A. Fish, A. Vachani, P. Massion, S. Antic, N. Trivedi, J. K. Brown, T. Rubenstein, A. D. Rostykus, M. Beggs, Hongfeng Yu, L. Carbonell, M. Arjomandi
{"title":"Novel Multiplexed Plasma Biomarkers and Clinical Factors Augment Risk Assessment for Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules in Former Smokers","authors":"A. Fish, A. Vachani, P. Massion, S. Antic, N. Trivedi, J. K. Brown, T. Rubenstein, A. D. Rostykus, M. Beggs, Hongfeng Yu, L. Carbonell, M. Arjomandi","doi":"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2019.199.1_meetingabstracts.a7452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"METHODS: Plasma protein assays for the MagArray immunoassay platform were developed for biomarkers likely to provide discrimination between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules found on CT scan in former smokers. Retrospective plasma samples from a cohort of 217 subjects at high risk of lung cancer, collected at three medical centers across the US, were randomly assigned to a training set (n=73) and a testing set (n=144) for generalized linear modeling. The minimum set of protein biomarkers and clinical factors that provided the highest accuracy in classifying benign and malignant subjects were identified. Model performance was further evaluated by its ability to assign the correct risk classification for subjects with an intermediate risk nodule based on the Mayo Pre-Test Probability of Malignancy Model. RESULTS: A biomarker and clinical factor model consisting of TIMP1, ProSB, EGFR, CEA, and NAP2 protein biomarker levels, along with subject age, sex, nodule size, and nodule spiculated appearance provided an accuracy of 73% in the 144 testing subjects with a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 82%. The ROC curve AUC was 0.86 compared to the Mayo model AUC of 0.79 (Figure 1A). Within the 93 test subjects falling into the Mayo model intermediate risk range (0.05 to 0.65), the algorithm showed a ROC curve AUC of 0.82 compared to the Mayo model AUC of 0.64 (Figure 1B). Of those 93 subjects falling within the intermediate risk range, the algorithm correctly classified 70 of 93 samples (75%) as either benign or malignant.","PeriodicalId":158441,"journal":{"name":"C110. THE FUTURE OF LUNG CANCER BIOMARKERS: WHERE SHOULD WE LOOK?","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"C110. THE FUTURE OF LUNG CANCER BIOMARKERS: WHERE SHOULD WE LOOK?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2019.199.1_meetingabstracts.a7452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
METHODS: Plasma protein assays for the MagArray immunoassay platform were developed for biomarkers likely to provide discrimination between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules found on CT scan in former smokers. Retrospective plasma samples from a cohort of 217 subjects at high risk of lung cancer, collected at three medical centers across the US, were randomly assigned to a training set (n=73) and a testing set (n=144) for generalized linear modeling. The minimum set of protein biomarkers and clinical factors that provided the highest accuracy in classifying benign and malignant subjects were identified. Model performance was further evaluated by its ability to assign the correct risk classification for subjects with an intermediate risk nodule based on the Mayo Pre-Test Probability of Malignancy Model. RESULTS: A biomarker and clinical factor model consisting of TIMP1, ProSB, EGFR, CEA, and NAP2 protein biomarker levels, along with subject age, sex, nodule size, and nodule spiculated appearance provided an accuracy of 73% in the 144 testing subjects with a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 82%. The ROC curve AUC was 0.86 compared to the Mayo model AUC of 0.79 (Figure 1A). Within the 93 test subjects falling into the Mayo model intermediate risk range (0.05 to 0.65), the algorithm showed a ROC curve AUC of 0.82 compared to the Mayo model AUC of 0.64 (Figure 1B). Of those 93 subjects falling within the intermediate risk range, the algorithm correctly classified 70 of 93 samples (75%) as either benign or malignant.