CREENCIAS Y PENSAMIENTOS DISTORSIONADOS HACIA LA VIOLENCIA EN HOMBRES Y MUJERES: AGRESIVIDAD, AUTOESTIMA Y CONTROL DEL SESGO DE RESPUESTA /[BELIEFS AND DISTORTED THINKING ABOUT VIOLENCE IN MEN AND WOMEN: AGGRESSIVENESS, SELF-ESTEEM EVALUATION OF RESPONSE BIAS]

Enrique Armas-Vargas
{"title":"CREENCIAS Y PENSAMIENTOS DISTORSIONADOS HACIA LA VIOLENCIA EN HOMBRES Y MUJERES: AGRESIVIDAD, AUTOESTIMA Y CONTROL DEL SESGO DE RESPUESTA /[BELIEFS AND DISTORTED THINKING ABOUT VIOLENCE IN MEN AND WOMEN: AGGRESSIVENESS, SELF-ESTEEM EVALUATION OF RESPONSE BIAS]","authors":"Enrique Armas-Vargas","doi":"10.2478/9788395609596-010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Irrational thoughts and distorted beliefs with respect to gender roles and the use of violence against a partner is not exclusive to aggressors, but can also form part of society as a whole. It is common to find cognitive biases and irrational beliefs among males referring specifically to the inferiority of women and gender roles. Similarly, males tend to justify and minimize violence and to blame women for the abuse. In this work, we relate sexist beliefs and distorted thoughts to aggressive behaviour and self-esteem. We make use of the factorial structure of the Distorted Beliefs and Thoughts Against Women in the Couple Questionnaire (CREE) whose reliability is α .92. The sample of volunteers was 223 adults from the Canary Islands, 102 men and 121 women ( M age = 35.25; SD = 10.46). To measure the effects of possible response distortion given in the tests, we have validated them using the scales of Social Desirability and Sincerity of the ATRAMIC test. Males scored higher than females for the factors “Gender Roles” and “Justification and Minimization of Abuse/Violence”. No significant differences were found between genders for either “Couple Relationship/Dominant Emotional Dependence” or “Exoneration for Abuse/Violence”. The variables studied that best predicted “Couple Relationship/Dominant Emotional Dependency” were Exoneration for Abuse /Violence, Hostility, Justification, and Minimization of Violence, Gender Roles, and Social Desirability.","PeriodicalId":422136,"journal":{"name":"Colección Psicología y Ley","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colección Psicología y Ley","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/9788395609596-010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Irrational thoughts and distorted beliefs with respect to gender roles and the use of violence against a partner is not exclusive to aggressors, but can also form part of society as a whole. It is common to find cognitive biases and irrational beliefs among males referring specifically to the inferiority of women and gender roles. Similarly, males tend to justify and minimize violence and to blame women for the abuse. In this work, we relate sexist beliefs and distorted thoughts to aggressive behaviour and self-esteem. We make use of the factorial structure of the Distorted Beliefs and Thoughts Against Women in the Couple Questionnaire (CREE) whose reliability is α .92. The sample of volunteers was 223 adults from the Canary Islands, 102 men and 121 women ( M age = 35.25; SD = 10.46). To measure the effects of possible response distortion given in the tests, we have validated them using the scales of Social Desirability and Sincerity of the ATRAMIC test. Males scored higher than females for the factors “Gender Roles” and “Justification and Minimization of Abuse/Violence”. No significant differences were found between genders for either “Couple Relationship/Dominant Emotional Dependence” or “Exoneration for Abuse/Violence”. The variables studied that best predicted “Couple Relationship/Dominant Emotional Dependency” were Exoneration for Abuse /Violence, Hostility, Justification, and Minimization of Violence, Gender Roles, and Social Desirability.
对男性和女性暴力的信念和扭曲思想:攻击性、自尊和反应偏见控制/[对男性和女性暴力的信念和扭曲思想:攻击性、反应偏见的自尊评估]
关于性别角色和对伴侣使用暴力的非理性思想和扭曲信念并不是侵略者所独有的,也可以构成整个社会的一部分。在男性中发现认知偏见和非理性信念是很常见的,特别是指女性的自卑和性别角色。同样,男性倾向于为暴力辩护和最小化,并将虐待归咎于女性。在这项工作中,我们将性别歧视的信念和扭曲的思想与攻击性行为和自尊联系起来。本文采用信度为α .92的夫妻问卷(CREE)中对女性的扭曲信念和想法的析因结构。志愿者样本是来自加那利群岛的223名成年人,102名男性和121名女性(M年龄= 35.25;Sd = 10.46)。为了测量测试中给出的可能的反应扭曲的影响,我们使用了ATRAMIC测试的社会可取性和诚意量表来验证它们。在“性别角色”和“虐待/暴力的正当性和最小化”方面,男性的得分高于女性。在“夫妻关系/主导情感依赖”和“虐待/暴力免责”两项调查中,性别间均无显著差异。研究中最能预测“夫妻关系/主导情感依赖”的变量是虐待/暴力免责、敌意、合理化和最小化暴力、性别角色和社会可取性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信