mm-Wave Single-Pole Double-Throw switches: HBT- vs MOSFET-based designs

M. Margalef-Rovira, C. Gaquière, A. A. L. Souza, L. Vincent, M. Barragán, E. Pistono, F. Podevin, P. Ferrari
{"title":"mm-Wave Single-Pole Double-Throw switches: HBT- vs MOSFET-based designs","authors":"M. Margalef-Rovira, C. Gaquière, A. A. L. Souza, L. Vincent, M. Barragán, E. Pistono, F. Podevin, P. Ferrari","doi":"10.1109/NEWCAS50681.2021.9462753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to compare the performance of HBT-based and MOSFET-based mm-Wave SPDT switches in a single BiCMOS technology. To the best of authors’ knowledge, a direct comparison of this function in the same integrated process has never been reported before. Measurement results on two 50-GHz integrated SPDTs reveal that the HBT-based SPDT switch yields 1.7 dB of insertion loss and 14 dB of isolation in its central frequency, with a bandwidth covering the 30-80 GHz frequency range when considering a return loss greater than 10 dB. On the other hand, the MOSFET-based SPDT switch yields 2.1 dB of insertion loss and 12 dB of isolation at center frequency and a bandwidth covering the 33-80 GHz frequency range.","PeriodicalId":373745,"journal":{"name":"2021 19th IEEE International New Circuits and Systems Conference (NEWCAS)","volume":"21 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 19th IEEE International New Circuits and Systems Conference (NEWCAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NEWCAS50681.2021.9462753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to compare the performance of HBT-based and MOSFET-based mm-Wave SPDT switches in a single BiCMOS technology. To the best of authors’ knowledge, a direct comparison of this function in the same integrated process has never been reported before. Measurement results on two 50-GHz integrated SPDTs reveal that the HBT-based SPDT switch yields 1.7 dB of insertion loss and 14 dB of isolation in its central frequency, with a bandwidth covering the 30-80 GHz frequency range when considering a return loss greater than 10 dB. On the other hand, the MOSFET-based SPDT switch yields 2.1 dB of insertion loss and 12 dB of isolation at center frequency and a bandwidth covering the 33-80 GHz frequency range.
毫米波单极双掷开关:基于HBT与基于mosfet的设计
本文旨在比较基于hbt和基于mosfet的毫米波SPDT开关在单一BiCMOS技术下的性能。据作者所知,在相同的综合过程中,这种功能的直接比较以前从未有过报道。在两个50 GHz集成SPDT上的测量结果表明,基于hbt的SPDT开关在其中心频率产生1.7 dB的插入损耗和14 dB的隔离,在考虑大于10 dB的回波损耗时,带宽覆盖30-80 GHz频率范围。另一方面,基于mosfet的SPDT开关在中心频率产生2.1 dB的插入损耗和12 dB的隔离,带宽覆盖33-80 GHz频率范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信