{"title":"Lenin’s Lens: The Occupy Movement, an Infantile Disorder?","authors":"J. Ibrahim, J. Roberts","doi":"10.20897/JCASC/3117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper offers a theoretical critique of the Occupy movement by drawing on V.I. Lenin’s work, Left-wing Communism: an Infantile Disorder (LWC). This work emphasizes the importance of recognizing political power within institutionalized political systems, for example, trade unions and parliamentary democracy. We bring the ideas contained in this work to bear on the Occupy movement by drawing on 20 activist accounts from two UK Occupy camps to argue that the Occupy movement was an earlier phase of a developing political challenge to neoliberalism. In this respect, Occupy was an immature politics unlikely to lead to social change. However, recent research suggests that the creation of a new wave of ‘movement parties’ (della Porta et al., 2017) are a more organized and politically mature response to neoliberal austerity, which to some extent grew out of the mass movement assemblies like the Occupy movement. By applying Lenin’s ideas to analyse the main political practices of Occupy, this paper argues that a Leninist viewpoint could offer some practical improvements towards the political strategy of new movements by being part of a coalition of activists and trade unionists, with the ultimate aim of working within parliamentary democracy.","PeriodicalId":274162,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20897/JCASC/3117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
This paper offers a theoretical critique of the Occupy movement by drawing on V.I. Lenin’s work, Left-wing Communism: an Infantile Disorder (LWC). This work emphasizes the importance of recognizing political power within institutionalized political systems, for example, trade unions and parliamentary democracy. We bring the ideas contained in this work to bear on the Occupy movement by drawing on 20 activist accounts from two UK Occupy camps to argue that the Occupy movement was an earlier phase of a developing political challenge to neoliberalism. In this respect, Occupy was an immature politics unlikely to lead to social change. However, recent research suggests that the creation of a new wave of ‘movement parties’ (della Porta et al., 2017) are a more organized and politically mature response to neoliberal austerity, which to some extent grew out of the mass movement assemblies like the Occupy movement. By applying Lenin’s ideas to analyse the main political practices of Occupy, this paper argues that a Leninist viewpoint could offer some practical improvements towards the political strategy of new movements by being part of a coalition of activists and trade unionists, with the ultimate aim of working within parliamentary democracy.
本文借鉴列宁的著作《左翼共产主义:一种幼稚的紊乱》,对占领运动进行了理论批判。这项工作强调在制度化的政治制度,例如工会和议会民主中承认政治权力的重要性。我们通过引用来自英国两个占领阵营的20位活动家的描述,将本书中包含的思想运用到占领运动中,以证明占领运动是对新自由主义发展的政治挑战的早期阶段。在这方面,占领运动是一种不成熟的政治,不太可能导致社会变革。然而,最近的研究表明,新一波“运动政党”(della Porta et al., 2017)的创建是对新自由主义紧缩政策的一种更有组织和政治上成熟的回应,这在某种程度上源于占领运动等群众运动集会。通过运用列宁的思想来分析“占领”运动的主要政治实践,本文认为,列宁主义的观点可以为新运动的政治策略提供一些实际的改进,通过成为积极分子和工会会员联盟的一部分,最终目标是在议会民主中工作。