D. Stearns, D. Gaines, B. Lafontaine, G. Sommargren, D. Sweeney, D. Kania, N. Ceglio
{"title":"Nonspecular Scattering in EUV Lithography: Determining Specifications for Surface Finish","authors":"D. Stearns, D. Gaines, B. Lafontaine, G. Sommargren, D. Sweeney, D. Kania, N. Ceglio","doi":"10.1364/eul.1996.rmc167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As EUV lithography progresses from laboratory research to prototype\n development the realistic performance of manufacturable components\n becomes a primary concern. Nowhere is this more evident than in the\n fabrication and implementation of the EUV imaging optics. It is now\n well understood that the structure of the optical surfaces and the\n multilayer coatings (ML) that make the surfaces reflective at soft\n x-ray wavelengths must be specified and fabricated with unprecedented\n accuracy. Errors in the structure, which include deviations in the\n surface profile of the substrate and unintentional variations in the\n multilayer period, cause aberations in the imaging process. When these\n errors are at very long spatial wavelengths they are treated\n deterministically, and can be evaluated (and hence corrected) using\n interferometric methods now under development. However, there are\n errors in the surface profile at all spatial frequencies. Describing\n the exact structure of the surfaces of the optics at all spatial\n scalelengths is an intractable problem. Instead the surface figure\n errors at mid- and high-spatial frequency (called “roughness” or\n “finish”) are treated statistically. Within this statistical\n description, the effect of surface (and multilayer) roughness is to\n remove intensity from the image (the specular field) and scatter it\n throughout the image field. This nonspecular scattering is problematic\n for two reasons: (1) it decreases the useful throughput of the optical\n system and, (2) it produces a backround halo which reduces the\n contrast of the image. In this paper we describe a method of relating\n the nonspecular scattering to the roughness of the optical surfaces in\n a distributed EUVL imaging system. Our ultimate goal is to develop a\n robust specification of surface finish that can be used as the\n guideline for manufacturing EUV optics.","PeriodicalId":201185,"journal":{"name":"Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography (TOPS)","volume":"501 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography (TOPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1364/eul.1996.rmc167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
As EUV lithography progresses from laboratory research to prototype
development the realistic performance of manufacturable components
becomes a primary concern. Nowhere is this more evident than in the
fabrication and implementation of the EUV imaging optics. It is now
well understood that the structure of the optical surfaces and the
multilayer coatings (ML) that make the surfaces reflective at soft
x-ray wavelengths must be specified and fabricated with unprecedented
accuracy. Errors in the structure, which include deviations in the
surface profile of the substrate and unintentional variations in the
multilayer period, cause aberations in the imaging process. When these
errors are at very long spatial wavelengths they are treated
deterministically, and can be evaluated (and hence corrected) using
interferometric methods now under development. However, there are
errors in the surface profile at all spatial frequencies. Describing
the exact structure of the surfaces of the optics at all spatial
scalelengths is an intractable problem. Instead the surface figure
errors at mid- and high-spatial frequency (called “roughness” or
“finish”) are treated statistically. Within this statistical
description, the effect of surface (and multilayer) roughness is to
remove intensity from the image (the specular field) and scatter it
throughout the image field. This nonspecular scattering is problematic
for two reasons: (1) it decreases the useful throughput of the optical
system and, (2) it produces a backround halo which reduces the
contrast of the image. In this paper we describe a method of relating
the nonspecular scattering to the roughness of the optical surfaces in
a distributed EUVL imaging system. Our ultimate goal is to develop a
robust specification of surface finish that can be used as the
guideline for manufacturing EUV optics.