THE AESTHETIC TRANSFORMATION OF THE BALTIC AND CHRISTIAN SYMBOLS IN PETRAS DIRGELA’S “THE KINGDOM”

Vytautas Martinkus
{"title":"THE AESTHETIC TRANSFORMATION OF THE BALTIC AND CHRISTIAN SYMBOLS IN PETRAS DIRGELA’S “THE KINGDOM”","authors":"Vytautas Martinkus","doi":"10.13165/sms-18-10-2-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with the epic “The Kingdom” by Petras Dirgėla, a historical work of literature in 14 parts (books) as a subject of multivariable  senses of faith (esteem). The significance of these symbols as religious aesthetic (literary) values   is analysed. The aim of the article is to discuss the relationship between religious symbols from different epochs (pre-Christian and Christian) and their transformation into aesthetic values   in the historical novel. The research seeks to examine the change in symbolic values   of religion in the historical Lithuanian novel as a subject of different cultural symbols. The research seeks  to address the questions: 1) Can symbols of a Baltic religion changed to Christian ones essentially affect the form of epic work? 2) Which symbols of the Baltic religion in the epic “The Kingdom” are most important to the narrator in establishing the kingdom’s literary world? 3) How does the novel transform the religious symbols into aesthetic (literary) values? Answering the questions raised is an important aesthetic issue  of Lithuanian philosopher Juozas Mureika (the theory of aesthesis). The article proposes the following  conclusions. The Baltic and Christian symbols in the novel “The Kingdom” are equally important to its literary form. The structure of the work (form) and the traits of narrative poetics are determined by the fundamental value of any faith – the connection between the road of earthly human life and the kingdom of heaven (the spiritual). The historical interrelationships between the symbols of different religions increase the multiplicity of poetic means (such as symbols, metonymy and metaphors) and their aesthetic effect in literary works. One of the most important symbols that actively determines the structure of an epoch`s  boundaries  is water and a path. Their variables are sea and lake, road and passenger. The last  most significant element in the novel is the symbol of the tree (or forest). From an aesthetic perspective, it is not only the significance of these (and all other) symbolic signs that is important, but also their “architectonics”, through which the reader experiences the whole set of symbols of a work and establishes new archetypal meanings.","PeriodicalId":256611,"journal":{"name":"Societal Studies","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Societal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13165/sms-18-10-2-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article deals with the epic “The Kingdom” by Petras Dirgėla, a historical work of literature in 14 parts (books) as a subject of multivariable  senses of faith (esteem). The significance of these symbols as religious aesthetic (literary) values   is analysed. The aim of the article is to discuss the relationship between religious symbols from different epochs (pre-Christian and Christian) and their transformation into aesthetic values   in the historical novel. The research seeks to examine the change in symbolic values   of religion in the historical Lithuanian novel as a subject of different cultural symbols. The research seeks  to address the questions: 1) Can symbols of a Baltic religion changed to Christian ones essentially affect the form of epic work? 2) Which symbols of the Baltic religion in the epic “The Kingdom” are most important to the narrator in establishing the kingdom’s literary world? 3) How does the novel transform the religious symbols into aesthetic (literary) values? Answering the questions raised is an important aesthetic issue  of Lithuanian philosopher Juozas Mureika (the theory of aesthesis). The article proposes the following  conclusions. The Baltic and Christian symbols in the novel “The Kingdom” are equally important to its literary form. The structure of the work (form) and the traits of narrative poetics are determined by the fundamental value of any faith – the connection between the road of earthly human life and the kingdom of heaven (the spiritual). The historical interrelationships between the symbols of different religions increase the multiplicity of poetic means (such as symbols, metonymy and metaphors) and their aesthetic effect in literary works. One of the most important symbols that actively determines the structure of an epoch`s  boundaries  is water and a path. Their variables are sea and lake, road and passenger. The last  most significant element in the novel is the symbol of the tree (or forest). From an aesthetic perspective, it is not only the significance of these (and all other) symbolic signs that is important, but also their “architectonics”, through which the reader experiences the whole set of symbols of a work and establishes new archetypal meanings.
彼得拉斯·迪格拉《王国》中波罗的海与基督教符号的美学转换
这篇文章讨论史诗“王国”由彼特拉斯Dirgėla,一个历史的文学作品分为14部分(书)作为一个主题的多元信仰(尊重)的感觉。分析了这些符号作为宗教审美(文学)价值的意义。本文旨在探讨不同时期(前基督教时期和基督教时期)的宗教符号在历史小说中的关系及其向审美价值的转化。本研究试图考察作为不同文化符号主体的立陶宛历史小说中宗教象征价值的变化。该研究试图解决以下问题:1)波罗的海宗教符号转变为基督教符号是否会从本质上影响史诗作品的形式?2)史诗《王国》中波罗的海宗教的哪些符号对叙述者建立王国的文学世界最为重要?3)小说如何将宗教符号转化为审美(文学)价值?回答这些问题是立陶宛哲学家穆雷卡(Juozas Mureika)的一个重要美学问题。本文提出以下结论。小说《王国》中的波罗的海和基督教象征对其文学形式同样重要。作品的结构(形式)和叙事诗学的特征是由任何信仰的基本价值——人类尘世生活之路与天国(精神)之间的联系所决定的。不同宗教符号之间的历史相互关系,增加了文学作品中象征、转喻、隐喻等诗歌手段的多样性及其审美效果。决定一个时代边界结构的最重要的符号之一是水和路径。他们的变量是海和湖,路和乘客。小说中最后一个最重要的元素是树(或森林)的象征。从美学的角度来看,重要的不仅是这些(以及所有其他)象征性符号的意义,还有它们的“建筑学”,读者通过它体验到作品的整套符号,并建立新的原型意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信