{"title":"Development of Yogurt Analogue by Blending Soy-Maize Milk","authors":"Prem Kumar Limbu, Dambar Bahadur Khadka, Bunty Maskey","doi":"10.3126/tujfst.v1i1.49938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research was to develop yogurt analogue by blending soy-maize milk and to study its sensory and keeping quality. D-optimal mixture design was employed for the formulation of soy-maize yogurt analogue. Five different formulations containing soymilk and maize milk in the ratio of 100:0, 85:15, 70:30, 55:45 and 40:60 were prepared. Sugar (6 g per 100 g milk base), xanthan gum (0.005 g per 100 g milk base) and culture (2U per 20 l) were mixed in all formulations. The prepared yogurts were subjected to sensory evaluation for consumer acceptability. The sensory analysis revealed that soymilk (85%) and maize milk (15%) was of acceptable quality. There was significant difference (p<0.05) between the formulation in terms of color and appearance, flavor, body and texture and overall acceptance. The soy and soy-maize yogurt (optimized) were evaluated for fermentation kinetics (pH, acidity, total plate count and Streptococcus thermophilus count) at the interval of 2 h for 6 h during incubation; and during storage (refrigeration temperature 4-5℃) at the interval of 3 days for 12 days. The physicochemical analysis showed that there was significant difference (p<0.05) in terms of protein, carbohydrate, acidity and syneresis and not significant (p>0.05) in regards of moisture content, fat, ash, and pH between soy and soy-maize yogurt. Also, there was significant difference (p<0.05) in pH, acidity, total plate count and Streptococcus thermophilus count with respect to incubation and storage time for soy and soy-maize yogurt. The yeast and molds count were observed at the 12th day of storage only. The syneresis of soy and soy-maize yogurt was also significantly different (p<0.05) with respect to storage time.","PeriodicalId":193108,"journal":{"name":"Tribhuvan University Journal of Food Science and Technology","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tribhuvan University Journal of Food Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/tujfst.v1i1.49938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The aim of this research was to develop yogurt analogue by blending soy-maize milk and to study its sensory and keeping quality. D-optimal mixture design was employed for the formulation of soy-maize yogurt analogue. Five different formulations containing soymilk and maize milk in the ratio of 100:0, 85:15, 70:30, 55:45 and 40:60 were prepared. Sugar (6 g per 100 g milk base), xanthan gum (0.005 g per 100 g milk base) and culture (2U per 20 l) were mixed in all formulations. The prepared yogurts were subjected to sensory evaluation for consumer acceptability. The sensory analysis revealed that soymilk (85%) and maize milk (15%) was of acceptable quality. There was significant difference (p<0.05) between the formulation in terms of color and appearance, flavor, body and texture and overall acceptance. The soy and soy-maize yogurt (optimized) were evaluated for fermentation kinetics (pH, acidity, total plate count and Streptococcus thermophilus count) at the interval of 2 h for 6 h during incubation; and during storage (refrigeration temperature 4-5℃) at the interval of 3 days for 12 days. The physicochemical analysis showed that there was significant difference (p<0.05) in terms of protein, carbohydrate, acidity and syneresis and not significant (p>0.05) in regards of moisture content, fat, ash, and pH between soy and soy-maize yogurt. Also, there was significant difference (p<0.05) in pH, acidity, total plate count and Streptococcus thermophilus count with respect to incubation and storage time for soy and soy-maize yogurt. The yeast and molds count were observed at the 12th day of storage only. The syneresis of soy and soy-maize yogurt was also significantly different (p<0.05) with respect to storage time.
本研究的目的是将豆浆和玉米浆混合制成类似酸奶,并对其感官和保鲜性能进行研究。采用d -最优混合设计配制大豆-玉米酸奶类似物。分别以100:0、85:15、70:30、55:45和40:60的比例配制了5种不同的豆浆和玉米浆配方。在所有配方中混合糖(每100克奶基6克)、黄原胶(每100克奶基0.005克)和培养物(每20 l 2U)。对所制备的酸奶进行感官评价,以确定消费者的可接受性。感官分析显示豆浆(85%)和玉米乳(15%)质量可接受。大豆酸奶与大豆-玉米酸奶在水分、脂肪、灰分和pH值方面存在显著差异(p0.05)。此外,大豆和大豆-玉米酸奶的pH、酸度、总平板数和嗜热链球菌数在培养和贮存时间方面也存在显著差异(p<0.05)。仅在贮藏第12天观察酵母和霉菌的计数。大豆酸奶和大豆-玉米酸奶的协同效应也随贮藏时间的延长而显著差异(p<0.05)。