About Influence of Choosing the Force Method Principal System on the Accuracy of Calculations in Solving a Stress-Based Plane Elasticity Problem

G. T. Gagalayan, A. Fominykh
{"title":"About Influence of Choosing the Force Method Principal System on the Accuracy of Calculations in Solving a Stress-Based Plane Elasticity Problem","authors":"G. T. Gagalayan, A. Fominykh","doi":"10.23947/2949-1835-2022-1-3-43-52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. It is known that the solution of a problem in elasticity theory is possible based on displacements, stresses, as well as mixed method. The most common is the displacement-based finite element method (FEM), however, it has its imperfections. The aim of this article is to study the features of numerical solution of a stress-based plane elasticity problem using the finite difference method (FDM) as a possible alternative to the FEM. The options for choosing the force method principal system are considered aiming to obtain the boundary conditions in calculating a rectangular beamwall by the grid method along with the influence thereof on the final result during stresses calculation.Materials and methods. The calculation of a rectangular beam-wall is made in Balka-Stenka software developed in DSTU. Comparison between a solution made by the finite difference method and a solution made by the displacementbased finite element method is made in the LIRA-SAPR software. The accuracy of calculations is determined by performing the static balance tests of the cut-off part of a structure. For the structure under consideration, the choice of five options of the force method principal system (FMРS) is analysed.Results. For the first time the conclusion was made that in contrast to the calculation of bar systems, the choice of FMРS does not significantly affect the final stress values in solving a plane elasticity problem.Discussion and conclusion. The comparison of calculation results made by the displacement-based finite element method and by the finite difference method showed some advantages of the latter. The finite difference method can act as an alternative to the displacement-based finite element method in solving a plane elasticity problem on condition of automation of the process of building the internal forces epures in a wall beam-wall contour.","PeriodicalId":446647,"journal":{"name":"Modern Trends in Construction, Urban and Territorial Planning","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Trends in Construction, Urban and Territorial Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23947/2949-1835-2022-1-3-43-52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. It is known that the solution of a problem in elasticity theory is possible based on displacements, stresses, as well as mixed method. The most common is the displacement-based finite element method (FEM), however, it has its imperfections. The aim of this article is to study the features of numerical solution of a stress-based plane elasticity problem using the finite difference method (FDM) as a possible alternative to the FEM. The options for choosing the force method principal system are considered aiming to obtain the boundary conditions in calculating a rectangular beamwall by the grid method along with the influence thereof on the final result during stresses calculation.Materials and methods. The calculation of a rectangular beam-wall is made in Balka-Stenka software developed in DSTU. Comparison between a solution made by the finite difference method and a solution made by the displacementbased finite element method is made in the LIRA-SAPR software. The accuracy of calculations is determined by performing the static balance tests of the cut-off part of a structure. For the structure under consideration, the choice of five options of the force method principal system (FMРS) is analysed.Results. For the first time the conclusion was made that in contrast to the calculation of bar systems, the choice of FMРS does not significantly affect the final stress values in solving a plane elasticity problem.Discussion and conclusion. The comparison of calculation results made by the displacement-based finite element method and by the finite difference method showed some advantages of the latter. The finite difference method can act as an alternative to the displacement-based finite element method in solving a plane elasticity problem on condition of automation of the process of building the internal forces epures in a wall beam-wall contour.
求解基于应力的平面弹性问题时选择力法主系统对计算精度的影响
介绍。众所周知,弹性理论中一个问题的求解可以基于位移法、应力法,也可以基于混合法。最常用的是基于位移的有限元法(FEM),但它也有其不足之处。本文的目的是利用有限差分法(FDM)作为有限元法的可能替代方法,研究基于应力的平面弹性问题数值解的特点。为了得到用网格法计算矩形梁墙时的边界条件及其在应力计算过程中对最终结果的影响,考虑了力法主系统的选择方案。材料和方法。在DSTU开发的Balka-Stenka软件中对矩形梁墙进行了计算。在LIRA-SAPR软件中比较了有限差分法和基于位移的有限元法的求解结果。计算的准确性是通过对结构的截止部分进行静平衡试验来确定的。针对所考虑的结构,分析了力法主体系(FMРS)的五种方案的选择。首次得出结论,在求解平面弹性问题时,与杆系计算相比,FMРS的选择对最终应力值没有显著影响。讨论与结论。将基于位移的有限元法与有限差分法的计算结果进行了比较,发现后者具有一定的优势。有限差分法可以替代基于位移的有限元法求解平面弹性问题,使墙体-梁-墙等高线的内力计算过程实现自动化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信