The Atheist Bunyan: The Pilgrim’s Progress and Organized Freethought in Victorian Britain

David Reagles
{"title":"The Atheist Bunyan: The Pilgrim’s Progress and Organized Freethought in Victorian Britain","authors":"David Reagles","doi":"10.7202/1032706AR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores how freethinkers received John Bunyan and read his works in Victorian Britain. An analysis of freethinking periodicals, letters to editors, lectures, essays, and autobiography reveals a vexed relationship that was anything but monolithic. There emerged two distinct reading communities within organized freethought. Some freethinkers, especially in the early nineteenth century, rejected Bunyan as another representation of irrational religious faith that was a hindrance to societal reform. However, other freethinkers appropriated his works and used him as a valuable resource for understanding their own experiences with religion as well as for communicating their message. I demonstrate that these contrasting positions resulted from interpretive strategies that stem from fundamental assumptions regarding how the project of secularism ought to interact with Britain’s predominantly Christian culture. It corresponds to an ongoing negotiation of meaning within organized freethought that reflects internal fissures, as well as a rapidly changing British society.","PeriodicalId":130512,"journal":{"name":"Mémoires du livre / Studies in Book Culture","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mémoires du livre / Studies in Book Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1032706AR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores how freethinkers received John Bunyan and read his works in Victorian Britain. An analysis of freethinking periodicals, letters to editors, lectures, essays, and autobiography reveals a vexed relationship that was anything but monolithic. There emerged two distinct reading communities within organized freethought. Some freethinkers, especially in the early nineteenth century, rejected Bunyan as another representation of irrational religious faith that was a hindrance to societal reform. However, other freethinkers appropriated his works and used him as a valuable resource for understanding their own experiences with religion as well as for communicating their message. I demonstrate that these contrasting positions resulted from interpretive strategies that stem from fundamental assumptions regarding how the project of secularism ought to interact with Britain’s predominantly Christian culture. It corresponds to an ongoing negotiation of meaning within organized freethought that reflects internal fissures, as well as a rapidly changing British society.
无神论者班扬:维多利亚时代英国清教徒的进步和有组织的自由思想
本文探讨了在维多利亚时代的英国,自由思想者是如何接受约翰·班扬并阅读他的作品的。对自由思想期刊、给编辑的信、演讲、散文和自传的分析揭示了一种令人烦恼的关系,这种关系绝非铁板一块。在有组织的自由思想中出现了两个截然不同的阅读群体。一些自由思想家,特别是在19世纪早期,拒绝班扬,认为这是非理性宗教信仰的另一种代表,是社会改革的障碍。然而,其他自由思想家挪用了他的作品,并将他作为宝贵的资源来理解他们自己的宗教经历,以及交流他们的信息。我证明了这些截然不同的立场源于解释策略,这些解释策略源于关于世俗主义项目应该如何与英国占主导地位的基督教文化相互作用的基本假设。它对应的是在有组织的自由思想中进行的意义谈判,反映了内部的裂痕,以及快速变化的英国社会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信