Sustainability Disclosure in the EU Financial Sector

D. Busch
{"title":"Sustainability Disclosure in the EU Financial Sector","authors":"D. Busch","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3650407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the chapter is twofold. On the one hand, it explores the main features of the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation. On the other hand, it tries to assess whether the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation is likely to succeed in harmonising sustainability-related (i) disclosure rules and (ii) fiduciary duties, not only across Member States, but also across financial products and distribution channels. The author concludes that before we reach a sufficient degree of harmonisation of sustainability-related disclosure rules and fiduciary duties, there is still a long way to go. And even if we reach the required degree of harmonisation in the EU, it is not given that this will necessarily lead to a more sustainable world. As may be gleaned from the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance Action Plan, the EU is aiming high when it comes to sustainability. But the EU is not an island. The author argues that there are roughly two opposite scenarios. In a pessimistic scenario, the more lenient or even non-existent sustainability agenda of other geopolitical powers gives them a competitive edge that is detrimental to the EU. In a positive scenario, the EU becomes a global standard-setter in the area of sustainability. Large global institutional investors such as Blackrock and State Street in any event say they are strong supporters of the sustainability agenda. Also, the re-entry of the United States of America in the Paris Climate Agreement under the Biden Administration may give us some hope.","PeriodicalId":383457,"journal":{"name":"European Banking Institute (EBI) Research Paper Series","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Banking Institute (EBI) Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3650407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The aim of the chapter is twofold. On the one hand, it explores the main features of the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation. On the other hand, it tries to assess whether the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation is likely to succeed in harmonising sustainability-related (i) disclosure rules and (ii) fiduciary duties, not only across Member States, but also across financial products and distribution channels. The author concludes that before we reach a sufficient degree of harmonisation of sustainability-related disclosure rules and fiduciary duties, there is still a long way to go. And even if we reach the required degree of harmonisation in the EU, it is not given that this will necessarily lead to a more sustainable world. As may be gleaned from the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance Action Plan, the EU is aiming high when it comes to sustainability. But the EU is not an island. The author argues that there are roughly two opposite scenarios. In a pessimistic scenario, the more lenient or even non-existent sustainability agenda of other geopolitical powers gives them a competitive edge that is detrimental to the EU. In a positive scenario, the EU becomes a global standard-setter in the area of sustainability. Large global institutional investors such as Blackrock and State Street in any event say they are strong supporters of the sustainability agenda. Also, the re-entry of the United States of America in the Paris Climate Agreement under the Biden Administration may give us some hope.
欧盟金融部门的可持续性信息披露
本章的目的是双重的。一方面,探讨了可持续财务披露法规的主要特征。另一方面,它试图评估可持续金融披露法规是否有可能成功地协调与可持续性相关的(i)披露规则和(ii)受托责任,不仅在成员国之间,而且在金融产品和分销渠道之间。作者的结论是,在可持续发展相关的披露规则和受托责任达到足够程度的协调之前,我们还有很长的路要走。而且,即使我们在欧盟达到了所需的协调程度,也没有人认为这一定会带来一个更可持续的世界。从《欧洲绿色协议》和《可持续金融行动计划》中可以看出,欧盟在可持续性方面的目标很高。但欧盟并不是一座孤岛。作者认为大致有两种相反的情况。在悲观的情况下,其他地缘政治大国较为宽松、甚至根本不存在的可持续发展议程,给它们带来了不利于欧盟的竞争优势。在积极的情况下,欧盟将成为可持续发展领域的全球标准制定者。无论如何,贝莱德(Blackrock)和道富(State Street)等大型全球机构投资者都表示,它们是可持续发展议程的坚定支持者。此外,在拜登政府的领导下,美利坚合众国重新加入了《巴黎气候协定》,这可能会给我们带来一些希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信