Changes in Security Policy and Perceptions of the Baltic States 2014 – 2016

Dovilė Jakniūnaitė
{"title":"Changes in Security Policy and Perceptions of the Baltic States 2014 – 2016","authors":"Dovilė Jakniūnaitė","doi":"10.1515/jobs-2016-0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article proposes the analytical review on what and how to think about the security of the Baltic States from 2014 till 2016 by evaluating and reflecting the main changes in their security policy and perceptions. These three years demonstrated that the perceptions about security itself have not changed much while comparing with the previous five years. The changes were mostly in the security measures. The security discourse intensified a lot also, which was significant not only for the internal civic mobilisation, but even more importantly, but even more importantly for the mobilisation of the attention of the partners and their increased commitment. I explain my argument in two steps: first, by using traditional - rationalists - questions to analyse security policy, and second, by discussing security perceptions and discourses and asking these questions: security “for whom”, security “from what”, and security “how”.","PeriodicalId":395627,"journal":{"name":"Journal on Baltic Security","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on Baltic Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jobs-2016-0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Abstract The article proposes the analytical review on what and how to think about the security of the Baltic States from 2014 till 2016 by evaluating and reflecting the main changes in their security policy and perceptions. These three years demonstrated that the perceptions about security itself have not changed much while comparing with the previous five years. The changes were mostly in the security measures. The security discourse intensified a lot also, which was significant not only for the internal civic mobilisation, but even more importantly, but even more importantly for the mobilisation of the attention of the partners and their increased commitment. I explain my argument in two steps: first, by using traditional - rationalists - questions to analyse security policy, and second, by discussing security perceptions and discourses and asking these questions: security “for whom”, security “from what”, and security “how”.
2014 - 2016年波罗的海国家安全政策和观念的变化
本文通过评价和反思波罗的海国家安全政策和观念的主要变化,对2014年至2016年波罗的海国家的安全问题进行了分析性回顾。这三年表明,与前五年相比,对安全本身的看法并没有太大变化。这些变化主要体现在安全措施上。安全讨论也加强了很多,这不仅对内部的公民动员很重要,而且更重要的是,对动员合作伙伴的注意力和他们增加的承诺更重要。我分两步解释我的论点:首先,用传统的理性主义者的问题来分析安全政策,其次,通过讨论安全观念和话语,并提出这些问题:安全“为谁”,安全“从什么”,安全“如何”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信