Government Expenditures and Economic Growth: a Nonlinear Causality Investigation for the UK

S. Karagianni, M. Pempetzoglou, A. Saraidaris
{"title":"Government Expenditures and Economic Growth: a Nonlinear Causality Investigation for the UK","authors":"S. Karagianni, M. Pempetzoglou, A. Saraidaris","doi":"10.26417/EJME-2019.V2I2-70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to explore the causal relationship between government expenditures and economic growth in the UK. The analysis emphasizes on the nonlinearity facet of the explored causality. In this aspect, existing conditional heteroscedasticity as a potential source of bias, is filtered out with the use of the nonparametric Diks and Panchenko causality test. The UK government expenditures are disaggregated into total managed expenditure (TGE), current expenditure (CGE) and net investment (IGE), in order to account for a possible heterogeneity in a causality disclosure linked to the nature of expenditures. The findings support that UK government spending Granger causes nonlinearly UK economic growth. Overall, government spending at all three levels of disaggregation is documented to influence the economic growth in the UK. In this aspect, the results move along with the endogenous growth literature. However, in a policy making framework, the disclosed nonlinearity patterns stress the high risk involved whenever economic growth is pursued restrictively via public spending policies overlooking other important elements of the economic life (e.g. market structure, macroeconomic environment, etc.). Additionally, the exhibited nonlinearity in the examined causality could be regarded as a likely cause of the widespread diversification of the findings in the field empirical literature.","PeriodicalId":409185,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Marketing and Economics","volume":"221 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Marketing and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26417/EJME-2019.V2I2-70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This study aims to explore the causal relationship between government expenditures and economic growth in the UK. The analysis emphasizes on the nonlinearity facet of the explored causality. In this aspect, existing conditional heteroscedasticity as a potential source of bias, is filtered out with the use of the nonparametric Diks and Panchenko causality test. The UK government expenditures are disaggregated into total managed expenditure (TGE), current expenditure (CGE) and net investment (IGE), in order to account for a possible heterogeneity in a causality disclosure linked to the nature of expenditures. The findings support that UK government spending Granger causes nonlinearly UK economic growth. Overall, government spending at all three levels of disaggregation is documented to influence the economic growth in the UK. In this aspect, the results move along with the endogenous growth literature. However, in a policy making framework, the disclosed nonlinearity patterns stress the high risk involved whenever economic growth is pursued restrictively via public spending policies overlooking other important elements of the economic life (e.g. market structure, macroeconomic environment, etc.). Additionally, the exhibited nonlinearity in the examined causality could be regarded as a likely cause of the widespread diversification of the findings in the field empirical literature.
政府支出与经济增长:英国的非线性因果关系研究
本研究旨在探讨英国政府支出与经济增长之间的因果关系。分析强调了所探索的因果关系的非线性方面。在这方面,使用非参数Diks和Panchenko因果检验过滤掉了作为潜在偏倚来源的条件异方差。英国政府支出被分为总管理支出(TGE)、经常支出(CGE)和净投资(IGE),以解释与支出性质相关的因果关系披露中可能存在的异质性。研究结果支持了英国政府支出格兰杰对英国经济增长的非线性影响。总体而言,所有三个分类水平的政府支出都记录在案,以影响英国的经济增长。在这方面,结果与内生生长文献一致。然而,在政策制定框架中,所披露的非线性模式强调了当通过公共支出政策限制地追求经济增长时所涉及的高风险,而忽视了经济生活的其他重要因素(例如市场结构、宏观经济环境等)。此外,在所研究的因果关系中所表现出的非线性可以被视为该领域实证文献中发现广泛多样化的可能原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信