Pengaruh Penerapan Strategi Inquiring Minds Want To Know Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa

Af’idatun Nisaul Khoiroh, Imas Kania Rahman, Suhendra Suhendra
{"title":"Pengaruh Penerapan Strategi Inquiring Minds Want To Know Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa","authors":"Af’idatun Nisaul Khoiroh, Imas Kania Rahman, Suhendra Suhendra","doi":"10.15575/al-aulad.v1i2.3527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to determine whether there are differences in student learning outcomes that use learning with inquiring minds want to know strategy and students who use conventional learning lectures. The research method used is Quasi Experimental Design with non-equivalent kontrol group design.The research sample is class 3C as many as 25 students as an experimental class and 3D class as many as 25 students as a kontrol class. Data collection techniques using a test, which consist of pretest and posttest questions.  Data analysis using Independent Sample tTest with t count obtained in the Independent sample t-Test is 2,932. Whereas the t table for the 5% significance level is 2.02 and 1% is 2.69, it can be seen that t count is greater than t table that is 2.02 <2.932> 2.69, meaning that there are differences in learning outcomes between experimental and kontrol classes. So it can be said that the Inquiring Minds Want to know Strategy influences student learning outcomes on “Money type and use” material.","PeriodicalId":360242,"journal":{"name":"al-Aulad: Journal of Islamic Primary Education","volume":"189 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"al-Aulad: Journal of Islamic Primary Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15575/al-aulad.v1i2.3527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This research aims to determine whether there are differences in student learning outcomes that use learning with inquiring minds want to know strategy and students who use conventional learning lectures. The research method used is Quasi Experimental Design with non-equivalent kontrol group design.The research sample is class 3C as many as 25 students as an experimental class and 3D class as many as 25 students as a kontrol class. Data collection techniques using a test, which consist of pretest and posttest questions.  Data analysis using Independent Sample tTest with t count obtained in the Independent sample t-Test is 2,932. Whereas the t table for the 5% significance level is 2.02 and 1% is 2.69, it can be seen that t count is greater than t table that is 2.02 <2.932> 2.69, meaning that there are differences in learning outcomes between experimental and kontrol classes. So it can be said that the Inquiring Minds Want to know Strategy influences student learning outcomes on “Money type and use” material.
Minds想知道结果的战略实施的影响
本研究旨在确定采用探究式学习策略的学生与采用传统学习讲座的学生在学习效果上是否存在差异。研究方法采用准实验设计和非等效对照组设计。研究样本为3C班25人的实验班和3D班25人的对照班。使用测试的数据收集技术,包括测试前和测试后的问题。使用独立样本检验进行数据分析,独立样本t检验得到的t数为2932。而5%显著性水平下的t表为2.02,1%显著性水平下的t表为2.69,可见t计数大于t表2.02 2.69,说明实验组和对照组的学习结果存在差异。因此可以说,“好奇心理想知道策略”影响学生在“金钱类型和用途”材料上的学习效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信