An Analysis of Interstate Migration in Mexico: Impact of Origin and Destination States on Migration Patterns

Hiroshi Fukurai, J. Pick, E. Butler, S. Nag
{"title":"An Analysis of Interstate Migration in Mexico: Impact of Origin and Destination States on Migration Patterns","authors":"Hiroshi Fukurai, J. Pick, E. Butler, S. Nag","doi":"10.2307/1051813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines two theories of interstate migration in Mexico as explanations of interstate migration patterns: (1) a comparative economic opportunity thesis and (2) economic segmentation (or dual economy) model. The economic opportunity thesis argues that factors such as employment opportunities and salaries arc major considerations in any decision to move. Thus, internal migration is held to he an important way by which workers respond to changing economic opportunities and thereby redirect the spatial allocation of labor toward a more optimal pattern. The economic opportunity thesis, thus, assumes that rural-urban migration is primarily caused by higher paying jobs in urban sectors and shifts the analytical scope onto pull factors affecting rural exodus.The economic segmentation thesis, on the other hand, contains two components. First, micro-social factors (i.e., opportunities and salaries) do not determine the pattern of internal migration but, rather, a dual economy based on differential organizational development is the major determinant of migration patterns. By creating both labor market and economic opportunities, laborers are spatially allocated to meet the changing economic organizational structure. Second, the model also points out the importance of analyzing structural factors at both origin and destination of interstate migrants. While pull factor influence urban migration, structural factors in sending states also may affect urban exodus as well, i.e., organizational development, job availability, and the distribution of occupational reward structures. In general, the economic segmentation theory analyzes how the intrusion and penetration of modern capitalist social relations into the countryside triggers waves of rural migrants to receiving states in spite of the fact that there arc few opportunities (such as jobs and housing). The theoretical tenets of the economic opportunity and economic segmentation theses arc explored more fully in the next section.","PeriodicalId":166265,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Patterns of Emigration (Topic)","volume":"257 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Patterns of Emigration (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1051813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This paper examines two theories of interstate migration in Mexico as explanations of interstate migration patterns: (1) a comparative economic opportunity thesis and (2) economic segmentation (or dual economy) model. The economic opportunity thesis argues that factors such as employment opportunities and salaries arc major considerations in any decision to move. Thus, internal migration is held to he an important way by which workers respond to changing economic opportunities and thereby redirect the spatial allocation of labor toward a more optimal pattern. The economic opportunity thesis, thus, assumes that rural-urban migration is primarily caused by higher paying jobs in urban sectors and shifts the analytical scope onto pull factors affecting rural exodus.The economic segmentation thesis, on the other hand, contains two components. First, micro-social factors (i.e., opportunities and salaries) do not determine the pattern of internal migration but, rather, a dual economy based on differential organizational development is the major determinant of migration patterns. By creating both labor market and economic opportunities, laborers are spatially allocated to meet the changing economic organizational structure. Second, the model also points out the importance of analyzing structural factors at both origin and destination of interstate migrants. While pull factor influence urban migration, structural factors in sending states also may affect urban exodus as well, i.e., organizational development, job availability, and the distribution of occupational reward structures. In general, the economic segmentation theory analyzes how the intrusion and penetration of modern capitalist social relations into the countryside triggers waves of rural migrants to receiving states in spite of the fact that there arc few opportunities (such as jobs and housing). The theoretical tenets of the economic opportunity and economic segmentation theses arc explored more fully in the next section.
墨西哥州际移民分析:来源国和目的地国对移民模式的影响
本文考察了两种解释墨西哥州际移民模式的理论:(1)比较经济机会理论和(2)经济分割(或双重经济)模型。经济机会理论认为,就业机会和工资等因素是任何移民决定的主要考虑因素。因此,内部迁移被认为是工人应对不断变化的经济机会的重要方式,从而将劳动力的空间配置转向更优化的模式。因此,经济机会理论假设城乡人口迁移主要是由城市部门的高薪工作引起的,并将分析范围转移到影响农村人口外流的拉动因素上。另一方面,经济分割理论包含两个部分。第一,微观社会因素(即机会和薪金)并不能决定国内移徙的模式,相反,以不同组织发展为基础的双重经济是移徙模式的主要决定因素。通过创造劳动力市场和经济机会,劳动力在空间上得到配置,以适应不断变化的经济组织结构。其次,该模型还指出了分析州际移民来源国和目的地国结构性因素的重要性。在拉动因素影响城市移民的同时,派遣国的结构性因素也可能影响城市移民,即组织发展、工作可得性和职业奖励结构的分布。总的来说,经济分割理论分析的是现代资本主义社会关系对农村的侵入和渗透是如何引发农村移民潮的,尽管他们几乎没有机会(如工作和住房)。下一节将对经济机会和经济分割论文的理论原理进行更全面的探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信