Beyond the Realism of Mainstream Economic Theory. Phenomenology in Economics.

Peter Galbács
{"title":"Beyond the Realism of Mainstream Economic Theory. Phenomenology in Economics.","authors":"Peter Galbács","doi":"10.18559/EBR.2016.4.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since it evolved into its current form, mainstream economics relies strongly on mathematical tools and methods. Although using ideal types (as Max Weber used the term) is not the only way of exploring and studying the real world, economic theory has not paid considerable attention to those phenomenological methods that generated a renewal of sociology, mainly in the United States, decades ago. In this paper, some specialties of phenomenology as a method of social sciences are reviewed that make it suitable for being the foundation of a research program in economics to complement results we already have. In Section 1 a general introduction is given in which the mathematical approach of economics and its shortcomings are reviewed. The main emphasis is on the evident realization that 'homo oeconomicus' cannot help us to understand real economic agents' behavior and their motives. In Section 2 phenomenology is suggested as a general end comprehensive way of studying and understanding socio-economic reality. Some of Husserl's main ideas are surveyed that are important from the point of view of phenomenological sociology, that is, our guide in questioning economic life. The main concept of Section 3 is 'Life World'. Husserl described our life world as the unquestioned basis our everyday life and knowledge. Following the way that phenomenological sociology has already walked we get to the general strategy of people by which they make real world surrounding them understandable. Types as the fundamental navigation instrument stand in the center of our attention in Section 4. All the elements and agents of our life world are directed under types by which people can make anticipations on the behavior of their fellow-men. In Section 5 we get to experimental economics, referring to the famous and well-known experiments of Vernon L. Smith on market bubbles. Economists know that market bubbles disappear after 2 or 3 experiments done with the same agents - by that time rules and patterns of other players' actions get known to all the agents participating in the game. Phenomenology can offer new aspects to consider: as agents get into a new milieu that laboratory makes they have to abandon the validity of their types of cognition. As more and more turns are taken in the game, these types regain their validity and they can become available when it comes to direct actions in the laboratory again.","PeriodicalId":253539,"journal":{"name":"PRN: 20th Century Philosophy (Topic)","volume":"140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRN: 20th Century Philosophy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18559/EBR.2016.4.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Since it evolved into its current form, mainstream economics relies strongly on mathematical tools and methods. Although using ideal types (as Max Weber used the term) is not the only way of exploring and studying the real world, economic theory has not paid considerable attention to those phenomenological methods that generated a renewal of sociology, mainly in the United States, decades ago. In this paper, some specialties of phenomenology as a method of social sciences are reviewed that make it suitable for being the foundation of a research program in economics to complement results we already have. In Section 1 a general introduction is given in which the mathematical approach of economics and its shortcomings are reviewed. The main emphasis is on the evident realization that 'homo oeconomicus' cannot help us to understand real economic agents' behavior and their motives. In Section 2 phenomenology is suggested as a general end comprehensive way of studying and understanding socio-economic reality. Some of Husserl's main ideas are surveyed that are important from the point of view of phenomenological sociology, that is, our guide in questioning economic life. The main concept of Section 3 is 'Life World'. Husserl described our life world as the unquestioned basis our everyday life and knowledge. Following the way that phenomenological sociology has already walked we get to the general strategy of people by which they make real world surrounding them understandable. Types as the fundamental navigation instrument stand in the center of our attention in Section 4. All the elements and agents of our life world are directed under types by which people can make anticipations on the behavior of their fellow-men. In Section 5 we get to experimental economics, referring to the famous and well-known experiments of Vernon L. Smith on market bubbles. Economists know that market bubbles disappear after 2 or 3 experiments done with the same agents - by that time rules and patterns of other players' actions get known to all the agents participating in the game. Phenomenology can offer new aspects to consider: as agents get into a new milieu that laboratory makes they have to abandon the validity of their types of cognition. As more and more turns are taken in the game, these types regain their validity and they can become available when it comes to direct actions in the laboratory again.
超越主流经济理论的现实主义。经济学现象学。
自从主流经济学发展到今天的形式以来,它在很大程度上依赖于数学工具和方法。虽然使用理想类型(正如马克斯·韦伯所使用的术语)并不是探索和研究现实世界的唯一方法,但经济理论并没有对那些现象学方法给予足够的关注,这些方法在几十年前主要在美国产生了社会学的复兴。本文回顾了现象学作为一种社会科学方法的一些特点,使其适合作为经济学研究项目的基础,以补充我们已有的成果。在第1节一般介绍,其中经济学的数学方法和它的缺点进行了审查。主要的重点在于一个明显的认识,即“经济人”不能帮助我们理解真实经济主体的行为及其动机。第二节提出现象学是研究和理解社会经济现实的一种综合方法。从现象学社会学的角度考察胡塞尔的一些重要思想,即对我们质疑经济生活的指导。第三部分的主要概念是“生活世界”。胡塞尔将我们的生活世界描述为我们日常生活和知识的不容置疑的基础。沿着现象学社会学已经走过的路,我们来到了人们的一般策略,通过这种策略,人们可以理解周围的现实世界。类型作为基本的导航仪器,在第四节中我们将重点关注。我们生活世界的一切要素和动因都是按照某种类型来指导的,人们据此可以对他人的行为作出预测。在第五节中,我们谈到了实验经济学,指的是弗农·l·史密斯关于市场泡沫的著名实验。经济学家知道,市场泡沫会在同一代理人进行2到3次实验后消失——到那时,所有参与游戏的代理人都知道其他参与者的行为规则和模式。现象学可以提供新的方面来考虑:当主体进入实验室创造的新环境时,他们不得不放弃他们的认知类型的有效性。随着游戏中出现越来越多的回合,这些类型便会重新获得其有效性,并在实验室中再次出现直接行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信