ENRZ vs. NRZ: A Performance Comparison at 112 Gbps

S. Chen, F. de Paulis
{"title":"ENRZ vs. NRZ: A Performance Comparison at 112 Gbps","authors":"S. Chen, F. de Paulis","doi":"10.1109/EDAPS56906.2022.9995425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The performances of Non-Return-to-Zero (NRZ) and Ensemble Non-Return-to-Zero (ENRZ) at the throughput of 112 Gbps per pair (224 Gbps for an ENRZ channel), with three channels of different levels of losses, are investigated. The Frequency Domain Matrix Multiplication (FDMM) channel simulation method is introduced and applied. The simulation results show that ENRZ has a remarkable advantage in terms of channel loss, which becomes more pronounced as channel loss increases. While it might still be challenging for ENRZ to support a full-length backplane at 224 Gbps per Chord™, its supportable range should be significantly larger than NRZ.","PeriodicalId":401014,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Electrical Design of Advanced Packaging and Systems (EDAPS)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Electrical Design of Advanced Packaging and Systems (EDAPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDAPS56906.2022.9995425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The performances of Non-Return-to-Zero (NRZ) and Ensemble Non-Return-to-Zero (ENRZ) at the throughput of 112 Gbps per pair (224 Gbps for an ENRZ channel), with three channels of different levels of losses, are investigated. The Frequency Domain Matrix Multiplication (FDMM) channel simulation method is introduced and applied. The simulation results show that ENRZ has a remarkable advantage in terms of channel loss, which becomes more pronounced as channel loss increases. While it might still be challenging for ENRZ to support a full-length backplane at 224 Gbps per Chord™, its supportable range should be significantly larger than NRZ.
ENRZ与NRZ: 112 Gbps下的性能比较
研究了非归零(Non-Return-to-Zero, NRZ)和集成非归零(Ensemble Non-Return-to-Zero, ENRZ)在每对传输速率为112 Gbps(一个ENRZ信道为224 Gbps)的情况下,在三个不同损耗水平的信道下的性能。介绍并应用频域矩阵乘法(FDMM)信道仿真方法。仿真结果表明,ENRZ在信道损耗方面具有显著的优势,并且随着信道损耗的增大,这种优势更加明显。虽然ENRZ支持每Chord™224 Gbps的全长背板可能仍然具有挑战性,但其支持范围应该比NRZ大得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信