Equivalence checking combining a structural SAT-solver, BDDs, and simulation

Viresh Paruthi, A. Kuehlmann
{"title":"Equivalence checking combining a structural SAT-solver, BDDs, and simulation","authors":"Viresh Paruthi, A. Kuehlmann","doi":"10.1109/ICCD.2000.878323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a verification technique for functional comparison of large combinational circuits using a novel combination of known approaches. The idea is based on a tight integration of a structural satisfiability (SAT) solver, BDD sweeping, and random simulation; all three working on a shared graph representation of the circuit. The BDD sweeping and SAT solver are applied in an inter-twined manner both controlled by resource limits that are successively increased during each iteration. In this cooperative setting the BDD sweeping incrementally reduces the search space for the SAT solver until the problem is solved or the resource limits are exhausted. This approach improves on previous work in several ways: The integral application of the SAT solver significantly enhances the capacity and efficiency of BDD sweeping and extends its suitability for miscomparing designs. Further, the random simulation algorithm works on the compressed circuit graph and thus runs more efficiently. Our experiments demonstrate that the outlined approach is effective for a large class of equivalence checking instances by automatically adapting to the difficulty of the problem.","PeriodicalId":437697,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Computer Design","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"67","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Computer Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCD.2000.878323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 67

Abstract

This paper presents a verification technique for functional comparison of large combinational circuits using a novel combination of known approaches. The idea is based on a tight integration of a structural satisfiability (SAT) solver, BDD sweeping, and random simulation; all three working on a shared graph representation of the circuit. The BDD sweeping and SAT solver are applied in an inter-twined manner both controlled by resource limits that are successively increased during each iteration. In this cooperative setting the BDD sweeping incrementally reduces the search space for the SAT solver until the problem is solved or the resource limits are exhausted. This approach improves on previous work in several ways: The integral application of the SAT solver significantly enhances the capacity and efficiency of BDD sweeping and extends its suitability for miscomparing designs. Further, the random simulation algorithm works on the compressed circuit graph and thus runs more efficiently. Our experiments demonstrate that the outlined approach is effective for a large class of equivalence checking instances by automatically adapting to the difficulty of the problem.
结合结构sat求解器、bdd和仿真的等效性检查
本文提出了一种验证技术,用于大型组合电路的功能比较,使用已知方法的新组合。这个想法是基于结构满意度(SAT)求解器、BDD扫描和随机模拟的紧密集成;三个人都在用一个共享的图形表示电路。BDD扫描和SAT求解器以一种交织的方式应用,两者都受每次迭代期间不断增加的资源限制的控制。在这种协作设置中,BDD扫描逐渐减少SAT求解器的搜索空间,直到问题被解决或资源限制耗尽。该方法在几个方面改进了以前的工作:SAT求解器的集成应用显着提高了BDD扫描的能力和效率,并扩展了其对错误比较设计的适用性。此外,随机仿真算法在压缩电路图上工作,从而提高了运行效率。我们的实验表明,通过自动适应问题的难度,概述的方法对大量等价性检查实例是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信