Sakthi Soundarya Lakshmi, S. Aparna, P. Madankumar
{"title":"A geospatial analysis of factors influencing clinical decision-making of rural and urban dental practitioners in Tiruppur district","authors":"Sakthi Soundarya Lakshmi, S. Aparna, P. Madankumar","doi":"10.25259/jadpr_46_2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe core of dental practice is clinical decision-making. Geographic information system was used in our study to evaluate the clinical decision-making of dental practitioners in urban and rural Tiruppur district, Tamil Nadu.\n\n\n\nThis cross-sectional study included 50 certified dental practitioners from both urban and rural areas. The research was conducted in June 2022. The tem-item and self-administered questionnaire was designed to collect data on practitioner, patient, and provider characteristics. The questionnaire was distributed to participants through an online Google form forum, and the results, clinical decision-making, were quantified using a series of hypothetical case situations. The association between rural and urban dental practitioners was assessed using the “Chi-square test.”\n\n\n\nTwenty-six (14 [56%] urban and 12 [48%] rural practitioners) chosen the most conservative treatment approach of coronoplasty for asymptomatic impacted mandibular 3rd molar. Thirty (17 [68%] urban and 13 [52%]) rural practitioners preferred the conservative treatment plan of removal of caries followed by GIC Restoration for class I dental caries in a 7-year-old child. For the case scenario relation to class I malocclusion with spacing, 16 (64%) of urban dental practitioners preferred aligner-based treatment rather than fixed orthodontic appliance. This treatment choice differs statistically between urban and rural practitioners.\n\n\n\nThe current research revealed an association between non-clinical features and dental professionals’ self-reported treatment preferences. It provides a foundation for future research into the elements hypothesized to impact dentists’ treatment decisions.\n","PeriodicalId":265132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Dental Practice and Research","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Dental Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/jadpr_46_2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The core of dental practice is clinical decision-making. Geographic information system was used in our study to evaluate the clinical decision-making of dental practitioners in urban and rural Tiruppur district, Tamil Nadu.
This cross-sectional study included 50 certified dental practitioners from both urban and rural areas. The research was conducted in June 2022. The tem-item and self-administered questionnaire was designed to collect data on practitioner, patient, and provider characteristics. The questionnaire was distributed to participants through an online Google form forum, and the results, clinical decision-making, were quantified using a series of hypothetical case situations. The association between rural and urban dental practitioners was assessed using the “Chi-square test.”
Twenty-six (14 [56%] urban and 12 [48%] rural practitioners) chosen the most conservative treatment approach of coronoplasty for asymptomatic impacted mandibular 3rd molar. Thirty (17 [68%] urban and 13 [52%]) rural practitioners preferred the conservative treatment plan of removal of caries followed by GIC Restoration for class I dental caries in a 7-year-old child. For the case scenario relation to class I malocclusion with spacing, 16 (64%) of urban dental practitioners preferred aligner-based treatment rather than fixed orthodontic appliance. This treatment choice differs statistically between urban and rural practitioners.
The current research revealed an association between non-clinical features and dental professionals’ self-reported treatment preferences. It provides a foundation for future research into the elements hypothesized to impact dentists’ treatment decisions.