{"title":"Critiques in the Margins: Contextualizing Mughulṭāy b. Qilīj’s (d. 762/1361) Gloss on the Sīra","authors":"Güllü Yıldız","doi":"10.5840/islamicphil2023148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines Mughulṭāy b. Qilīj’s (d. 762/1361) al-Zahr al-bāsim fī siyar Abī al-Qāsim, a ḥāshiya (gloss, marginal notes) on ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Suhaylī’s (d. 581/1185) commentary on Ibn Isḥāq’s Sīra. Drawing on evidence from Mamlūk-era chronicles, biographical dictionaries, and commentarial introductions, it analyzes Mughulṭāy b. Qilīj as a historical figure and the context and content of his work. This is done in order to demonstrate how commentaries and glosses are deeply related to the scholarly and cultural life of the period. These resources testify to the antagonistic relationship between Mughulṭāy and his opponents and to the ensuing rivalry between them. Hence, this article seeks to examine the correlation between his personality and the rationale for his commentary, to determine the reasons behind his choice of text to write a gloss on and his sustained and harsh criticism against al-Suhaylī and his scholarly legacy.","PeriodicalId":301506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Islamic Philosophy","volume":"399 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Islamic Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/islamicphil2023148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article examines Mughulṭāy b. Qilīj’s (d. 762/1361) al-Zahr al-bāsim fī siyar Abī al-Qāsim, a ḥāshiya (gloss, marginal notes) on ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Suhaylī’s (d. 581/1185) commentary on Ibn Isḥāq’s Sīra. Drawing on evidence from Mamlūk-era chronicles, biographical dictionaries, and commentarial introductions, it analyzes Mughulṭāy b. Qilīj as a historical figure and the context and content of his work. This is done in order to demonstrate how commentaries and glosses are deeply related to the scholarly and cultural life of the period. These resources testify to the antagonistic relationship between Mughulṭāy and his opponents and to the ensuing rivalry between them. Hence, this article seeks to examine the correlation between his personality and the rationale for his commentary, to determine the reasons behind his choice of text to write a gloss on and his sustained and harsh criticism against al-Suhaylī and his scholarly legacy.
本文考察了Mughulṭāy b. qil j (d. 762/1361) al-Zahr al-bāsim f ' siyar ab' al-Qāsim,这是对al . Abd al-Raḥmān al- suhayli ' s (d. 581/1185)对伊本Isḥāq s . ra的评论ḥāshiya(注释,旁注)。根据Mamlūk-era编年史、传记词典和评论介绍的证据,它分析了Mughulṭāy b.齐尔基作为一个历史人物及其作品的背景和内容。这样做是为了证明注释和注释是如何与这个时期的学术和文化生活密切相关的。这些资源证明了Mughulṭāy和他的对手之间的敌对关系,以及他们之间随后的竞争。因此,本文试图考察他的个性与其评论的基本原理之间的关系,以确定他选择注释的文本背后的原因,以及他对al- suhayli的持续和严厉批评及其学术遗产的原因。