Novel Multiplexed Plasma Biomarkers and Clinical Factors Augment Risk Assessment for Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules in Former Smokers

A. Fish, A. Vachani, P. Massion, S. Antic, N. Trivedi, J. K. Brown, T. Rubenstein, A. D. Rostykus, M. Beggs, Hongfeng Yu, L. Carbonell, M. Arjomandi
{"title":"Novel Multiplexed Plasma Biomarkers and Clinical Factors Augment Risk Assessment for Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules in Former Smokers","authors":"A. Fish, A. Vachani, P. Massion, S. Antic, N. Trivedi, J. K. Brown, T. Rubenstein, A. D. Rostykus, M. Beggs, Hongfeng Yu, L. Carbonell, M. Arjomandi","doi":"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2019.199.1_meetingabstracts.a7452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"METHODS: Plasma protein assays for the MagArray immunoassay platform were developed for biomarkers likely to provide discrimination between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules found on CT scan in former smokers. Retrospective plasma samples from a cohort of 217 subjects at high risk of lung cancer, collected at three medical centers across the US, were randomly assigned to a training set (n=73) and a testing set (n=144) for generalized linear modeling. The minimum set of protein biomarkers and clinical factors that provided the highest accuracy in classifying benign and malignant subjects were identified. Model performance was further evaluated by its ability to assign the correct risk classification for subjects with an intermediate risk nodule based on the Mayo Pre-Test Probability of Malignancy Model. RESULTS: A biomarker and clinical factor model consisting of TIMP1, ProSB, EGFR, CEA, and NAP2 protein biomarker levels, along with subject age, sex, nodule size, and nodule spiculated appearance provided an accuracy of 73% in the 144 testing subjects with a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 82%. The ROC curve AUC was 0.86 compared to the Mayo model AUC of 0.79 (Figure 1A). Within the 93 test subjects falling into the Mayo model intermediate risk range (0.05 to 0.65), the algorithm showed a ROC curve AUC of 0.82 compared to the Mayo model AUC of 0.64 (Figure 1B). Of those 93 subjects falling within the intermediate risk range, the algorithm correctly classified 70 of 93 samples (75%) as either benign or malignant.","PeriodicalId":158441,"journal":{"name":"C110. THE FUTURE OF LUNG CANCER BIOMARKERS: WHERE SHOULD WE LOOK?","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"C110. THE FUTURE OF LUNG CANCER BIOMARKERS: WHERE SHOULD WE LOOK?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2019.199.1_meetingabstracts.a7452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

METHODS: Plasma protein assays for the MagArray immunoassay platform were developed for biomarkers likely to provide discrimination between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules found on CT scan in former smokers. Retrospective plasma samples from a cohort of 217 subjects at high risk of lung cancer, collected at three medical centers across the US, were randomly assigned to a training set (n=73) and a testing set (n=144) for generalized linear modeling. The minimum set of protein biomarkers and clinical factors that provided the highest accuracy in classifying benign and malignant subjects were identified. Model performance was further evaluated by its ability to assign the correct risk classification for subjects with an intermediate risk nodule based on the Mayo Pre-Test Probability of Malignancy Model. RESULTS: A biomarker and clinical factor model consisting of TIMP1, ProSB, EGFR, CEA, and NAP2 protein biomarker levels, along with subject age, sex, nodule size, and nodule spiculated appearance provided an accuracy of 73% in the 144 testing subjects with a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 82%. The ROC curve AUC was 0.86 compared to the Mayo model AUC of 0.79 (Figure 1A). Within the 93 test subjects falling into the Mayo model intermediate risk range (0.05 to 0.65), the algorithm showed a ROC curve AUC of 0.82 compared to the Mayo model AUC of 0.64 (Figure 1B). Of those 93 subjects falling within the intermediate risk range, the algorithm correctly classified 70 of 93 samples (75%) as either benign or malignant.
新的多路血浆生物标志物和临床因素增加了前吸烟者不确定肺结节的风险评估
方法:开发了用于MagArray免疫分析平台的血浆蛋白检测方法,用于区分前吸烟者CT扫描中发现的良性和恶性肺结节的生物标志物。从美国三家医疗中心收集的217名肺癌高危人群的回顾性血浆样本被随机分配到一个训练集(n=73)和一个测试集(n=144),用于广义线性建模。确定了在分类良性和恶性受试者时提供最高准确性的最小蛋白质生物标志物和临床因素集。通过对基于Mayo预测试恶性肿瘤概率模型的具有中间风险结节的受试者分配正确风险分类的能力,进一步评估了模型的性能。结果:由TIMP1、ProSB、EGFR、CEA和NAP2蛋白生物标志物水平以及受试者年龄、性别、结节大小和结节多刺外观组成的生物标志物和临床因素模型在144名受试者中准确性为73%,敏感性为76%,特异性为82%。ROC曲线AUC为0.86,Mayo模型AUC为0.79(图1A)。在属于Mayo模型中间风险范围(0.05 ~ 0.65)的93名受试者中,算法的ROC曲线AUC为0.82,而Mayo模型的AUC为0.64(图1B)。在这93个处于中间风险范围的受试者中,该算法正确地将93个样本中的70个(75%)分类为良性或恶性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信