A didactic for Vocational Education and Training ? : Critical exploration of the relation between general and subject didactics

Lázaro Moreno Herrera
{"title":"A didactic for Vocational Education and Training ? : Critical exploration of the relation between general and subject didactics","authors":"Lázaro Moreno Herrera","doi":"10.18999/BULITV.9.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Depending on perspectives and even languages the concept didactics is defined in different ways. The article acknowledges that the debate about conceptualization, particularly concerning the equivalence in English of what in Germanic and Latin languages is termed ‘didactics’, is well documented in the research literature (e.g. Wetsbury, Hoppmann & Riquarts, 2000). There is a claim in this article concerning the need to transcend the language discussion; it argues that there is indeed a need, particularly relevant for VET, to develop a close linkage between what some authors (e.g. Wenerstam & Hansen, 2006) consider “an empirically based” side of didactics associated to empirical findings and the “non-empirical” associated theoretical constructs for understanding the teaching-learning process. The article intends to critically revisit a number of influential didactical works both from German, Nordic and Anglo-Saxon contexts in search to contribute to the development of didactics for specific intricate subject of vocational education and training. The article does not intend to propose alternative solutions but suggest lines of development, encourage discussions and the further research that is required.","PeriodicalId":154366,"journal":{"name":"Vocational and Technical Education","volume":"605 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vocational and Technical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18999/BULITV.9.48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Depending on perspectives and even languages the concept didactics is defined in different ways. The article acknowledges that the debate about conceptualization, particularly concerning the equivalence in English of what in Germanic and Latin languages is termed ‘didactics’, is well documented in the research literature (e.g. Wetsbury, Hoppmann & Riquarts, 2000). There is a claim in this article concerning the need to transcend the language discussion; it argues that there is indeed a need, particularly relevant for VET, to develop a close linkage between what some authors (e.g. Wenerstam & Hansen, 2006) consider “an empirically based” side of didactics associated to empirical findings and the “non-empirical” associated theoretical constructs for understanding the teaching-learning process. The article intends to critically revisit a number of influential didactical works both from German, Nordic and Anglo-Saxon contexts in search to contribute to the development of didactics for specific intricate subject of vocational education and training. The article does not intend to propose alternative solutions but suggest lines of development, encourage discussions and the further research that is required.
职业教育与培训的教学?对一般教学法与学科教学法关系的批判性探索
根据不同的视角,甚至不同的语言,概念教学法以不同的方式定义。这篇文章承认,关于概念化的争论,特别是关于英语中日耳曼语和拉丁语中被称为“教学”的等价性的争论,在研究文献中有很好的记录(例如Wetsbury, Hoppmann & Riquarts, 2000)。在这篇文章中有一个关于需要超越语言讨论的主张;它认为,确实需要在一些作者(例如Wenerstam & Hansen, 2006)所认为的与经验发现相关的教学“基于经验的”方面与理解教学过程的“非经验的”相关理论结构之间建立密切的联系,特别是与职业教育相关的联系。本文旨在批判性地重新审视来自德国、北欧和盎格鲁-撒克逊背景下的一些有影响力的教学作品,以期为职业教育和培训中特定复杂主题的教学发展做出贡献。这篇文章并不打算提出替代的解决办法,而是建议发展路线,鼓励讨论和进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信