Smelling Molecular Structure

Benjamin D. Young
{"title":"Smelling Molecular Structure","authors":"Benjamin D. Young","doi":"10.4324/9780429462658-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Smells are mysterious entities.1 They seemingly arise inside our nose, providing a private phenomenological experience, yet at the same time we acknowledge that smells are external entities carried upon the wind. We talk about smells as objective entities of shared attention but are not sure of their ontological status. While the chemoreceptive sciences are still researching the mechanisms of sensory transduction in olfaction, minimally there is consensus that we perceive chemical compounds. The exact property of these compounds is still under investigation, as well as how these yield our sensory experience of what things smell like. Nonetheless few would disagree with the statement that using olfaction we perceive chemical compounds composing gaseous clouds—that is, few except philosophers. In the last decade, there has been a rapid development of philosophical theories regarding the nature of smell.2 This chapter assesses the current philosophical debate about smells. The theories to be covered are: Naïve Realism, Odor Theories, Stuff Theories, Non-Objectivist Theories, Process Theory and Molecular Structure Theory.3 The theories will be evaluated based on their explanations of (a) the olfactory quality of a smell, (b) smells as distal entities and (c) our experience of smells as intentional objects,4 which are arguably the three central issues in answering what are smells.5 The chapter concludes with a defense of Molecular Structure Theory that demonstrates its strengths in accounting for each of these three aspects of smell.","PeriodicalId":152495,"journal":{"name":"Perception, Cognition and Aesthetics","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perception, Cognition and Aesthetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429462658-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Smells are mysterious entities.1 They seemingly arise inside our nose, providing a private phenomenological experience, yet at the same time we acknowledge that smells are external entities carried upon the wind. We talk about smells as objective entities of shared attention but are not sure of their ontological status. While the chemoreceptive sciences are still researching the mechanisms of sensory transduction in olfaction, minimally there is consensus that we perceive chemical compounds. The exact property of these compounds is still under investigation, as well as how these yield our sensory experience of what things smell like. Nonetheless few would disagree with the statement that using olfaction we perceive chemical compounds composing gaseous clouds—that is, few except philosophers. In the last decade, there has been a rapid development of philosophical theories regarding the nature of smell.2 This chapter assesses the current philosophical debate about smells. The theories to be covered are: Naïve Realism, Odor Theories, Stuff Theories, Non-Objectivist Theories, Process Theory and Molecular Structure Theory.3 The theories will be evaluated based on their explanations of (a) the olfactory quality of a smell, (b) smells as distal entities and (c) our experience of smells as intentional objects,4 which are arguably the three central issues in answering what are smells.5 The chapter concludes with a defense of Molecular Structure Theory that demonstrates its strengths in accounting for each of these three aspects of smell.
嗅觉分子结构
气味是一种神秘的存在它们似乎出现在我们的鼻子里,提供了一种私人的现象学体验,但同时我们也承认气味是随风传播的外部实体。我们谈论气味作为共同注意的客观实体,但不确定它们的本体论地位。虽然化学感受科学仍在研究嗅觉中的感觉转导机制,但至少有共识认为我们感知化合物。这些化合物的确切性质仍在研究中,以及它们如何产生我们对事物气味的感官体验。尽管如此,除了哲学家之外,很少有人会不同意这样的说法:我们利用嗅觉来感知构成气云的化合物。在过去的十年里,关于气味本质的哲学理论有了迅速的发展本章评估了当前关于气味的哲学辩论。所涵盖的理论是:Naïve现实主义,气味理论,物质理论,非客观主义理论,过程理论和分子结构理论。3这些理论将根据它们对(a)气味的嗅觉质量,(b)气味作为远端实体和(c)我们作为有意对象的气味经验的解释进行评估,4这可以说是回答什么是气味的三个核心问题本章以分子结构理论的辩护结束,该理论证明了它在解释气味的这三个方面中的每一个方面的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信