Evaluation of Contact Lens Data Acquisition Approaches using Enhancement Techniques

Nur Alifah Megat Abd Mana, Lim Chee Chin, H. Yazid, C. Y. Fook
{"title":"Evaluation of Contact Lens Data Acquisition Approaches using Enhancement Techniques","authors":"Nur Alifah Megat Abd Mana, Lim Chee Chin, H. Yazid, C. Y. Fook","doi":"10.1109/AIST55798.2022.10065211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contact lenses can be helpful to improve the quality of human life. The inspection process plays a big role to produce good quality contact lens products. However, there is a challenge to detecting the defects in contact lenses during the production line. The transparent type of silicone hydrogel contact lens is one of the most difficult to detect the defects inside it. The primary purpose of this paper is to examine the differences in quality images between four different data acquisition approaches based on two image enhancement techniques, Gaussian blurring and Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE). Acquiring a clear and good-quality image, required a specific experimental setup which consists of a high-resolution camera lens and also the right position of the camera stand and camera angle. Based on performance metrics for both enhancement techniques, Approach 2 showed better performance compared to other approaches when the result from Gaussian blurring showed the highest value of PSNR (29.02321), lowest values of MSE (81.42533), and lowest value AMBE (-0.55510). While for the CLAHE method, the result showed the highest value of PSNR (28.50377), the lowest value of MSE (91.77044), and the lowest value of AMBE (-0.05532). This proves that approach 2 provides a better quality image due to less noise.","PeriodicalId":360351,"journal":{"name":"2022 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Speech Technology (AIST)","volume":"431 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Speech Technology (AIST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AIST55798.2022.10065211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contact lenses can be helpful to improve the quality of human life. The inspection process plays a big role to produce good quality contact lens products. However, there is a challenge to detecting the defects in contact lenses during the production line. The transparent type of silicone hydrogel contact lens is one of the most difficult to detect the defects inside it. The primary purpose of this paper is to examine the differences in quality images between four different data acquisition approaches based on two image enhancement techniques, Gaussian blurring and Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE). Acquiring a clear and good-quality image, required a specific experimental setup which consists of a high-resolution camera lens and also the right position of the camera stand and camera angle. Based on performance metrics for both enhancement techniques, Approach 2 showed better performance compared to other approaches when the result from Gaussian blurring showed the highest value of PSNR (29.02321), lowest values of MSE (81.42533), and lowest value AMBE (-0.55510). While for the CLAHE method, the result showed the highest value of PSNR (28.50377), the lowest value of MSE (91.77044), and the lowest value of AMBE (-0.05532). This proves that approach 2 provides a better quality image due to less noise.
使用增强技术评估隐形眼镜数据采集方法
隐形眼镜有助于提高人类的生活质量。检验过程对生产高质量的隐形眼镜产品起着很大的作用。然而,在隐形眼镜的生产过程中,缺陷的检测是一个挑战。透明型硅水凝胶隐形眼镜是其内部缺陷检测难度最大的一种。本文的主要目的是研究基于高斯模糊和对比度有限自适应直方图均衡化(CLAHE)两种图像增强技术的四种不同数据采集方法之间图像质量的差异。为了获得清晰、高质量的图像,需要一个特定的实验装置,包括一个高分辨率的相机镜头,以及正确的相机支架位置和相机角度。基于两种增强技术的性能指标,当高斯模糊结果显示最高的PSNR(29.02321),最低的MSE(81.42533)和最低的AMBE(-0.55510)时,方法2比其他方法表现出更好的性能。clhe方法的PSNR最高(28.50377),MSE最低(91.77044),AMBE最低(-0.05532)。这证明了方法2由于噪声较少而提供了更好的图像质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信