line with this broad-based approach this paper will investigate the integration of multimodal transport system in the EU in particular. Building missing links at borders between the EU Member States and the main European routes, removing bottlenecks of network interconnections or the terminal modes are important to the European Single market [2]. Moving infrastructure to digital mobility patterns, and technology implementation for renewable fuels might impose additional burden in terms of new investment in multimodal network and its holistic integration. Heeres et al [3] established a conceptual structure for differentiating varying degrees in a ‘solution space’ method in the projects of transport integration. They thought that sector-internal integration is a multimodal one with connected nodes and interlinking of local and regional level networks. More cost-effective external integration explicitly extends the scope of improving connectivity to other interconnected transit networks and other parameters such as place of residence, leisure activities, and the environment. This article also investigates the current renewable energy deployment pattern in Europe which needs an infrastructural change to tempt the private and public owners to deploy higher amount of renewable energy. Therefore the notion of multimodal integration is heavily dependent on the investment in infrastructure but the right kind of incentive to renewable energy will act in favour of the governmental goals and priorities. Particularly the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) [4] needs new investment infrastructure, renovation and modernization of the already existing network. This article finally investigates the generalized cost functions and constraints of multimodal transport and travellers’ choice taking into account the entire landscape of infrastructural changes required for the above-mentioned parameters and how this cost function plays out optimally across these factors.","PeriodicalId":299969,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 2nd the International Conference on Civil Engineering Fundamentals and Applications (ICCEFA'21)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 2nd the International Conference on Civil Engineering Fundamentals and Applications (ICCEFA'21)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11159/iccefa21.132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extended Abstract To develop and implement Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs) [1] planners in the European Union (EU) usually apply participatory approaches involving interdisciplinary planning teams with transport planners, urban designers, environment experts, as well as decision-makers, urban transport and mobility practitioners, citizens and other stakeholders. To evaluate the effect of SUMPs, the EU sets measurement goals derived from local or national objectives and adopts routine monitoring and assessment activities. In line with this broad-based approach this paper will investigate the integration of multimodal transport system in the EU in particular. Building missing links at borders between the EU Member States and the main European routes, removing bottlenecks of network interconnections or the terminal modes are important to the European Single market [2]. Moving infrastructure to digital mobility patterns, and technology implementation for renewable fuels might impose additional burden in terms of new investment in multimodal network and its holistic integration. Heeres et al [3] established a conceptual structure for differentiating varying degrees in a ‘solution space’ method in the projects of transport integration. They thought that sector-internal integration is a multimodal one with connected nodes and interlinking of local and regional level networks. More cost-effective external integration explicitly extends the scope of improving connectivity to other interconnected transit networks and other parameters such as place of residence, leisure activities, and the environment. This article also investigates the current renewable energy deployment pattern in Europe which needs an infrastructural change to tempt the private and public owners to deploy higher amount of renewable energy. Therefore the notion of multimodal integration is heavily dependent on the investment in infrastructure but the right kind of incentive to renewable energy will act in favour of the governmental goals and priorities. Particularly the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) [4] needs new investment infrastructure, renovation and modernization of the already existing network. This article finally investigates the generalized cost functions and constraints of multimodal transport and travellers’ choice taking into account the entire landscape of infrastructural changes required for the above-mentioned parameters and how this cost function plays out optimally across these factors.
综合多式联运的广义成本函数
为了制定和实施可持续城市交通规划(SUMPs)[1],欧盟(EU)的规划者通常采用参与式方法,包括跨学科规划团队,包括交通规划者、城市设计师、环境专家、决策者、城市交通和交通从业者、公民和其他利益相关者。为了评估sump的效果,欧盟根据地方或国家目标设定了衡量目标,并采取例行监测和评估活动。根据这种基础广泛的方法,本文将特别研究欧盟多式联运系统的整合。建立欧盟成员国与欧洲主要航线之间的边界缺失环节,消除网络互联或终端模式的瓶颈,对欧洲单一市场具有重要意义[2]。将基础设施转移到数字移动模式,以及可再生燃料的技术实施,可能会给多式联运网络的新投资及其整体整合带来额外负担。Heeres等人[3]在交通一体化项目中建立了一种“解空间”方法区分不同程度的概念结构。他们认为,部门内部整合是一个多模式的节点连接和相互链接的地方和区域层面的网络。更具成本效益的外部整合明确扩展了改善其他互联交通网络和其他参数(如居住地、休闲活动和环境)的连通性的范围。本文还研究了欧洲目前的可再生能源部署模式,该模式需要基础设施变革,以吸引私人和公共所有者部署更多的可再生能源。因此,多模式整合的概念在很大程度上依赖于对基础设施的投资,但对可再生能源的正确激励将有利于政府的目标和优先事项。特别是泛欧交通网(TEN-T)[4]需要新的投资基础设施、改造和现有网络的现代化。本文最后研究了多式联运的广义成本函数和约束,考虑到上述参数所需的基础设施变化的整体景观,以及该成本函数如何在这些因素中发挥最佳效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信