Serotyping of invasive and colonizing group B Streptococcus (GBS) isolates at selected hospitals in Sri Lanka: a multicenter study.

R. Chinthamani, S. Pathirage, Nambage Shirani Chandrasiri
{"title":"Serotyping of invasive and colonizing group B Streptococcus (GBS) isolates at selected hospitals in Sri Lanka: a multicenter study.","authors":"R. Chinthamani, S. Pathirage, Nambage Shirani Chandrasiri","doi":"10.4038/cmj.v66i3.9493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nGroup B Streptococcus (GBS) causes significant morbidity and mortality in neonates, pregnant women and patients with underlying comorbidities. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) is currently the mainstay of prevention and effective vaccine against invasive GBS disease is under clinical trial.\n\n\nObjectives\nTo describe the serotype distribution of invasive and colonizing GBS isolates in Sri Lanka.\n\n\nMethods\nProbable GBS isolates from high vaginal swabs (HVS) and sterile body sites were collected from eight selected hospital laboratories. Following confirmation of the identification as group B Streptococcus by phenotypic methods including Lancefield grouping test (Plasmatic UK), isolates were tested for serotyping by latex agglutination test kit (STATEN serum institute, Denmark).\n\n\nResults\nOut of the 145 probable GBS isolates only 100 from HVS and 37 from sterile body sites were confirmed as GBS. Serotype III was the most predominant in invasive GBS isolates followed by Ia, Ib, VI, II and V in the descending order of frequency. Serotype VI was the most predominant in HVS isolates followed by serotype III, V, Ia, II, Ib and IV. Difference of GBS serotype distribution between the invasive and HVS group was statistically significant (P value = 0.038).\n\n\nConclusion\nSerotype distribution pattern of the study isolates was comparable to most of the other developing and developed countries and hence will be beneficial in future vaccine introduction. GBS vaccine which is currently under clinical trial (Ia, Ib and III) is potentially effective for preventing 68% of the early onset disease in neonates in this study setting.","PeriodicalId":122256,"journal":{"name":"The Ceylon medical journal","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Ceylon medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/cmj.v66i3.9493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background Group B Streptococcus (GBS) causes significant morbidity and mortality in neonates, pregnant women and patients with underlying comorbidities. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) is currently the mainstay of prevention and effective vaccine against invasive GBS disease is under clinical trial. Objectives To describe the serotype distribution of invasive and colonizing GBS isolates in Sri Lanka. Methods Probable GBS isolates from high vaginal swabs (HVS) and sterile body sites were collected from eight selected hospital laboratories. Following confirmation of the identification as group B Streptococcus by phenotypic methods including Lancefield grouping test (Plasmatic UK), isolates were tested for serotyping by latex agglutination test kit (STATEN serum institute, Denmark). Results Out of the 145 probable GBS isolates only 100 from HVS and 37 from sterile body sites were confirmed as GBS. Serotype III was the most predominant in invasive GBS isolates followed by Ia, Ib, VI, II and V in the descending order of frequency. Serotype VI was the most predominant in HVS isolates followed by serotype III, V, Ia, II, Ib and IV. Difference of GBS serotype distribution between the invasive and HVS group was statistically significant (P value = 0.038). Conclusion Serotype distribution pattern of the study isolates was comparable to most of the other developing and developed countries and hence will be beneficial in future vaccine introduction. GBS vaccine which is currently under clinical trial (Ia, Ib and III) is potentially effective for preventing 68% of the early onset disease in neonates in this study setting.
斯里兰卡选定医院侵袭性和定植性B群链球菌(GBS)分离物的血清分型:一项多中心研究
背景B群链球菌(GBS)在新生儿、孕妇和有潜在合并症的患者中引起显著的发病率和死亡率。产时抗生素预防(IAP)是目前预防的主要方法,针对侵袭性GBS病的有效疫苗正在临床试验中。目的了解斯里兰卡GBS侵袭性和定殖性分离株的血清型分布。方法选择8家医院实验室,从高阴拭子(HVS)和无菌体部位采集可能的GBS分离株。在通过表型方法(包括Lancefield分组试验(Plasmatic UK))确认为B组链球菌后,使用乳胶凝集试验试剂盒(丹麦STATEN血清研究所)对分离株进行血清分型检测。结果145株疑似GBS分离株中,HVS分离株100株,无菌体表分离株37株。侵袭性GBS分离株以血清III型为主,其次为Ia型、Ib型、VI型、II型和V型。HVS分离株中以血清VI型为主,其次为血清III型、V型、Ia型、II型、Ib型和IV型。侵袭组与HVS组GBS血清型分布差异有统计学意义(P值= 0.038)。结论该研究分离株的血清型分布模式与大多数其他发展中国家和发达国家相当,因此对未来疫苗的引入有益。目前正在进行临床试验的GBS疫苗(Ia, Ib和III)在本研究环境中可能有效预防68%的新生儿早发性疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书