Was the Great Depression the Fault of Government and Unions? An Institutional/Keynesian Analysis

Bruce E. Kaufman
{"title":"Was the Great Depression the Fault of Government and Unions? An Institutional/Keynesian Analysis","authors":"Bruce E. Kaufman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1889337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A growing number of economists blame the length and severity of the Great Depression on factors that rigidified wage rates, raised production costs, and interfered with flexible allocation of labor. The centerpiece of this critique is President Roosevelt‘s New Deal labor program, portrayed as creating a series of large negative supply shocks through encouragement of unions, minimum wages, unemployment insurance, and other anti-competitive industrial relations practices. This paper presents the other side of the story using a combination of institutional and Keynesian theory, drawn principally from the work of J.R. Commons and J.M. Keynes. Both - spending and - industrial relations' rationales for stable wages are developed; also developed is the positive economic case for the New Deal labor program. Attention is called to the long-neglected macroeconomic dimension of industrial relations.","PeriodicalId":129015,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Marxian; Sraffian; Institutional; Evolutionary (Topic)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Marxian; Sraffian; Institutional; Evolutionary (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1889337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A growing number of economists blame the length and severity of the Great Depression on factors that rigidified wage rates, raised production costs, and interfered with flexible allocation of labor. The centerpiece of this critique is President Roosevelt‘s New Deal labor program, portrayed as creating a series of large negative supply shocks through encouragement of unions, minimum wages, unemployment insurance, and other anti-competitive industrial relations practices. This paper presents the other side of the story using a combination of institutional and Keynesian theory, drawn principally from the work of J.R. Commons and J.M. Keynes. Both - spending and - industrial relations' rationales for stable wages are developed; also developed is the positive economic case for the New Deal labor program. Attention is called to the long-neglected macroeconomic dimension of industrial relations.
大萧条是政府和工会的错吗?制度/凯恩斯主义分析
越来越多的经济学家将大萧条的持续时间和严重程度归咎于固定工资率、提高生产成本和干扰劳动力灵活分配的因素。这种批评的核心是罗斯福总统的新政劳工计划,该计划被描述为通过鼓励工会、最低工资、失业保险和其他反竞争的劳资关系做法,造成了一系列大规模的负面供应冲击。本文主要从J.R. Commons和J.M. Keynes的著作中,结合了制度理论和凯恩斯理论,呈现了故事的另一面。他们提出了支出和劳资关系维持稳定工资的基本原理;新政劳工计划也有积极的经济意义。需要注意长期被忽视的工业关系的宏观经济方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信