Understanding Austerity: Its Reach and Presence in the Changing Context of Work and Employment

D. Baines, I. Cunningham
{"title":"Understanding Austerity: Its Reach and Presence in the Changing Context of Work and Employment","authors":"D. Baines, I. Cunningham","doi":"10.46692/9781529208689.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This introductory chapter sketches out some of the major debates concerning austerity, neoliberalism, and work. Austerity is viewed as a set of interwoven policies aimed at reducing public debt and expenditure, increasing consumer taxes and purportedly stimulating economic wellbeing through corporate tax cuts and support for private business. Since the 1970s, austerity policies have been closely associated with neoliberalism, a set of policies and processes that valorize the private-market as the solution to all social and economic problems and seek to reduce or eliminate social entitlements and public provision. Evidence confirms that austerity has widened existing inequalities based on the intersecting social relations of class, gender, and race. Indeed, austerity has been characterized as a highly gendered and racialized phenomenon, with public sector retrenchment producing substantial job losses in relatively better paid and more secure female-majority, race-friendly public sector jobs, such as social care, healthcare, education, and general services. Resistance in the era of austerity can be found among all groups of workers, although the adaptability and ideological dominance of late neoliberalism frequently seems to circumvent or defuse the impacts of strategies undertaken to improve the lives and conditions of working people.","PeriodicalId":289935,"journal":{"name":"Working in the Context of Austerity","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Working in the Context of Austerity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529208689.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This introductory chapter sketches out some of the major debates concerning austerity, neoliberalism, and work. Austerity is viewed as a set of interwoven policies aimed at reducing public debt and expenditure, increasing consumer taxes and purportedly stimulating economic wellbeing through corporate tax cuts and support for private business. Since the 1970s, austerity policies have been closely associated with neoliberalism, a set of policies and processes that valorize the private-market as the solution to all social and economic problems and seek to reduce or eliminate social entitlements and public provision. Evidence confirms that austerity has widened existing inequalities based on the intersecting social relations of class, gender, and race. Indeed, austerity has been characterized as a highly gendered and racialized phenomenon, with public sector retrenchment producing substantial job losses in relatively better paid and more secure female-majority, race-friendly public sector jobs, such as social care, healthcare, education, and general services. Resistance in the era of austerity can be found among all groups of workers, although the adaptability and ideological dominance of late neoliberalism frequently seems to circumvent or defuse the impacts of strategies undertaken to improve the lives and conditions of working people.
理解紧缩:它在不断变化的工作和就业环境中的影响和存在
本导论章概述了一些关于紧缩、新自由主义和工作的主要辩论。紧缩被视为一套相互交织的政策,旨在减少公共债务和支出,增加消费税,并据称通过削减公司税和支持私营企业来刺激经济福祉。自20世纪70年代以来,紧缩政策一直与新自由主义密切相关,新自由主义是一套政策和过程,旨在将私人市场作为所有社会和经济问题的解决方案,并寻求减少或消除社会权利和公共供应。有证据证实,紧缩扩大了基于阶级、性别和种族等交叉社会关系的现有不平等。实际上,紧缩已被定性为一种高度性别化和种族化的现象,公共部门的紧缩在薪酬相对较高、更有保障、以女性为主、对种族友好的公共部门工作岗位上造成大量失业,如社会护理、医疗保健、教育和一般服务等。尽管新自由主义晚期的适应性和意识形态的主导地位似乎经常规避或化解为改善劳动人民的生活和条件而采取的战略的影响,但在紧缩时代的所有工人群体中都可以找到阻力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书