A Review of Technology-Supported Classroom Observation in Teaching Evaluation

Qian Zhang, Jian Liao, Geping Liu, Yong Ke
{"title":"A Review of Technology-Supported Classroom Observation in Teaching Evaluation","authors":"Qian Zhang, Jian Liao, Geping Liu, Yong Ke","doi":"10.1109/EITT57407.2022.00029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A variety of classroom observation tools have been designed in recent decades. It is confusing for educational practitioners to choose the appropriate tool in specific teaching contexts. This paper reviews relevant studies on classroom observation nationally and internationally in the past two decades. By comparing the dimensions of classroom observation, this study summarizes the research trends and notices that it is important to be aware of the cultural differences of different classroom observation frameworks. The following issues were then identified: (1) the concept of classroom observation research method is vague and the dimensions of the evaluation system are not sufficient to reflect the real classroom situation; (2) the evaluation method lacks flexibility; (3) evaluators' bias influences the results of analysis; and (4)most studies over-focus on quantitative research and neglect qualitative evaluation. The findings of this study are expected to provide deeper insights on classroom teaching and to guide the design of smart teaching analysis tools in the future.","PeriodicalId":252290,"journal":{"name":"2022 Eleventh International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT)","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Eleventh International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EITT57407.2022.00029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A variety of classroom observation tools have been designed in recent decades. It is confusing for educational practitioners to choose the appropriate tool in specific teaching contexts. This paper reviews relevant studies on classroom observation nationally and internationally in the past two decades. By comparing the dimensions of classroom observation, this study summarizes the research trends and notices that it is important to be aware of the cultural differences of different classroom observation frameworks. The following issues were then identified: (1) the concept of classroom observation research method is vague and the dimensions of the evaluation system are not sufficient to reflect the real classroom situation; (2) the evaluation method lacks flexibility; (3) evaluators' bias influences the results of analysis; and (4)most studies over-focus on quantitative research and neglect qualitative evaluation. The findings of this study are expected to provide deeper insights on classroom teaching and to guide the design of smart teaching analysis tools in the future.
技术支持课堂观察在教学评价中的应用综述
近几十年来,各种各样的课堂观察工具被设计出来。在特定的教学环境中选择合适的工具是教育从业者的困惑。本文回顾了近二十年来国内外关于课堂观察的相关研究。通过对课堂观察维度的比较,本研究总结了研究趋势,并指出了解不同课堂观察框架的文化差异非常重要。发现了以下问题:(1)课堂观察研究法的概念模糊,评价体系的维度不足以反映真实课堂情况;(2)评价方法缺乏灵活性;(3)评价者的偏倚影响分析结果;(4)多数研究过于注重定量研究,忽视了定性评价。本研究的结果有望为课堂教学提供更深入的见解,并指导未来智能教学分析工具的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信