ANALISIS KUALITAS LAYANAN AKADEMIK PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN TEKNIK MESIN UNS DENGAN METODE SERVQUAL DAN QFD (QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT)

Kostiyah Dewi Arini, Budi Harjanto, I. Widiastuti
{"title":"ANALISIS KUALITAS LAYANAN AKADEMIK PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN TEKNIK MESIN UNS DENGAN METODE SERVQUAL DAN QFD (QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT)","authors":"Kostiyah Dewi Arini, Budi Harjanto, I. Widiastuti","doi":"10.20961/nozel.v4i4.72273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to (1) analyze the gap between students' perceptions and expectations of the academic services of the Mechanical Engineering Education Study Program, (2) analyze the attributes of academic services that are priorities, and (3) identify improvement efforts that need to be prioritized in order to improve the quality of academic services at Mechanical Engineering Education Study Program. This research is quantitative descriptive. Sources of data in this study is primary data obtained directly from students through questionnaires, and interviews as supporting data. The sampling technique is done by probability sampling. Data collection was done by questionnaire and supported by interviews. The validity test technique used is the Pearson product moment correlation. Data analysis using ServQual and QFD methods. The results of this study are as follows. First, the gap between students' perceptions and expectations of academic services for the Mechanical Engineering Education Study Program obtained a negative servqual score with a total servQual score of -0.45. This means that the quality of services provided by the Study Program has not been able to meet student expectations. Second, service attributes that have the highest normalization and need to be prioritized to be improved according to the needs and expectations of students of the Mechanical Engineering Education Study Program are attributes X3, X11, X10, X32 and X33. Third, improvement efforts that need to be prioritized to improve service quality are based on a range of ratings from 1-10 on technical responses, namely, with the highest score of first rank of 0.05069 found in four technical responses on TR1, TR2, TR3, TR4, TR15, TR16, TR11, TR12, TR13, TR14, TR19, TR20, TR21. The Study Program continues to develop and improve the performance of the academic service quality attributes that are considered important by students and affect student satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":233393,"journal":{"name":"NOZEL Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Mesin","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NOZEL Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Mesin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20961/nozel.v4i4.72273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to (1) analyze the gap between students' perceptions and expectations of the academic services of the Mechanical Engineering Education Study Program, (2) analyze the attributes of academic services that are priorities, and (3) identify improvement efforts that need to be prioritized in order to improve the quality of academic services at Mechanical Engineering Education Study Program. This research is quantitative descriptive. Sources of data in this study is primary data obtained directly from students through questionnaires, and interviews as supporting data. The sampling technique is done by probability sampling. Data collection was done by questionnaire and supported by interviews. The validity test technique used is the Pearson product moment correlation. Data analysis using ServQual and QFD methods. The results of this study are as follows. First, the gap between students' perceptions and expectations of academic services for the Mechanical Engineering Education Study Program obtained a negative servqual score with a total servQual score of -0.45. This means that the quality of services provided by the Study Program has not been able to meet student expectations. Second, service attributes that have the highest normalization and need to be prioritized to be improved according to the needs and expectations of students of the Mechanical Engineering Education Study Program are attributes X3, X11, X10, X32 and X33. Third, improvement efforts that need to be prioritized to improve service quality are based on a range of ratings from 1-10 on technical responses, namely, with the highest score of first rank of 0.05069 found in four technical responses on TR1, TR2, TR3, TR4, TR15, TR16, TR11, TR12, TR13, TR14, TR19, TR20, TR21. The Study Program continues to develop and improve the performance of the academic service quality attributes that are considered important by students and affect student satisfaction.
用SERVQUAL和QFD方法学习UNS工程工程课程的学术质量分析(质量功能部署)
本研究旨在(1)分析学生对机械工程教育研究项目学术服务的认知与期望之间的差距,(2)分析优先学术服务的属性,以及(3)确定需要优先改进的工作,以提高机械工程教育研究项目的学术服务质量。这项研究是定量描述性的。本研究的数据来源是通过问卷调查直接从学生那里获得的主要数据,并以访谈作为支持数据。抽样技术是通过概率抽样完成的。数据收集采用问卷调查和访谈支持。使用的效度检验技术是皮尔逊积矩相关。使用ServQual和QFD方法进行数据分析。本研究的结果如下:首先,学生对机械工程教育研究项目学术服务的认知与期望之间的差距为负,总servqual得分为-0.45。这意味着学习计划提供的服务质量不能满足学生的期望。其次,根据机械工程教育研究项目学生的需求和期望,规范化程度最高、需要优先改进的服务属性为X3、X11、X10、X32、X33属性。第三,为提高服务质量而需要优先改进的工作是基于对技术响应的1-10评分范围,即在TR1、TR2、TR3、TR4、TR15、TR16、TR11、TR12、TR13、TR14、TR19、TR20、TR21四个技术响应中,第一等级得分最高的为0.05069。学习计划继续发展和提高学生认为重要的学术服务质量属性的表现,并影响学生的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信