Mathematics and physical reality: The theme of the absence of the “Transcendental Signified” in the language of modern fundamental science

Y. M. Duplinskya
{"title":"Mathematics and physical reality: The theme of the absence of the “Transcendental Signified” in the language of modern fundamental science","authors":"Y. M. Duplinskya","doi":"10.18500/1819-7671-2023-23-2-139-143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. It is argued that today the expansion of mathematics into the field of physical reality is not being performed in line with the classical paradigm, but in line with the linguistic turn of non-classical philosophy. Theoretical analysis. Such aspect of nature’s “non-fittability” into the conceptual network of mathematics as the problem of asymmetry is explored. It is stated that the world, constructed according to the logic of ideal mathematical symmetries, passes into a state called unmanifested in Hinduism. In the same direction the concept of J. Baudrillard is considered, where the structures of ideal reversibility are supposed to be the most radical way to destroy what exists and the symbol of nothingness. Accordingly, ideal mathematical symmetry describes states that cannot exist as a physical reality. The settlement of “dense” reality in the mathematical language of theoretical physics is seen in irrational, transcendent and imaginary numbers, in which the ideal reversibility of mathematical operations is violated. Conclusion. The search for “supersymmetry” is regarded as a variation of general language problems. Ideal symmetry in mathematics, “supersymmetry” in fundamental physics, like any “transcendental signified”, can only exist “under the sign of strikeout”. Variations on the theme of differance are revealed here. A generating source of difference, according to J. Derrida, is always on the other side of the language.","PeriodicalId":252065,"journal":{"name":"Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2023-23-2-139-143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. It is argued that today the expansion of mathematics into the field of physical reality is not being performed in line with the classical paradigm, but in line with the linguistic turn of non-classical philosophy. Theoretical analysis. Such aspect of nature’s “non-fittability” into the conceptual network of mathematics as the problem of asymmetry is explored. It is stated that the world, constructed according to the logic of ideal mathematical symmetries, passes into a state called unmanifested in Hinduism. In the same direction the concept of J. Baudrillard is considered, where the structures of ideal reversibility are supposed to be the most radical way to destroy what exists and the symbol of nothingness. Accordingly, ideal mathematical symmetry describes states that cannot exist as a physical reality. The settlement of “dense” reality in the mathematical language of theoretical physics is seen in irrational, transcendent and imaginary numbers, in which the ideal reversibility of mathematical operations is violated. Conclusion. The search for “supersymmetry” is regarded as a variation of general language problems. Ideal symmetry in mathematics, “supersymmetry” in fundamental physics, like any “transcendental signified”, can only exist “under the sign of strikeout”. Variations on the theme of differance are revealed here. A generating source of difference, according to J. Derrida, is always on the other side of the language.
数学与物理实在:现代基础科学语言中“先验所指”缺失的主题
介绍。有人认为,今天数学向物理现实领域的扩展并不是按照经典范式进行的,而是按照非经典哲学的语言转向进行的。理论分析。将自然界的“不适宜性”纳入数学的概念网络,即不对称问题进行了探讨。据说,根据理想数学对称的逻辑构建的世界,在印度教中进入了一种被称为“未显化”的状态。在同一方向上,J. Baudrillard的概念被认为是理想可逆性的结构被认为是摧毁存在的东西和虚无的象征的最激进的方式。因此,理想的数学对称描述了不能作为物理现实存在的状态。在理论物理的数学语言中,“密集”实在的解决可以在无理数、超越数和虚数中看到,其中数学运算的理想可逆性被违反了。结论。对“超对称”的探索被视为一般语言问题的一种变体。数学中的理想对称,基础物理中的“超对称”,就像任何“先验所指”一样,只能存在于“三振出局的标志下”。这里揭示了差异主题的变奏。根据德里达的说法,产生差异的来源总是在语言的另一边。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信