Problems of state regulation of social security during a pandemic

T. Shipunova
{"title":"Problems of state regulation of social security during a pandemic","authors":"T. Shipunova","doi":"10.21638/spbu12.2021.405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides a characteristic of approaches to understanding social security, and also analyzes one central problem: the possibility of identifying and assessing risk. In modern society, perceptions of risk are determined by a political vision of the situation. In this regard, attention is increasing turned to strategies of state regulation and the definition of measures of state responsibility in ensuring security, especially during a pandemic. At the moment, a number of questions have arisen that require study, since the answers to them largely determine the degree of pain in the passage of the pandemic by different societies. The article examines the validity of introducing a wide range of prohibitive measures, which with a high degree of probability can lead to a deterioration in the social security of the population and an expansion of the crisis of power in all democratic societies. The author focuses on the growing processes of normalization and discipline, which significantly complicate social interactions in various spheres of life and devalue democratic values. The analysis leads to the conclusion that government strategies to combat the pandemic should be associated with the partnership of all security agents, including individuals. This, in turn, will be able to restore the confidence of the population in the authorities, as well as lay the foundations for the development of a safety culture that will activate society in protection against existing and possible future threats to public health.","PeriodicalId":135763,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2021.405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article provides a characteristic of approaches to understanding social security, and also analyzes one central problem: the possibility of identifying and assessing risk. In modern society, perceptions of risk are determined by a political vision of the situation. In this regard, attention is increasing turned to strategies of state regulation and the definition of measures of state responsibility in ensuring security, especially during a pandemic. At the moment, a number of questions have arisen that require study, since the answers to them largely determine the degree of pain in the passage of the pandemic by different societies. The article examines the validity of introducing a wide range of prohibitive measures, which with a high degree of probability can lead to a deterioration in the social security of the population and an expansion of the crisis of power in all democratic societies. The author focuses on the growing processes of normalization and discipline, which significantly complicate social interactions in various spheres of life and devalue democratic values. The analysis leads to the conclusion that government strategies to combat the pandemic should be associated with the partnership of all security agents, including individuals. This, in turn, will be able to restore the confidence of the population in the authorities, as well as lay the foundations for the development of a safety culture that will activate society in protection against existing and possible future threats to public health.
大流行期间国家对社会保障的监管问题
本文提供了理解社会保障方法的一个特点,并分析了一个核心问题:识别和评估风险的可能性。在现代社会,对风险的看法是由对形势的政治看法决定的。在这方面,越来越多的注意力转向国家监管战略和确定国家在确保安全方面的责任措施,特别是在大流行期间。目前,出现了一些需要研究的问题,因为这些问题的答案在很大程度上决定了不同社会在大流行期间的痛苦程度。这篇文章审查了采用广泛的禁忌性措施的有效性,这些措施极有可能导致人口的社会保障恶化,并扩大所有民主社会的权力危机。作者将重点放在日益增长的正常化和纪律进程上,这使生活各个领域的社会互动严重复杂化,并使民主价值贬值。分析得出的结论是,政府防治大流行病的战略应与包括个人在内的所有安全人员的伙伴关系联系起来。反过来,这将能够恢复人民对当局的信心,并为发展一种安全文化奠定基础,这种文化将激活社会,保护公众健康免受现有和未来可能的威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信