«LEGITIMATE RIGHT» TO LOOT: THE DISTRIBUTION OF WAR BOOTY AND ROMAN CIVITAS OF THE REPUBLIC

M. Rastegaeva
{"title":"«LEGITIMATE RIGHT» TO LOOT: THE DISTRIBUTION OF WAR BOOTY AND ROMAN CIVITAS OF THE REPUBLIC","authors":"M. Rastegaeva","doi":"10.18500/0320-961x-2023-21-110-139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the article examines the distribution and use of war booty in the Roman Republic. In spite of quite extensive historiography on this question, scholars as a rule focused their interest on the role of the commander in the process of dividing the loot, and the collective of citizens of the Roman state, which also claimed part of the loot, unreasonably remained without required attention. Therefore the article analyzes the parts of the Roman civitas, among which the spoils of war were distributed, namely, the commander, the soldiers and the treasury. Besides the desire of each of the parties to get their «legitimate» part of the loot inevitably led to a number of conflicts, which were later reflected in the literary tradition. Based on the information from narrative sources, author of the article highlights not the economic, but the political and ideological aspects of the problem – how the distribution of loot was carried out, what traditions were formed for this procedure, whether there was any law, what social contradictions were in the division of the loot, what ideas are associated with this process and what place civil community is occupied in the distribution of the spoils of war. Discussion of all these issues allows us to create an idea of the role that war booty played in the economy of the Roman Republic; in particular, the article reveals the issues of the relations between war booty and tax system. In addition, the article presents a number of important remarks on the interrelation of the commander, the army and the state treasury, which were the main players in the process of dividing the spoils of war. The article concludes that in Rome, until the end of the Republic, there was no universal norm of law which would regulate the processes of distribution of war booty; it is more likely to claim that there is some tradition which took into account the interests of all parties and changed with the development of Roman statehood.","PeriodicalId":331199,"journal":{"name":"Ancient World and Archaeology","volume":"47 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ancient World and Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18500/0320-961x-2023-21-110-139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

the article examines the distribution and use of war booty in the Roman Republic. In spite of quite extensive historiography on this question, scholars as a rule focused their interest on the role of the commander in the process of dividing the loot, and the collective of citizens of the Roman state, which also claimed part of the loot, unreasonably remained without required attention. Therefore the article analyzes the parts of the Roman civitas, among which the spoils of war were distributed, namely, the commander, the soldiers and the treasury. Besides the desire of each of the parties to get their «legitimate» part of the loot inevitably led to a number of conflicts, which were later reflected in the literary tradition. Based on the information from narrative sources, author of the article highlights not the economic, but the political and ideological aspects of the problem – how the distribution of loot was carried out, what traditions were formed for this procedure, whether there was any law, what social contradictions were in the division of the loot, what ideas are associated with this process and what place civil community is occupied in the distribution of the spoils of war. Discussion of all these issues allows us to create an idea of the role that war booty played in the economy of the Roman Republic; in particular, the article reveals the issues of the relations between war booty and tax system. In addition, the article presents a number of important remarks on the interrelation of the commander, the army and the state treasury, which were the main players in the process of dividing the spoils of war. The article concludes that in Rome, until the end of the Republic, there was no universal norm of law which would regulate the processes of distribution of war booty; it is more likely to claim that there is some tradition which took into account the interests of all parties and changed with the development of Roman statehood.
掠夺的“合法权利”:共和国战争战利品和罗马平民的分配
本文考察了罗马共和国战争战利品的分配和使用。尽管关于这个问题的史学研究相当广泛,但学者们通常把兴趣集中在指挥官在分配战利品过程中的作用上,而罗马国家的公民集体也要求获得部分战利品,却不合理地没有得到关注。因此,本文分析了罗马公民的部分,其中分配的战利品,即指挥官,士兵和国库。此外,每一方都希望得到他们“合法”的那部分战利品,这不可避免地导致了一些冲突,这些冲突后来反映在文学传统中。基于叙述来源的信息,本文作者强调的不是经济方面的问题,而是政治和意识形态方面的问题——战利品的分配是如何进行的,这一程序形成了什么传统,是否有任何法律,在战利品的分配中存在什么社会矛盾,与这一过程相关的思想是什么,以及民间社会在战利品的分配中占据了什么位置。对这些问题的讨论让我们对战利品在罗马共和国经济中所扮演的角色有了一个概念;文章特别揭示了战利品与税收制度的关系问题。此外,文章还对在瓜分战利品的过程中起主要作用的指挥官、军队和国库之间的相互关系作了一些重要的评论。这篇文章的结论是,在罗马,直到共和国结束,没有一个普遍的法律规范来规范战争战利品的分配过程;更有可能的说法是,有一些传统考虑了各方的利益,并随着罗马国家的发展而改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信