Comparative study between combined general anesthesia with peribulbar block versus traditional general anesthesia in patients undergoing strabismus surgery

K. Abu eleinen, M. Boulos, M. Abdellatif
{"title":"Comparative study between combined general anesthesia with peribulbar block versus traditional general anesthesia in patients undergoing strabismus surgery","authors":"K. Abu eleinen, M. Boulos, M. Abdellatif","doi":"10.21608/fumj.2022.252704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Strabismus is a common ophthalmic problem that usually requires surgical correction. However, general anesthesia is mandatory for most cases, concomitant local anesthetics administration is preferable to improve patient satisfaction, decrease post-operative analgesic requirements, post-operative pain and oculocardiac reflex (OCR), which is a noted serious com-plication that accompanies such surgeries. Aim of the study: The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of adding peribulbar block (PBB) to general anesthesia on incidence of oculocardiac reflex, postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing unilateral strabismus surgery. Subjects and Methods: 70 patients undergoing strabismus surgery were recruited in the current study. Participants were equally divided into two groups; Group (1) didn’t receive PBB, while Group (2) had a combination of general anesthesia and PBB. Pain evaluation by visual analog score (VAS) was assessed at 2-, 6-, 12-, and 24-hours post-operation. Results: Incidence of OCR was higher in group (1) than in group (2) (25.7% vs. 5.7%), which was a statistically significant, P=0.022. Also, incidence of nausea and vomiting (PONV) was a statistically significantly higher in group (1) than in group 2 (42.9% vs. 17.1%), P=0.019. As regarding VAS score for pain was statistically significantly lower in group (2) than group (1) at two hours (40 vs. 20), six hours (40 vs. 20), twelve hours (20 vs. 0), and twenty-four hours P<0.0001. Conclusion: PBB had a great benefit in strabismus surgery when combined with general anesthesia. It reduced the incidence of OCR, post-operative pain score, and PONV.","PeriodicalId":436341,"journal":{"name":"Fayoum University Medical Journal","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fayoum University Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/fumj.2022.252704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Strabismus is a common ophthalmic problem that usually requires surgical correction. However, general anesthesia is mandatory for most cases, concomitant local anesthetics administration is preferable to improve patient satisfaction, decrease post-operative analgesic requirements, post-operative pain and oculocardiac reflex (OCR), which is a noted serious com-plication that accompanies such surgeries. Aim of the study: The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of adding peribulbar block (PBB) to general anesthesia on incidence of oculocardiac reflex, postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing unilateral strabismus surgery. Subjects and Methods: 70 patients undergoing strabismus surgery were recruited in the current study. Participants were equally divided into two groups; Group (1) didn’t receive PBB, while Group (2) had a combination of general anesthesia and PBB. Pain evaluation by visual analog score (VAS) was assessed at 2-, 6-, 12-, and 24-hours post-operation. Results: Incidence of OCR was higher in group (1) than in group (2) (25.7% vs. 5.7%), which was a statistically significant, P=0.022. Also, incidence of nausea and vomiting (PONV) was a statistically significantly higher in group (1) than in group 2 (42.9% vs. 17.1%), P=0.019. As regarding VAS score for pain was statistically significantly lower in group (2) than group (1) at two hours (40 vs. 20), six hours (40 vs. 20), twelve hours (20 vs. 0), and twenty-four hours P<0.0001. Conclusion: PBB had a great benefit in strabismus surgery when combined with general anesthesia. It reduced the incidence of OCR, post-operative pain score, and PONV.
全麻联合球周阻滞与传统全麻在斜视手术中的比较研究
斜视是一种常见的眼科问题,通常需要手术矫正。然而,在大多数情况下,全身麻醉是强制性的,局部麻醉是最好的,以提高患者的满意度,减少术后镇痛需求,术后疼痛和心眼反射(OCR),这是一个值得注意的严重并发症,伴随这类手术。研究目的:本研究旨在评价在全麻基础上加用球周阻滞(PBB)对单侧斜视手术患者心房反射、术后疼痛、恶心和呕吐(PONV)发生率的影响。对象和方法:本研究招募了70例斜视手术患者。参与者平均分为两组;组(1)不给予PBB,组(2)全麻加PBB。分别于术后2、6、12、24小时采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评价疼痛。结果:OCR发生率(1)组高于(2)组(25.7%比5.7%),差异有统计学意义(P=0.022)。恶心呕吐(PONV)发生率(42.9% vs. 17.1%)组(1组)高于2组(P =0.019)。组(2)疼痛VAS评分在2小时(40比20)、6小时(40比20)、12小时(20比0)、24小时均低于组(1),P<0.0001。结论:PBB配合全麻治疗斜视手术效果显著。它降低了OCR的发生率、术后疼痛评分和PONV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信