Information Sources and Training Needs on Medical Marijuana- Preliminary Results from a State-wide Provider Survey

Ruba Sajdeya, J. Jean-Jacques, A. Shavers, Yan Wang, N. Pipitone, M. Rosenthal, A. Winterstein, R. Cook
{"title":"Information Sources and Training Needs on Medical Marijuana- Preliminary Results from a State-wide Provider Survey","authors":"Ruba Sajdeya, J. Jean-Jacques, A. Shavers, Yan Wang, N. Pipitone, M. Rosenthal, A. Winterstein, R. Cook","doi":"10.26828/cannabis.2021.01.000.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Medical marijuana (MMJ) is legal in the state of Florida for the treatment of specific qualifying medical conditions.1,2 As of July 2020, over 2,450 physicians are authorized to order MMJ, and 360,000 patients are registered in Florida’s MMJ program.3 With this rapid uptake come concerns regarding physicians’ knowledge about MMJ,4–7 and the lack of preparing physicians-in-training to manage MMJ.4,7,8 We conducted a state-wide survey of certified MMJ providers in Florida. The survey was developed by the Consortium for Medical Marijuana Clinical Outcomes research team. The aim of the survey was to inform physicians of the mission of the consortium, which is to support and disseminate research. The survey items were developed accordingly, and the survey was pilot tested with a small group of physicians. We identified all physicians licensed to certify patients for MMJ who care currently practicing in the State of Florida (n=1609), to investigate their information sources and training needs regarding MMJ. The survey was disseminated via mail and email, including a $40 incentive for survey completion. Preliminary responses from 51 (5%) providers (mean age 56, 74% male) are summarized here. The sample included providers from 22 Florida counties and represented a broad range of medical specialties. The majority (92%) practiced in both medical marijuana and traditional medical practice. To learn about MMJ, 98% used research articles, 90% used online sources, 86% learned from dispensary staff, 84% learned from discussions with other providers, 72% used books, 65% used conferences, 61% used magazines, and 35% had a personal experience with marijuana. The sources most cited as “very useful” were conferences (51%), research articles (50%), discussions with other providers (47%), and online sources (47%). Topics rated as a high priority for training included drug-MMJ interactions (80%), strategies to help patients reduce their use of opioids or other drugs (80%), information about the selection of doses and CBD: THC ratios (80%), evidence for managing specific medical conditions or symptoms (78%), information about the effect of different phytocannabinoids and terpenes (75%), advantages and disadvantages of specific modes of delivery (71%), general updates on research findings (71%), educational information about the endocannabinoid system (67%), the safety of medical marijuana use (55%), identification and management of cannabis use disorder (51%), and comparison of products available in different dispensaries (49%). The majority of providers either strongly agreed or agreed (77%) that they could provide better care if they knew which products their patients receive at dispensaries. Physicians use a blend of primary research, online sources, and exchanges with colleagues to learn about MMJ. Perceived needs for more pharmacological information and indication-specific detail for treatment regimen were high. Most physicians believe that details on dispensed MMJ would improve patient care.","PeriodicalId":383892,"journal":{"name":"Abstracts from the 2020 Virtual Scientific Meeting of the Research Society on Marijuana July 24th, 2020","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abstracts from the 2020 Virtual Scientific Meeting of the Research Society on Marijuana July 24th, 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26828/cannabis.2021.01.000.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical marijuana (MMJ) is legal in the state of Florida for the treatment of specific qualifying medical conditions.1,2 As of July 2020, over 2,450 physicians are authorized to order MMJ, and 360,000 patients are registered in Florida’s MMJ program.3 With this rapid uptake come concerns regarding physicians’ knowledge about MMJ,4–7 and the lack of preparing physicians-in-training to manage MMJ.4,7,8 We conducted a state-wide survey of certified MMJ providers in Florida. The survey was developed by the Consortium for Medical Marijuana Clinical Outcomes research team. The aim of the survey was to inform physicians of the mission of the consortium, which is to support and disseminate research. The survey items were developed accordingly, and the survey was pilot tested with a small group of physicians. We identified all physicians licensed to certify patients for MMJ who care currently practicing in the State of Florida (n=1609), to investigate their information sources and training needs regarding MMJ. The survey was disseminated via mail and email, including a $40 incentive for survey completion. Preliminary responses from 51 (5%) providers (mean age 56, 74% male) are summarized here. The sample included providers from 22 Florida counties and represented a broad range of medical specialties. The majority (92%) practiced in both medical marijuana and traditional medical practice. To learn about MMJ, 98% used research articles, 90% used online sources, 86% learned from dispensary staff, 84% learned from discussions with other providers, 72% used books, 65% used conferences, 61% used magazines, and 35% had a personal experience with marijuana. The sources most cited as “very useful” were conferences (51%), research articles (50%), discussions with other providers (47%), and online sources (47%). Topics rated as a high priority for training included drug-MMJ interactions (80%), strategies to help patients reduce their use of opioids or other drugs (80%), information about the selection of doses and CBD: THC ratios (80%), evidence for managing specific medical conditions or symptoms (78%), information about the effect of different phytocannabinoids and terpenes (75%), advantages and disadvantages of specific modes of delivery (71%), general updates on research findings (71%), educational information about the endocannabinoid system (67%), the safety of medical marijuana use (55%), identification and management of cannabis use disorder (51%), and comparison of products available in different dispensaries (49%). The majority of providers either strongly agreed or agreed (77%) that they could provide better care if they knew which products their patients receive at dispensaries. Physicians use a blend of primary research, online sources, and exchanges with colleagues to learn about MMJ. Perceived needs for more pharmacological information and indication-specific detail for treatment regimen were high. Most physicians believe that details on dispensed MMJ would improve patient care.
关于医用大麻的信息来源和培训需求——来自全州供应商调查的初步结果
医用大麻(MMJ)在佛罗里达州是合法的,用于治疗特定的合格医疗条件。截至2020年7月,超过2,450名医生被授权订购MMJ, 360,000名患者在佛罗里达州的MMJ计划中注册随着这种快速发展,人们开始关注医生对MMJ的知识,4-7,以及缺乏准备好的培训医生来管理MMJ。我们在佛罗里达州对经过认证的MMJ提供者进行了全州范围的调查。这项调查是由医用大麻临床结果研究小组开发的。调查的目的是告知医生协会的使命,即支持和传播研究。调查项目据此制定,并在一小群医生中进行了试点测试。我们确定了所有在佛罗里达州执业的有资格认证MMJ患者的医生(n=1609),调查他们关于MMJ的信息来源和培训需求。该调查通过邮件和电子邮件进行传播,并为完成调查提供40美元的奖励。51位(5%)提供者(平均年龄56岁,74%为男性)的初步答复总结如下。样本包括来自佛罗里达州22个县的提供者,代表了广泛的医学专业。大多数人(92%)既使用医用大麻,也使用传统医疗实践。为了了解MMJ, 98%的人使用研究文章,90%使用在线资源,86%从药房工作人员那里学习,84%从与其他提供者的讨论中学习,72%使用书籍,65%使用会议,61%使用杂志,35%有大麻的个人经历。被认为“非常有用”的资源最多的是会议(51%)、研究文章(50%)、与其他供应商的讨论(47%)和在线资源(47%)。被评为培训高优先级的主题包括药物- mmj相互作用(80%),帮助患者减少使用阿片类药物或其他药物的策略(80%),有关剂量选择和CBD的信息:四大麻酚比例(80%)、管理特定医疗状况或症状的证据(78%)、关于不同植物大麻素和萜烯的作用的信息(75%)、特定递送方式的优缺点(71%)、研究结果的一般更新(71%)、内源性大麻素系统的教育信息(67%)、医用大麻使用的安全性(55%)、大麻使用障碍的识别和管理(51%)、比较不同药房的产品(49%)。大多数提供者要么强烈同意,要么同意(77%),如果他们知道患者在药房接受哪些产品,他们就可以提供更好的护理。医生使用原始研究、在线资源和与同事交流的混合方法来学习MMJ。对更多药理学信息和治疗方案适应症细节的感知需求很高。大多数医生认为,有关MMJ的详细信息将改善病人的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信