Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Single Surgeon’s Experience with 527 Consecutive Patients

A. Bedirli, A. Yavuz, K. Dikmen, Cagri Buyukkasap, Safa Ozaydin
{"title":"Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Single Surgeon’s Experience with 527 Consecutive Patients","authors":"A. Bedirli, A. Yavuz, K. Dikmen, Cagri Buyukkasap, Safa Ozaydin","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2021.00072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: Robotic bariatric surgery is increasingly adopted by surgeons. We present the surgical results of 527 consecutive patients who underwent robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) using the standard technique. Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed including 527 consecutive patients who underwent robotic RYGB between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2021. Results: The mean age of the patients was 41 years, with a male/female sex distribution of 143/384 (27.1%/72.9%). Type 2 diabetes in the pre-operative period was diagnosed in 31% of patients. The median pre-operative body mass index (BMI) was 44.6 kg/m2 (range, 35–64). The mean operation time was 134 min for robotic RYGB, including the docking process. Early (< 30 days) complications included ileus (0.2%), atelectasis (0.2%), thromboembolic (0.2%) events, and surgical-site infection (0.2%). No leakage or bleeding of the gastrojejunal and jejunojejunal anastomoses were recorded. Oral food intake was begun at 1.8 days on average. The average hospital stay was 2 days. Despite a range of BMI values, operation times and gastrojejunal anastomosis times did not show significant differences. There were no significant differences in mean operation time or mean gastrojejunal anastomosis time over the years. Conclusions: The robotic approach is effective and safe for patients undergoing RYGB. This technique provides satisfactory results with short-term surgical outcomes. However, the real benefits of robotic RYGB should be further evaluated by well-conducted randomized trials. Even in difficult cases with higher BMI values, optimal operation times and similar operative efficiency can be obtained if a standard operation technique is applied.","PeriodicalId":114569,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons","volume":"30 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2021.00072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Robotic bariatric surgery is increasingly adopted by surgeons. We present the surgical results of 527 consecutive patients who underwent robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) using the standard technique. Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed including 527 consecutive patients who underwent robotic RYGB between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2021. Results: The mean age of the patients was 41 years, with a male/female sex distribution of 143/384 (27.1%/72.9%). Type 2 diabetes in the pre-operative period was diagnosed in 31% of patients. The median pre-operative body mass index (BMI) was 44.6 kg/m2 (range, 35–64). The mean operation time was 134 min for robotic RYGB, including the docking process. Early (< 30 days) complications included ileus (0.2%), atelectasis (0.2%), thromboembolic (0.2%) events, and surgical-site infection (0.2%). No leakage or bleeding of the gastrojejunal and jejunojejunal anastomoses were recorded. Oral food intake was begun at 1.8 days on average. The average hospital stay was 2 days. Despite a range of BMI values, operation times and gastrojejunal anastomosis times did not show significant differences. There were no significant differences in mean operation time or mean gastrojejunal anastomosis time over the years. Conclusions: The robotic approach is effective and safe for patients undergoing RYGB. This technique provides satisfactory results with short-term surgical outcomes. However, the real benefits of robotic RYGB should be further evaluated by well-conducted randomized trials. Even in difficult cases with higher BMI values, optimal operation times and similar operative efficiency can be obtained if a standard operation technique is applied.
机器人Roux-en-Y胃旁路:527例连续患者的单个外科医生的经验
背景和目的:机器人减肥手术越来越多地被外科医生采用。我们介绍了527例使用标准技术连续接受机器人Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)的患者的手术结果。方法:对一个前瞻性维护的数据库进行回顾性分析,该数据库包括2018年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间接受机器人RYGB治疗的527例连续患者。结果:患者平均年龄41岁,男女性别分布143/384(27.1%/72.9%)。术前诊断为2型糖尿病的患者占31%。术前中位体重指数(BMI)为44.6 kg/m2(范围35-64)。机器人RYGB的平均操作时间为134分钟,包括对接过程。早期(< 30天)并发症包括肠梗阻(0.2%)、肺不张(0.2%)、血栓栓塞(0.2%)事件和手术部位感染(0.2%)。胃空肠及空肠吻合处未见渗漏或出血。平均在1.8天开始口服食物。平均住院时间为2天。在BMI值范围内,手术次数和胃空肠吻合次数无明显差异。两组间平均手术时间及胃空肠吻合时间无明显差异。结论:机器人入路对RYGB患者是安全有效的。该技术提供了令人满意的短期手术效果。然而,机器人RYGB的真正好处应该通过良好的随机试验进一步评估。即使在BMI值较高的困难病例中,如果采用标准的手术技术,也可以获得最佳的手术次数和相似的手术效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信