Policijas izziņas teorētiskais diskurss un tās īstenošanas problemātika Latvijā starpkaru periodā

Signe Skutele
{"title":"Policijas izziņas teorētiskais diskurss un tās īstenošanas problemātika Latvijā starpkaru periodā","authors":"Signe Skutele","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the interwar period of the Republic of Latvia, with the adoption of the amendments to the Criminal Procedure Law in 1939, legalisation of the inquiry was performed, equating it to the information acquired within preliminary investigation. However, before the implementation of the reform in the Republic of Latvia, information obtained within the framework of the inquiry was already legitimised and used as evidence in the preliminary investigation and court proceedings. Although the reasons for the reform were the improvement of the effectiveness and high qualification of the police, taking into account the theoretical discourse of the police inquiry, it can be established that the implemented reforms strengthened the inquisitorial criminal process without addressing the problems existing in practice. Within the scope of the current article, the author has analysed theoretical and practical aspects of the inquiry in the Republic of Latvia during the interwar period, identifying the scope of the inquiry specified in the Criminal Procedure Law and its enforcement procedures, as well as the reasons and objectives of the amendments to the Criminal Procedure Law of 1939 regarding the legalisation of inquiry.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the interwar period of the Republic of Latvia, with the adoption of the amendments to the Criminal Procedure Law in 1939, legalisation of the inquiry was performed, equating it to the information acquired within preliminary investigation. However, before the implementation of the reform in the Republic of Latvia, information obtained within the framework of the inquiry was already legitimised and used as evidence in the preliminary investigation and court proceedings. Although the reasons for the reform were the improvement of the effectiveness and high qualification of the police, taking into account the theoretical discourse of the police inquiry, it can be established that the implemented reforms strengthened the inquisitorial criminal process without addressing the problems existing in practice. Within the scope of the current article, the author has analysed theoretical and practical aspects of the inquiry in the Republic of Latvia during the interwar period, identifying the scope of the inquiry specified in the Criminal Procedure Law and its enforcement procedures, as well as the reasons and objectives of the amendments to the Criminal Procedure Law of 1939 regarding the legalisation of inquiry.
在两次世界大战之间的拉脱维亚共和国期间,随着1939年《刑事诉讼法》修正案的通过,进行了调查的合法化,将其等同于在初步调查中获得的资料。然而,在拉脱维亚共和国实施改革之前,在调查框架内获得的资料已经合法化,并在初步调查和法庭诉讼中用作证据。虽然改革的原因是为了提高警察的效能和素质,但结合警察讯问的理论论述,可以确定实施的改革加强了讯问刑事程序,但没有解决实践中存在的问题。在本文的范围内,作者分析了两次世界大战期间拉脱维亚共和国调查的理论和实践方面,确定了《刑事诉讼法》及其执行程序规定的调查范围,以及1939年《刑事诉讼法》关于调查合法化的修正案的原因和目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信