COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS FOR HPV MITIGATION STRATEGIES IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA BASED ON INFECTIOUS DISEASE MODELLING

A. Jarynowski
{"title":"COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS FOR HPV MITIGATION STRATEGIES IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA BASED ON INFECTIOUS DISEASE MODELLING","authors":"A. Jarynowski","doi":"10.36004/nier.es.2019.2-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a sexually transmittable virus infection, which is a necessary risk factor for developing cervical cancer, first killer for working women in Moldova. Since 2018 Moldova has modified the screening program and the vaccination program (mainly funded externally). To assess the performance of the mitigation policy we propose the cost-effectiveness analysis according to 2 already implemented strategies. (1) Vaccination of a single age-cohort, although vaccinating a single cohort may not have a substantial effect in other countries with distinct socio-economic situation. (2) Transition to more technologically advance screening ecosystem (changing from Romanowski to Pap smear), which might not necessary be cost-efficient in low resource settings (if GDP per capita doesn’t grow substantially at the same time). (1) We verified that single cohort vaccination is both cost-beneficial (total costs reduction will balance intervention costs around the year 2040) and cost-efficient (with incremental impact in 20 years perspective on the level of 2300 EUR/QALY). Moreover, we found out that single year cohort is more beneficial than 5- years cohort vaccination scenarios in our mathematical model. This behaviour could be explained by a transitional situation in Moldova (HPV epidemic is near outbreak threshold), still small changes of model parameters and initial conditions could cause strong effect in the epidemiology. However, a definitive answer cannot be given with the chosen methodology. (2) Transition between Romanowski -> Pap smear cytology in screening benefits unquestionably in epidemiology e.g. due to a higher specificity. However, further maintenance and higher procedure costs could exceed treatment costs, hence intervention costs would gather an unacceptable share of national resources that are limited and that are dedicated to public health","PeriodicalId":156575,"journal":{"name":"ECONOMY AND SOCIOLOGY: Theoretical and Scientifical Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECONOMY AND SOCIOLOGY: Theoretical and Scientifical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36004/nier.es.2019.2-05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a sexually transmittable virus infection, which is a necessary risk factor for developing cervical cancer, first killer for working women in Moldova. Since 2018 Moldova has modified the screening program and the vaccination program (mainly funded externally). To assess the performance of the mitigation policy we propose the cost-effectiveness analysis according to 2 already implemented strategies. (1) Vaccination of a single age-cohort, although vaccinating a single cohort may not have a substantial effect in other countries with distinct socio-economic situation. (2) Transition to more technologically advance screening ecosystem (changing from Romanowski to Pap smear), which might not necessary be cost-efficient in low resource settings (if GDP per capita doesn’t grow substantially at the same time). (1) We verified that single cohort vaccination is both cost-beneficial (total costs reduction will balance intervention costs around the year 2040) and cost-efficient (with incremental impact in 20 years perspective on the level of 2300 EUR/QALY). Moreover, we found out that single year cohort is more beneficial than 5- years cohort vaccination scenarios in our mathematical model. This behaviour could be explained by a transitional situation in Moldova (HPV epidemic is near outbreak threshold), still small changes of model parameters and initial conditions could cause strong effect in the epidemiology. However, a definitive answer cannot be given with the chosen methodology. (2) Transition between Romanowski -> Pap smear cytology in screening benefits unquestionably in epidemiology e.g. due to a higher specificity. However, further maintenance and higher procedure costs could exceed treatment costs, hence intervention costs would gather an unacceptable share of national resources that are limited and that are dedicated to public health
基于传染病模型的摩尔多瓦共和国人乳头瘤病毒缓解战略的成本效益分析
人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)是一种性传播病毒感染,是患宫颈癌的必要危险因素,是摩尔多瓦职业妇女的头号杀手。自2018年以来,摩尔多瓦修改了筛查方案和疫苗接种方案(主要由外部资助)。为了评估缓解政策的绩效,我们建议根据2项已经实施的战略进行成本效益分析。(1)单一年龄组的疫苗接种,尽管在其他社会经济状况不同的国家,单一年龄组的疫苗接种可能不会产生实质性效果。(2)向技术更先进的筛查生态系统过渡(从罗曼诺夫斯基转向巴氏涂片),在资源匮乏的环境下(如果人均GDP没有同时大幅增长),这可能不一定具有成本效益。(1)我们验证了单队列疫苗接种既具有成本效益(总成本降低将在2040年左右平衡干预成本)又具有成本效益(在2300欧元/QALY水平上20年的增量影响)。此外,我们发现在我们的数学模型中,单年队列比5年队列疫苗接种方案更有益。这种行为可以用摩尔多瓦的过渡情况(人乳头瘤病毒流行接近爆发阈值)来解释,但模型参数和初始条件的微小变化仍可能对流行病学产生强烈影响。然而,所选择的方法无法给出明确的答案。(2)从罗曼诺夫斯基筛查到巴氏涂片细胞学筛查的转变无疑在流行病学中有好处,例如由于更高的特异性。然而,进一步的维护和更高的程序费用可能超过治疗费用,因此干预费用将占用有限的、专门用于公共卫生的国家资源的不可接受的份额
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信