Re-Thinking Group Development in Adventure Programming: A Qualitative Examination

Levi A. Dexel, Bruce Martin, L. Black, Aiko Yoshino
{"title":"Re-Thinking Group Development in Adventure Programming: A Qualitative Examination","authors":"Levi A. Dexel, Bruce Martin, L. Black, Aiko Yoshino","doi":"10.1353/ROE.2010.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The purpose of the study was to re-examine the efficacy of Tuckman’s (1965) model of group development in adventure programming. More specifically, the researchers were interested in comparing Tuckman’s traditional sequential model to more contemporary non-sequential and integrative models that have emerged as alternative ways to conceptualize the process of group development. The researchers used a case study approach (Merriam, 2001) and techniques characteristic of naturalistic inquiry (Lincoln & Guba, 1985) to explore the nature of group development among participants in a weeklong sea kayaking expedition. The researchers concluded that more contemporary models of group development more accurately explained the process of group development in this case study than Tuckman’s (1965) traditional model of group development.","PeriodicalId":269462,"journal":{"name":"Research in Outdoor Education","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Outdoor Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ROE.2010.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of the study was to re-examine the efficacy of Tuckman’s (1965) model of group development in adventure programming. More specifically, the researchers were interested in comparing Tuckman’s traditional sequential model to more contemporary non-sequential and integrative models that have emerged as alternative ways to conceptualize the process of group development. The researchers used a case study approach (Merriam, 2001) and techniques characteristic of naturalistic inquiry (Lincoln & Guba, 1985) to explore the nature of group development among participants in a weeklong sea kayaking expedition. The researchers concluded that more contemporary models of group development more accurately explained the process of group development in this case study than Tuckman’s (1965) traditional model of group development.
重新思考冒险规划中的群体发展:一个定性的检验
摘要:本研究的目的是重新检验塔克曼(1965)的冒险节目群体发展模型的有效性。更具体地说,研究人员感兴趣的是比较塔克曼的传统顺序模型和更现代的非顺序和综合模型,这些模型已经成为概念化群体发展过程的替代方法。研究人员使用案例研究法(Merriam, 2001)和自然主义探究的技术特征(Lincoln & Guba, 1985)来探索为期一周的海上皮划艇探险参与者群体发展的本质。研究人员得出结论,在本案例研究中,与Tuckman(1965)的传统群体发展模型相比,更现代的群体发展模型更准确地解释了群体发展过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信