Implications of non-anode effect-related PFC emissions from primary aluminium

J. Marks, S. Rand
{"title":"Implications of non-anode effect-related PFC emissions from primary aluminium","authors":"J. Marks, S. Rand","doi":"10.1080/20430779.2012.659731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Smelter exhaust measurements for perfluorocarbon (PFC) emissions were carried out at 13 facilities in China from 2008 to 2010. The work has resulted in better global inventory of PFC emissions from primary aluminium production by having a measurement database of emission factors from Chinese aluminium producers. The measurements made in China revealed that PFC emissions could be produced during primary aluminium production that do not relate directly to anode effects. Although these emissions are much lower than during anode effects, they are generally always present and, therefore, are potentially substantial. Evaluations of two possible causes were completed, however, both were inconclusive. First, whether the non-anode effect (NAE)-related emissions are related to imbalances in anode current. Second, whether emissions were related to imbalances in cell voltage. Further investigations are needed to identify the root cause and to identify options to reduce these emissions. Although these NAE-related emissions were discovered in Chinese smelters, industry should investigate to see whether similar emissions might be occurring in smelters outside China at lower levels. In addition, the discovery of the NAE emissions necessitates the reexamination of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) methodology for calculating PFC emissions. The current methodology is based on the presumption that anode effects are responsible for all PFC emissions and, therefore, PFC emissions can be calculated from anode effect process data alone.","PeriodicalId":411329,"journal":{"name":"Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20430779.2012.659731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Smelter exhaust measurements for perfluorocarbon (PFC) emissions were carried out at 13 facilities in China from 2008 to 2010. The work has resulted in better global inventory of PFC emissions from primary aluminium production by having a measurement database of emission factors from Chinese aluminium producers. The measurements made in China revealed that PFC emissions could be produced during primary aluminium production that do not relate directly to anode effects. Although these emissions are much lower than during anode effects, they are generally always present and, therefore, are potentially substantial. Evaluations of two possible causes were completed, however, both were inconclusive. First, whether the non-anode effect (NAE)-related emissions are related to imbalances in anode current. Second, whether emissions were related to imbalances in cell voltage. Further investigations are needed to identify the root cause and to identify options to reduce these emissions. Although these NAE-related emissions were discovered in Chinese smelters, industry should investigate to see whether similar emissions might be occurring in smelters outside China at lower levels. In addition, the discovery of the NAE emissions necessitates the reexamination of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) methodology for calculating PFC emissions. The current methodology is based on the presumption that anode effects are responsible for all PFC emissions and, therefore, PFC emissions can be calculated from anode effect process data alone.
原铝非阳极效应相关PFC排放的含义
2008年至2010年,在中国的13家冶炼厂进行了全氟化碳(PFC)排放废气测量。通过建立中国铝生产商排放因子的测量数据库,这项工作已使全球对原铝生产的PFC排放情况有了更好的了解。在中国进行的测量显示,PFC排放可能在原铝生产过程中产生,与阳极效应没有直接关系。虽然这些排放远低于阳极效应期间,但它们通常总是存在,因此可能是实质性的。对两种可能原因的评估已经完成,但都没有定论。首先,非阳极效应(NAE)相关发射是否与阳极电流不平衡有关。第二,排放物是否与电池电压不平衡有关。需要进一步调查以确定根本原因并确定减少这些排放的备选方案。虽然在中国的冶炼厂中发现了与nae相关的排放,但业界应该调查一下,中国以外的冶炼厂是否也可能出现类似的排放,但排放水平较低。此外,NAE排放的发现需要对政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)计算PFC排放的方法进行重新审查。目前的方法是基于阳极效应导致所有PFC排放的假设,因此,PFC排放可以单独从阳极效应过程数据计算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信