Comparative study between combined general anesthesia with peribulbar block versus traditional general anesthesia in patients undergoing strabismus surgery
{"title":"Comparative study between combined general anesthesia with peribulbar block versus traditional general anesthesia in patients undergoing strabismus surgery","authors":"K. Abu eleinen, M. Boulos, M. Abdellatif","doi":"10.21608/fumj.2022.252704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Strabismus is a common ophthalmic problem that usually requires surgical correction. However, general anesthesia is mandatory for most cases, concomitant local anesthetics administration is preferable to improve patient satisfaction, decrease post-operative analgesic requirements, post-operative pain and oculocardiac reflex (OCR), which is a noted serious com-plication that accompanies such surgeries. Aim of the study: The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of adding peribulbar block (PBB) to general anesthesia on incidence of oculocardiac reflex, postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing unilateral strabismus surgery. Subjects and Methods: 70 patients undergoing strabismus surgery were recruited in the current study. Participants were equally divided into two groups; Group (1) didn’t receive PBB, while Group (2) had a combination of general anesthesia and PBB. Pain evaluation by visual analog score (VAS) was assessed at 2-, 6-, 12-, and 24-hours post-operation. Results: Incidence of OCR was higher in group (1) than in group (2) (25.7% vs. 5.7%), which was a statistically significant, P=0.022. Also, incidence of nausea and vomiting (PONV) was a statistically significantly higher in group (1) than in group 2 (42.9% vs. 17.1%), P=0.019. As regarding VAS score for pain was statistically significantly lower in group (2) than group (1) at two hours (40 vs. 20), six hours (40 vs. 20), twelve hours (20 vs. 0), and twenty-four hours P<0.0001. Conclusion: PBB had a great benefit in strabismus surgery when combined with general anesthesia. It reduced the incidence of OCR, post-operative pain score, and PONV.","PeriodicalId":436341,"journal":{"name":"Fayoum University Medical Journal","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fayoum University Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/fumj.2022.252704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Strabismus is a common ophthalmic problem that usually requires surgical correction. However, general anesthesia is mandatory for most cases, concomitant local anesthetics administration is preferable to improve patient satisfaction, decrease post-operative analgesic requirements, post-operative pain and oculocardiac reflex (OCR), which is a noted serious com-plication that accompanies such surgeries. Aim of the study: The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of adding peribulbar block (PBB) to general anesthesia on incidence of oculocardiac reflex, postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing unilateral strabismus surgery. Subjects and Methods: 70 patients undergoing strabismus surgery were recruited in the current study. Participants were equally divided into two groups; Group (1) didn’t receive PBB, while Group (2) had a combination of general anesthesia and PBB. Pain evaluation by visual analog score (VAS) was assessed at 2-, 6-, 12-, and 24-hours post-operation. Results: Incidence of OCR was higher in group (1) than in group (2) (25.7% vs. 5.7%), which was a statistically significant, P=0.022. Also, incidence of nausea and vomiting (PONV) was a statistically significantly higher in group (1) than in group 2 (42.9% vs. 17.1%), P=0.019. As regarding VAS score for pain was statistically significantly lower in group (2) than group (1) at two hours (40 vs. 20), six hours (40 vs. 20), twelve hours (20 vs. 0), and twenty-four hours P<0.0001. Conclusion: PBB had a great benefit in strabismus surgery when combined with general anesthesia. It reduced the incidence of OCR, post-operative pain score, and PONV.
斜视是一种常见的眼科问题,通常需要手术矫正。然而,在大多数情况下,全身麻醉是强制性的,局部麻醉是最好的,以提高患者的满意度,减少术后镇痛需求,术后疼痛和心眼反射(OCR),这是一个值得注意的严重并发症,伴随这类手术。研究目的:本研究旨在评价在全麻基础上加用球周阻滞(PBB)对单侧斜视手术患者心房反射、术后疼痛、恶心和呕吐(PONV)发生率的影响。对象和方法:本研究招募了70例斜视手术患者。参与者平均分为两组;组(1)不给予PBB,组(2)全麻加PBB。分别于术后2、6、12、24小时采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评价疼痛。结果:OCR发生率(1)组高于(2)组(25.7%比5.7%),差异有统计学意义(P=0.022)。恶心呕吐(PONV)发生率(42.9% vs. 17.1%)组(1组)高于2组(P =0.019)。组(2)疼痛VAS评分在2小时(40比20)、6小时(40比20)、12小时(20比0)、24小时均低于组(1),P<0.0001。结论:PBB配合全麻治疗斜视手术效果显著。它降低了OCR的发生率、术后疼痛评分和PONV。